- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05372094
Noise Reduction Preferences in Teenagers and Pre-teens
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preferences for hearing aid noise reduction settings in users age 10 -17, as well as to evaluate preferences for accessing the hearing aid Bluetooth streaming programs for this population. Subjective preferences will be obtained by having the participants listen to a noisy scene with different levels of noise reduction, to which they are blinded, and rate their preference. Blinded objective speech performance testing will be completed by a) finding the signal-to-noise ratio at which participant can correctly repeat back 50% of the target words, and b) measuring the percent of words correctly repeated during a noisy listening task. These tasks will be done using different levels of noise reduction. