Noise Reduction Preferences in Teenagers and Pre-teens

January 4, 2024 updated by: Sonova AG
Noise reduction preferences and blue tooth access to hearing aid streaming features will be evaluated in experienced hearing aid users age 10-17.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preferences for hearing aid noise reduction settings in users age 10 -17, as well as to evaluate preferences for accessing the hearing aid Bluetooth streaming programs for this population. Subjective preferences will be obtained by having the participants listen to a noisy scene with different levels of noise reduction, to which they are blinded, and rate their preference. Blinded objective speech performance testing will be completed by a) finding the signal-to-noise ratio at which participant can correctly repeat back 50% of the target words, and b) measuring the percent of words correctly repeated during a noisy listening task. These tasks will be done using different levels of noise reduction. Subjective preferences for accessing Bluetooth streaming will also be obtained by asking participants which method they prefer (phone, hearing aid, or touch control).

.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mild, moderate, or moderate-severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss
  • native English speakers with ability to communicate verbally
  • able to read and follow directions
  • access to smartphone and willing to download a hearing aid app
  • experienced hearing aid user (6+ months)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to follow verbal directions
  • unable to communicate verbally
  • unable to wear study devices for required home trials
  • active middle ear infection
  • unable to attend lab visits required for study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Participants will be fit with a commercially available hearing aid and tested using various strengths of the noise reduction feature.
Commercially available hearing aid with various noise reduction strengths

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Rating of Listening Effort Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 14 of study, visit 2
Participant will rate perceived listening effort during a speech in noise task with different levels of noise reduction. Participants will rate how easy the task seemed using a sliding scale with 100 increments between two verbal anchors: "it was very easy" to "it was not easy at all". Higher scores indicate higher perceived listening effort. A rating of "0" would indicate "it was very easy" to understand the speech while a rating of "100" would indicate "it was not easy at all" to understand the speech.
Day 14 of study, visit 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech Reception Threshold
Time Frame: Day 28, visit 3
The signal to noise ratio in which participant can correctly repeat 50% of key words at different levels of noise reduction, known as SNR50. A lower number is better, as it indicates that the words do not have to be presented at a much higher level than the noise in order for the person to understand 50% of the words. For example, an SNR of 2 dB means that the words are 2 dB louder than the noise, and SNR of 0 dB means that the words and the noise are at the same level, etc.
Day 28, visit 3
Physical Response Time
Time Frame: Day 14 of study, visit 2
Length of time(in milliseconds) it takes participant to respond physically by pressing a button while also performing a verbal task. Participants repeat the word they hear, while at the same time, are instructed to press a button if the word they hear is an object "bigger than a basketball". A higher response time may indicate increased listening effort.
Day 14 of study, visit 2
Subjective Preference Questionnaire for Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Settings
Time Frame: Day 1 of study, visit 1
A blinded paired comparison between two different settings of noise reduction (NR), while listening to a story presented in noise. Participants indicate whether they prefer listening to setting "A" or setting "B". Investigator will switch the settings so that participant is not aware of what the settings are. There will be a total of 18 trials; 12 which will compare OFF to either WEAK or STRONG, and six trials will compare WEAK to STRONG. The preferred setting will be determined by counting which setting is chosen most often from those six trials. The outcome measure data will report a count of participants who preferred OFF to their chosen setting, who preferred their chosen setting to OFF, and those who chose OFF and their preferred setting an equal number of times.
Day 1 of study, visit 1
Subjective Questionnaire on Preference for Accessing Bluetooth on Phone
Time Frame: Day 28, visit 3
Subjective questionnaire about streaming access preferences. Participants will indicate which method (Hearing aid push button, phone control, or tap control on hearing aid) for answering phone calls and listening to audio streaming on phone.
Day 28, visit 3
Verbal Response Accuracy
Time Frame: Day 14 of study, visit 2
Out of 25 monosyllabic words presented in noise at different levels of noise reduction, the number of words the participant correctly repeats,while also performing a visual task. No statistical analysis was performed for this test.
Day 14 of study, visit 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Phonak Hearing Aid

Subscribe