Online Psychosocial Intervention for Nursing Students Who Experienced Intimate Partner Abuse in Turkey

May 6, 2022 updated by: Hacer DEMIRKOL, Bozok University

Online Psychosocial Intervention for Nursing Students Who Experienced Intimate Partner Abuse in Turkey: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Intimate partner abuse is very common among university students. Post-traumatic stress disorder is one of the most serious mental diseases caused by intimate partner abuse.The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of an internet-based psychosocial intervention based on Social Learning Theory and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy approaches on post-traumatic stress and growth in student nurses who had experienced intimate partner abuse.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Intimate partner abuse is very common among university students. Post-traumatic stress disorder is one of the most serious mental diseases caused by intimate partner abuse. An intervention with evidence-based applications to post-traumatic stress caused by intimate partner abuse and posttraumatic growth, using web-based applications that young people are familiar with, is considered important in order to protect the physical-mental health of university students, to increase their academic success, and to ensure that they establish healthy intimate partner relationships in the future.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of an internet-based psychosocial intervention based on Social Learning Theory and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy approaches on post-traumatic stress and growth in student nurses who had experienced intimate partner abuse.

Methods: The randomized controlled study that did not use blinding employed a 2x5 split-plot design. The universe of the study consisted of 371 student nurses. Students who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: experimental (n=17) and control (n=18). The internet-based psychosocial intervention, which was based on Social Learning Theory and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy techniques, was delivered individually and electronically to the students in the experimental group in eight sessions, each lasting up to 120 minutes, using videoconferencing. The Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) and the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PGTI) were used to measure the outcomes at the pre-test, post-test, 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.

Discussion: The internet-based psychosocial intervention was found to be effective in reducing post-traumatic stress and experiencing post-traumatic growth in student nurses who had been exposed to partner violence with these positive effects lasting for six months. This study is one of the first web-based randomized controlled studies to address post-traumatic stress and growth together in university students who were exposed to intimate partner violence. It is hoped that the results of the study will guide the research to be carried out in this context by internet intervention in the future.

* This research was carried out as part of the Ege University Institute of Health Sciences Psychiatric Nursing Doctoral Thesis.

Funding: No funding

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yozgat, Turkey
        • Bozok University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Must have access to a computer and internet
  • Must able to read and understand the Turkish language
  • Must experience intimate partner abuse
  • Must break up with the abuse perpetrator intimate partner
  • Must be on a current stable dose of psychiatric medication (for at least the last 3 months) or do not use psychiatric medication
  • Must display symptoms of post-traumatic stress (must get a score of 24 or more in the Impact of Events Scale-Revised)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have be currently married
  • Have a high risk of suicide
  • Have a psychotic symptom
  • Have a dissociative symptom
  • Have a risky alcohol and substance use
  • Have a receive a non-drug psychiatric treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Internet-based Psychosocial Intervention Group
The internet-based psychosocial intervention, which was based on Social Learning Theory and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy techniques, was delivered individually and electronically to the participants in the experimental group in eight sessions, each lasting up to 120 minutes, using videoconferencing.
Participants were provided psychoeducation on intimate partner abuse, psychological trauma, Social Learning Theory, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy methods. Intimate partner abuse and psychological trauma were discussed in the context of sociocultural factors. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy approaches were used to attempt to normalize intimate partner abuse, psychological trauma and their effects on participants. Participants were exposed to trauma gradually with record of sessions watching and imaginary exposure methods for reducing avoidance behaviours. Schemas, intermediate beliefs, and automatic thoughts of participants were studied using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy approaches and cognitive restructuring was fulfilled. The universality of mental pain, the meaning of life, the integrate trauma into life histories of participants, expectations for the future romantic relationships, and post traumatic growth were all discussed in accordance with the goals and values of participants.
No Intervention: Control Group
No intervention was applied to the participants in the control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-intervention post-traumatic stress levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: Pre-test (pre-internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic stress levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Impact of Event Scale-Revised has a scoring range of 0 to 88. The cut-off point for post-traumatic stress disorder in the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was determined as 24 points. The level of post-traumatic stress increases as the score obtained from Impact of Event Scale-Revised increases.
Pre-test (pre-internet-based psychosocial intervention)
Post-intervention post-traumatic stress levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: Post-test (immediately after the end of the internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic stress levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Impact of Event Scale-Revised has a scoring range of 0 to 88. The cut-off point for post-traumatic stress disorder in the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was determined as 24 points. The level of post-traumatic stress increases as the score obtained from Impact of Event Scale-Revised increases.
Post-test (immediately after the end of the internet-based psychosocial intervention)
1-month follow-up post-traumatic stress levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up (one month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic stress levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Impact of Event Scale-Revised has a scoring range of 0 to 88. The cut-off point for post-traumatic stress disorder in the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was determined as 24 points. The level of post-traumatic stress increases as the score obtained from Impact of Event Scale-Revised increases.
1-month follow-up (one month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
3-month follow-up post-traumatic stress levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up (three month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic stress levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Impact of Event Scale-Revised has a scoring range of 0 to 88. The cut-off point for post-traumatic stress disorder in the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was determined as 24 points. The level of post-traumatic stress increases as the score obtained from Impact of Event Scale-Revised increases.
3-month follow-up (three month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
6-month follow-up post-traumatic stress levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up (six month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic stress levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Impact of Event Scale-Revised has a scoring range of 0 to 88. The cut-off point for post-traumatic stress disorder in the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was determined as 24 points. The level of post-traumatic stress increases as the score obtained from Impact of Event Scale-Revised increases.
6-month follow-up (six month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
Pre-intervention post-traumatic growth levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: Pre-test (pre-internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic growth levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory.Posttraumatic Growth Inventory has a scoring range of 0 to 105. The cut-off point for post-traumatic growth of the scale was accepted as 63 points. The level of post-traumatic growth increases as the score obtained from Posttraumatic Growth Inventory increases.
Pre-test (pre-internet-based psychosocial intervention)
Post-intervention post-traumatic growth levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: Post-test (immediately after the end of the internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic growth levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory.Posttraumatic Growth Inventory has a scoring range of 0 to 105. The cut-off point for post-traumatic growth of the scale was accepted as 63 points. The level of post-traumatic growth increases as the score obtained from Posttraumatic Growth Inventory increases.
Post-test (immediately after the end of the internet-based psychosocial intervention)
1-month follow-up post-traumatic growth levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up (one month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic growth levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory.Posttraumatic Growth Inventory has a scoring range of 0 to 105. The cut-off point for post-traumatic growth of the scale was accepted as 63 points. The level of post-traumatic growth increases as the score obtained from Posttraumatic Growth Inventory increases.
1-month follow-up (one month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
3-month follow-up post-traumatic growth levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up (three month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic growth levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory.Posttraumatic Growth Inventory has a scoring range of 0 to 105. The cut-off point for post-traumatic growth of the scale was accepted as 63 points. The level of post-traumatic growth increases as the score obtained from Posttraumatic Growth Inventory increases.
3-month follow-up (three month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
6-month follow-up post-traumatic growth levels of participants in the experimental and control groups
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up (six month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)
The post-traumatic growth levels of the participants in the experimental and control groups were measured by the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory.Posttraumatic Growth Inventory has a scoring range of 0 to 105. The cut-off point for post-traumatic growth of the scale was accepted as 63 points. The level of post-traumatic growth increases as the score obtained from Posttraumatic Growth Inventory increases.
6-month follow-up (six month after internet-based psychosocial intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Şeyda Dülgerler, Assoc. Prof., Ege University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on The internet-based psychosocial intervention

Subscribe