- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05292612
CvC-SAD (Clinician vs Coach)Self-help Versions in a RCT
Chinese Internet-delivered Cognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder in Hong Kong: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial to Compare Clinician Versus Coach Guidance
Background:
Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is a common mental problem, where people experience severe and disabling anxiety about social situations and interactions. It is highly prevalent world-wide and in Hong Kong, causing significant suffering/distress. While evidence-based interventions exist, e.g., cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), there will be not enough trained therapists to meet the treatment demand so that the majority of the SAD patients receive no treatment. Internet-based therapies may offer a solution, given that they deliver treatment more cost-efficiently by requiring lesser therapist time so that more patients can be treated with the same therapist resources. One UK internet-based CBT protocol for SAD, iCBT(C&W), shows high efficacy and efficiency in initial UK and Hong Kong trials with Englishspeaking patients.
Objectives:
- To develop and confirm the efficacy of a Chinese-language version of iCBT(C&W), administered by clinical psychologists in standard therapist-guided format.
- To develop an even more cost-efficient new self-help format with some minimal 'coaching' performed by trained psychology bachelor-level graduates - its efficacy expected as 'noninferior' to that of the therapist-guided format.
Overall design:
Three-arm parallel group randomised controlled noninferiority trial: Standard therapist-guided iCT-SAD vs. Guided self-help iCT-SAD vs. Waitlist
Method:
The iCBT(C&W) protocol will be translated into Chinese. Approximately 110 Chinese adults with SAD will be recruited in Hong Kong and randomised into one of two treatment conditions, therapist-guided versus self-help. The treatment lasts 14 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (self-report version).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Patrick Leung, Prof.
- Phone Number: +85239436502
- Email: pleung@cuhk.edu.hk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Candace Ng
- Phone Number: +85298046936
- Email: candace.ng@ha.org.hk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Shatin, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong
-
Contact:
- PATRICK LEUNG
- Phone Number: 3943 6502
- Email: pleung@cuhk.edu.hk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion
- Meets DSM-5 criteria for SAD (SAD must be generalised, not the 'performance only' subtype)
- Considers SAD their main problem
- Age 18 or over (no upper age limit)
- No current psychotropic mediation, or on a stable dose for at least two months without improvement, and willing to remain at this dose throughout trial
- Participant agrees not to start any other forms of treatment during the trial
- Chinese resident of Hong Kong
- Proficient in written traditional Chinese and spoken Cantonese
- Internet access from home
Exclusion
- current or past psychosis, bipolar disorder, or borderline personality disorder
- active suicidality
- 'Moderate' or 'Severe' Alcohol Use Disorder or Substance Use Disorder (based on DSM-5)
- No current or previous CBT for SAD (defined as at least 5 sessions, and including an exposure component), including internet-CBT studies
- Not another current emotional problem that is the participant's main concern (Participant must not be largely absorbed in another emotional problem, for which it would be unethical not to address as a priority)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Standard therapist-guided iCT-SAD vs. Waitlist
to examine if standard iCT-SAD delivered in Chinese is superior to waitlist. participants in the experimental group would receive iCBT(C&W) for SAD under the guidance of trained therapist. |
iCBT(C&W) for SAD implements all the key procedures of the face-to-face treatment.
Patients are guided through the treatment by using secure messaging and regular telephone or webcam calls.
The treatment comprises a series of online modules, each of which includes educational texts, patient testimonies, video illustrations, case examples, questionand- answer boxes, monitoring sheets, behavioural experiments and other homework assignments.
|
|
Experimental: Guided self-help iCT-SAD vs. Waitlist
to examine if guided self-help iCT-SAD delivered in Chinese is superior to waitlist. participants in the experimental group would receive iCBT(C&W) for SAD under the guidance of trained coaches. |
iCBT(C&W) for SAD implements all the key procedures of the face-to-face treatment.
Patients are guided through the treatment by using secure messaging and regular telephone or webcam calls.
