Procedural Sedation for Pediatric Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy

March 18, 2022 updated by: Feyza Sever, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Procedural Sedation for Pediatric Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Undergoing Intrathecal Treatment

Background and Aim: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive symmetrical weakness and atrophy of proximal muscles causing from degeneration of anterior horn cells of spinal cord. Nusinersen must be administered intrathecally and this treatment is specially for spinal muscular atrophy. Procedural sedation is commonly enough for intrathecal treatment in children. In this retrospective study, the investigators aimed to present our experience in procedural sedation for the intrathecal treatment of patients with SMA 1,2 and 3 in our hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Design: This research is a retrospective obsevational study. Methods: After approval Institutional Review Board, data from anesthesia charts and electronic medical records of 14 patients with SMA type I, II and III who underwent procedural sedation,such as; the demographics data of the patients (age, gender, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical Status), which anesthetic agent was used and their doeses, during of anesthesia, presence of scoliosis, by whom the procedure was performed etc. was reviewed. All our patients with SMA type II and III who underwent intrathecal treatment are given sedation with different combination of anesthetic agent. Due to peripheral intravenous line was placed previously, intravenous induction was performed in all of our patients For procedural sedation, anesthesiologists used different combination of midazolam, ketamine, propofol, fentanyl or remifentanyl, depending on the patient's requirement. They were oxygenated with a face mask or nasal cannula while their spontaneous breathing continues. All patients were recovered in the recovery room.

Statistical analysis: The data were analyzed by using SPSS Statistics Software (SPSS 24, Chicago, IL, USA) Descriptive statistics were used in this study. Mean and standart deviation were calculated for Age (year), Weight (kilogram), Midazolam Dose (mg/kg), Fentanyl Dose (mcg/kg), Remifentanyl Dose (mcg/kg), Propofol Dose (mg/kg), Ketamine Dose (mg/kg) and Length of Stay in Recovery Room (minute) and frequency analysis were made for the number of intervention.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Çankaya
      • Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey, 06800
        • Feyza Sever

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric patients younger than 18 years old with SMA 1,2 and 3 who were to undergo intrathecal treatment under procedural sedation in our clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients younger than 18 years old with SMA 1,2 and 3 who were to undergo intrathecal Nusinersen treatment were included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance in the radiology unit were excluded from the study because their procedures were performed in another hospital.
  • Patients without a diagnosis of SMA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural sedation
Time Frame: 4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
The number of pediatric patients with SMA I,II and III who underwent intrathecal treatment required procedural sedation
4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Anesthetics use
Time Frame: 4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
The anesthetic agents and their doses that used during procedure
4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Age
Time Frame: 4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Age in year
4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Gender
Time Frame: 4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Gender as female/male
4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Weight
Time Frame: 4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Weight in kilograms
4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status
Time Frame: 4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
ASA score
4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Type of SMA
Time Frame: 4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
SMA I, SMA II and SMA III
4 years (The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of scoliosis
Time Frame: 4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)(
Yes or no
4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)(
How many times intrathecal treatment was performed for each patient
Time Frame: 4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
The number of intrathecal treatments was administered for each patient over 4 years was recorded.
4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
By whom the procedure was performed
Time Frame: 4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
It was recorded who performed the lumbar puncture procedure from a neurologist, neurosurgeon, or anesthesiologist.
4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Length of time spent in recovery room
Time Frame: 4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)
Recovery time in minutes
4 years The data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed between July 2017 and December 2021.)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe