- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05370534
Smartphone-Based Markerless Motion Capture for Orthopaedic Clinical Use
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Aim 1 will establish a testable AR-based smartphone app that measures clinically relevant lower-extremity motion components. Existing AR code will be adapted to identify and quantify hip, knee, and ankle range of motion in both the coronal and sagittal planes. Output will be produced directly to the phone display and can also be downloadable. Both single-motion and sequential-motion (gait) measures will be captured.
Aim 2 will then compare the app-based MCA to traditional gold standard MCA in healthy volunteers. A dedicated human biomechanics lab with capability for MCA with reflective markers will be utilized to test both MCA methods. Patients will perform a box jump and normal walking gait, and the measurements from both the standard marker-based MCA system and the smartphone markerless MCA system will be statistically compared.
Study Type
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- 18-65 years old
- No known spinal pathology
- No previous lower extremity surgery
- No significant cardiac history
Exclusion Criteria
- <18 or >65 years old
- Known spinal pathology
- Previous lower extremity surgery
- Significant cardiac history
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Study Population
The investigators anticipate validating two specific actions: a box jump and walking gait. Both will be captured in two planes, coronal and sagittal. Healthy patients without musculoskeletal complaints will be voluntarily enrolled to undergo motion capture with both methods, completed during the same visit to the UAMS Human Biomechanics Laboratory. Each patient will perform a box jump and walking gait using each of the two modalities. We anticipate 4 hrs will be required for each patient: 1 hr for setup before the patient arrives, 1 hr for testing, and 2 hrs for data cleaning and initial processing. This work will be performed at the UAMS Human Biomechanics Laboratory (off campus on Aldersgate Road), which is equipped for this type of analysis. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hip, Knee and Spine Measurements
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
angles
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David B Bumpass, MD, University of Arkansas
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Walker E, Nowacki AS. Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):192-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1513-8. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
- Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987 Dec;15(6):657-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419.
- Ueno R, Navacchia A, Schilaty ND, Myer GD, Hewett TE, Bates NA. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Loading Increases With Pivot-Shift Mechanism During Asymmetrical Drop Vertical Jump in Female Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Mar 9;9(3):2325967121989095. doi: 10.1177/2325967121989095. eCollection 2021 Mar.
- Thewlis D, Waters A, Solomon LB, Perilli E. Investigating in vivo knee volumetric bone mineral density and walking gait mechanics in healthy people. Bone. 2021 Feb;143:115662. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115662. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
- Kuchen DB, Eichelberger P, Baur H, Rutz E. Long-term follow-up after patellar tendon shortening for flexed knee gait in bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
- Kuai S, Guan X, Liu W, Ji R, Xiong J, Wang D, Zhou W. Prediction of the Spinal Musculoskeletal Loadings during Level Walking and Stair Climbing after Two Types of Simulated Interventions in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation. J Healthc Eng. 2019 Dec 17;2019:6406813. doi: 10.1155/2019/6406813. eCollection 2019.
- Camp CL, Loushin S, Nezlek S, Fiegen AP, Christoffer D, Kaufman K. Are Wearable Sensors Valid and Reliable for Studying the Baseball Pitching Motion? An Independent Comparison With Marker-Based Motion Capture. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Sep;49(11):3094-3101. doi: 10.1177/03635465211029017. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
- Di Paolo S, Zaffagnini S, Tosarelli F, Aggio F, Bragonzoni L, Grassi A, Della Villa F. A 2D qualitative movement assessment of a deceleration task detects football players with high knee joint loading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):4032-4040. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06709-2. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
- Tsakanikas VD, Gatsios D, Dimopoulos D, Pardalis A, Pavlou M, Liston MB, Fotiadis DI. Evaluating the Performance of Balance Physiotherapy Exercises Using a Sensory Platform: The Basis for a Persuasive Balance Rehabilitation Virtual Coaching System. Front Digit Health. 2020 Nov 27;2:545885. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.545885. eCollection 2020.
- Paloschi D, Bravi M, Schena E, Miccinilli S, Morrone M, Sterzi S, Saccomandi P, Massaroni C. Validation and Assessment of a Posture Measurement System with Magneto-Inertial Measurement Units. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 3;21(19):6610. doi: 10.3390/s21196610.
- Tamura H, Tanaka R, Kawanishi H. Reliability of a markerless motion capture system to measure the trunk, hip and knee angle during walking on a flatland and a treadmill. J Biomech. 2020 Aug 26;109:109929. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109929. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
- Wochatz M, Tilgner N, Mueller S, Rabe S, Eichler S, John M, Voller H, Mayer F. Reliability and validity of the Kinect V2 for the assessment of lower extremity rehabilitation exercises. Gait Posture. 2019 May;70:330-335. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
- Scano A, Chiavenna A, Malosio M, Molinari Tosatti L, Molteni F. Kinect V2 implementation and testing of the reaching performance scale for motor evaluation of patients with neurological impairment. Med Eng Phys. 2018 Jun;56:54-58. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
- McGinley JL, Baker R, Wolfe R, Morris ME. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009 Apr;29(3):360-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
- Tanaka R, Takimoto H, Yamasaki T, Higashi A. Validity of time series kinematical data as measured by a markerless motion capture system on a flatland for gait assessment. J Biomech. 2018 Apr 11;71:281-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 274321
- GM125503 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NIH COBRE through UArkansas)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.