Strategies for Kidney Outcomes Prevention and Evaluation - The SKOPE Study (SKOPE)

May 13, 2026 updated by: Professor Tazeen Jafar, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health threat associated with significant morbidity, high mortality, and reduced quality of life. However, empirical evidence is limited on strategies to enhance the effectiveness of care for CKD. The objective of the trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multicomponent primary care strategies in preserving kidney function among patients with CKD at primary care clinics in Singapore.

Methods: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial, in 4 socioeconomically diverse primary care clinics (polyclinics) in Singapore over 3 years. A total of 896 participants with CKD Stage 3 or worse aged ≥40 and <80 years will be enrolled, with 224 from each polyclinic. Participants enrolled in each polyclinic will be randomly allocated to the intervention or usual care group in a 1:1 ratio.

Intervention includes four components 1) training nurses as health coaches for motivational conversation and CKD specific lifestyle counseling on diet and exercise, using hybrid follow-up approach of in-person, telephone, and secure WhatsApp video meetings; 2)Training physicians in algorithm-based standardized management of CKD and hybrid care delivery;3) subsidy on sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for CKD; and 4) regular CKD case review meetings.

Patients in the usual care arm will be treated by physicians and nurses who and are not trained in SKOPE treatment algorithms.

Study outcomes:

The primary outcome will be the eGFR total slope from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months. secondary effectiveness outcomes will be 1) Change in CVD risk score as measured by The Million Hearts Longitudinal ASCVD Risk Assessment score 2) Change in CKD quality of life measured by KDQOL-36TM

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

724

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • SingHealth Polyclinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

4.3 Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with CKD Stage 3 or Stage 4 defined as persistent reduction in Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula eGFR ≥15 and < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 for at least 3 months based on two eGFR readings at least 3 months apart and the last eGFR should be measured at least 3 months ago.
  • Receiving care at the polyclinics in Singapore for at least one year at the time of recruitment
  • Age >=40 and <80 years
  • Singaporean or permanent resident

4.4 Exclusion Criteria

  • On kidney replacement therapy
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Known terminal illness
  • Recent hospitalization during last 3 months
  • History of leg or foot ulcers, severe mental illness, prior kidney transplant
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: multicomponent intervention
1) 1. Training Nurses/service coordinators as Health Coaches and Hybrid Follow-up Approach of in-person, Telephone and Secure Video Sessions; 2)Training physicians in algorithm-based standardized management of CKD and hybrid care delivery;3) subsidy on sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for CKD; and 4) regular CKD case review meetings.
Intervention includes four components 1) training nurses as health coaches for motivational conversation and CKD specific lifestyle counseling on diet and exercise, using hybrid follow-up approach of in-person, telephone, and secure video sessions; 2)Training physicians in algorithm-based standardized management of CKD and hybrid care delivery;3) subsidy on sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for CKD; and 4) regular CKD case review meetings.
No Intervention: Usual care
treated by physicians and nurses who are not trained in SKOPE treatment algorithms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the eGFR
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in CVD risk score
Time Frame: at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline
measured by The Million Hearts Longitudinal atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease(ASCVD) Risk Assessment score:not assessed via a scale. Results are given as a percent (%) on a scale of less than 1% to 99.99%. A higher score indicates a higher risk
at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline
Mean change in CKD quality of life
Time Frame: at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline
Assessed by The 5-level EuroQol-5D version (EQ-5D-5L):Health state index scores generally range from less than 0 (where 0 is the value of a health state equivalent to dead; negative values representing values as worse than dead) to 1 (the value of full health), with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analogue scale (VAS) on which the patient rates his/her perceived health from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).
at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline
guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) goals
Time Frame: at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline
  1. Attained more than 2 guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) goals
  2. Attained more than 3 GDMT goals
  3. Attained more than 4 GDMT goals
at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline
Individual guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) goals
Time Frame: at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline

Proportion of participants in each arm who experienced each of the following categories of events on or before month 12, 24, and 36 follow up:

  1. SBP/DBP<140/90 mmHg
  2. SBP/DBP<130/80 mmHg
  3. A1C<7.0%
  4. Taking statin medications
  5. Taking RASS blockers medications
  6. Taking SGLT2i medications
  7. Not smoking
at 12, 24, and 36 months from the baseline
MoCA score
Time Frame: at 36 months from the baseline
continuous outcome
at 36 months from the baseline
Mild cognitive impairment
Time Frame: at 36 months from the baseline
Proportion of mild cognitive impairment determined by local norms of MoCA (cutpoint:24/25)
at 36 months from the baseline
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: at 36 months from the baseline
Measured by dynamometer
at 36 months from the baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incident eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Incident eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m2;
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Incident eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73m2;
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Incident ACR >300 mg/g;
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Rate of MACE (composite of total death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, and hospitalization because of heart failure
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change in kidney failure risk equation ( KFRE) score
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
The score is based on an equation not on a scale,Results are given as a percent (%) on a scale of less than 1% to 99.99%. A higher score indicates a higher risk
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Proportion of subjects who experienced albuminuria defined as ACR >30 mg/g
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
defined as ACR >30 mg/g
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Rate of All-cause mortality
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Rate of CVD deaths
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Rate of hospital admission due to CHD, heart failure, or stroke
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change in Dietary score
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Not based on a scale, higher score indicates better outcome
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change in level of physical activity
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (PHAQ): there is no range, higher scores denote higher levels of physical activities
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change in BMI
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change in adherence to antihypertensive
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change in adherence to glucose-lowering medication
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change from baseline in therapeutic intensity score of antihypertensive medication (all and class specific) therapeutic intensity score (summary measure that accounts for the number of medications and the relative doses a patient received)
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
summary measure that accounts for the number of medications and the relative doses a patient received. Higher scores indicate higher dose.
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
b) Proportion of subjects with at least 40% decline in baseline eGFR or KRT without mortality
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Incident dialysis or MACE
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Mean change from baseline in CVD risk based on Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs (PRVENT) equation
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
based on an equation, Results are given as a percent (%) on a scale of less than 1% to 99.99%. A higher score indicates a higher risk
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
at least 40% decline from baseline eGFR or underwent KRT or experienced mortality
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
at least 50% decline from baseline eGFR or underwent KRT or experienced mortality
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
at least 50% decline from baseline eGFR or underwent KRT
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
underwent KRT with mortality
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
underwent KRT with or without mortality
Time Frame: from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
from randomization to final follow-up at 36 months
Proportion of subjects who experienced LDL-C <100 mg/dL
Time Frame: month 12, 24, and 36 follow ups.
month 12, 24, and 36 follow ups.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Diseases

Clinical Trials on Multicomponent intervention

Subscribe