The treatment comprises a series of online modules, each of which includes educational texts, patient testimonies, video illustrations, case examples, questionand- answer boxes, monitoring sheets, behavioural experiments and other homework assignments.
|
|
Experimental: Standard therapist-guided iCT-SAD vs. Guided self-help iCT-SAD
to examine if guided self-help iCT-SAD is noninferior to standard iCT-SAD. participants would be randomised into two groups. one group of participants would receive iCBT(C&W) for SAD under the guidance of trained therapist while the other group of participants would receive iCBT(C&W) for SAD under the guidance of trained coaches. |
iCBT(C&W) for SAD implements all the key procedures of the face-to-face treatment.
Patients are guided through the treatment by using secure messaging and regular telephone or webcam calls.
The treatment comprises a series of online modules, each of which includes educational texts, patient testimonies, video illustrations, case examples, questionand- answer boxes, monitoring sheets, behavioural experiments and other homework assignments.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, Self-report version (LSAS)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
LSAS consists of twenty-four items to assess individual's fear and avoidance towards different social interactions and performance situations.
A total of six subscale scores could be obtained in LSAS, including the total fear, fear of social interactions, fear of performance situations, total avoidance, avoidance of social interactions, and avoidance of performance situations.
|
through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
|
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, Self-report version (LSAS)
Time Frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
LSAS consists of twenty-four items to assess individual's fear and avoidance towards different social interactions and performance situations.
A total of six subscale scores could be obtained in LSAS, including the total fear, fear of social interactions, fear of performance situations, total avoidance, avoidance of social interactions, and avoidance of performance situations.
|
at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, Self-report version (LSAS)
Time Frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
LSAS consists of twenty-four items to assess individual's fear and avoidance towards different social interactions and performance situations.
A total of six subscale scores could be obtained in LSAS, including the total fear, fear of social interactions, fear of performance situations, total avoidance, avoidance of social interactions, and avoidance of performance situations.
|
at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression Scale (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
PHQ-9 consists of nine items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 major depressive disorder
|
through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression Scale (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
PHQ-9 consists of nine items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 major depressive disorder
|
at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
GAD-7 consists of seven items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 common anxiety disorders
|
through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
GAD-7 consists of seven items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 common anxiety disorders
|
at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
WSAS consists of five items that measure participants' perceived functional impairment incurred by their presenting psychiatric problem (which, in this study, refers to SAD)
|
through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
|
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
Time Frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
WSAS consists of five items that measure participants' perceived functional impairment incurred by their presenting psychiatric problem (which, in this study, refers to SAD)
|
at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Social Phobia Weekly Summary Scale (SPWSS)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
SPWSS is a five-item self-report questionnaire on social anxiety, social avoidance, self-focused versus external-focused attention, anticipatory processing, and post-event rumination.
|
through study completion, an average of 14 weeks
|
|
Social Phobia Weekly Summary Scale (SPWSS)
Time Frame: at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
SPWSS is a five-item self-report questionnaire on social anxiety, social avoidance, self-focused versus external-focused attention, anticipatory processing, and post-event rumination.
|
at 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression Scale (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
PHQ-9 consists of nine items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 major depressive disorder
|
at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
GAD-7 consists of seven items that captures the criterion symptoms of DSM-5 common anxiety disorders
|
at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
Time Frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
WSAS consists of five items that measure participants' perceived functional impairment incurred by their presenting psychiatric problem (which, in this study, refers to SAD)
|
at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Social Phobia Weekly Summary Scale (SPWSS)
Time Frame: at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
SPWSS is a five-item self-report questionnaire on social anxiety, social avoidance, self-focused versus external-focused attention, anticipatory processing, and post-event rumination.
|
at 9-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Behavioural social performance
Time Frame: at baseline
|
A behavioural assessment scheme, which includes the Simulated Social Interaction Test, unstructured conversation tasks and an impromptu speech, is adopted to measure social performance.
Self-ratings of the behavioural scheme in skill and anxiety domains will be obtained by participants (self ratings) and observers (observer ratings).
Ratings will be given in a 5-point Likert Scale.
In the anxiety domain, 1 refers to the least anxiety while 5 refers to the most anxiety.
In the skill domain, 1 refers to the worst skill and 5 refers to the best skill.
Mean scores of the ratings will be calculated and used for analysis.
|
at baseline
|
|
Behavioural social performance
Time Frame: 1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
|
A behavioural assessment scheme, which includes the Simulated Social Interaction Test, unstructured conversation tasks and an impromptu speech, is adopted to measure social performance.
Self-ratings of the behavioural scheme in skill and anxiety domains will be obtained by participants (self ratings) and observers (observer ratings).
Ratings will be given in a 5-point Likert Scale.
In the anxiety domain, 1 refers to the least anxiety while 5 refers to the most anxiety.
In the skill domain, 1 refers to the worst skill and 5 refers to the best skill.
Mean scores of the ratings will be calculated and used for analysis.
|
1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
|
|
Social Participation (SP)
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships.
It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
At baseline
|
|
Social Participation (SP)
Time Frame: week 8 of treatment
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships.
It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
week 8 of treatment
|
|
Social Participation (SP)
Time Frame: 1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships.
It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
|
|
Social Participation (SP)
Time Frame: 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's frequency of social participation from different social relationships.
It is measured in a 7-point Likert Scale on the frequency of participation in 13 different social contexts where "1" refers to "never participated" and "7" refers to "always participated".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
|
Social Satisfaction (SS)
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
At baseline
|
|
Social Satisfaction (SS)
Time Frame: week 8 of treatment
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
week 8 of treatment
|
|
Social Satisfaction (SS)
Time Frame: 1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
1 week after completing the 14-week treatment
|
|
Social Satisfaction (SS)
Time Frame: 3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
Social Participation (SP) is a self-report questionnaire for evaluation of one's subjective satisfaction from 5 different social relationships where "1" refers to "the least satisfaction" and "7" refers to "the most satisfaction".
The higher the score, the better the social functioning outcome.
|
3-month post-treatment follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Patrick Leung, Prof., Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022.086-T
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Social Anxiety Disorder
-
Aya Technologies LimitedCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)United Kingdom
-
Tel Aviv UniversityCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)Israel
-
University of BernUniversity of LuebeckCompletedSocial Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)Switzerland
-
Aya Technologies LimitedCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)United Kingdom
-
Hong Kong Shue Yan UniversityNot yet recruitingSocial Phobia | Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD)
-
Daniel LiebermanTerminatedAnxiety | Anxiety Disorder SocialUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityBrain & Behavior Research FoundationTerminatedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder of ChildhoodUnited States
-
Tufts UniversityCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder of ChildhoodUnited States
-
Ono Pharmaceutical Co. LtdActive, not recruiting
-
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.BehaVR LLCCompletedSocial Anxiety Disorder (SAD)United States
Clinical Trials on iCBT(C&W) for SAD
-
Theravance BiopharmaCompleted
-
ZYUS Life Sciences Inc.Novotech (Australia) Pty Limited; ZYUS Life Sciences Australia Pty LtdCompletedHealthy | OsteoarthritisAustralia
-
EnnovaBio Australia Pharmaceuticals Pty LtdCompleted
-
Region of Southern DenmarkRecruitingDepression - Major Depressive DisorderDenmark
-
University of AarhusDanish Breast Cancer Cooperative GroupUnknown
-
Göteborg UniversityVastra Gotaland RegionRecruiting
-
Nicholas M MohrWashington University School of Medicine; Hennepin County Medical Center, MinneapolisWithdrawn
-
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyCompletedMeningitis | Meningococcal InfectionsUnited States
-
Spero TherapeuticsSimbec ResearchCompletedHealthy VolunteersUnited Kingdom
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedDepressionUnited States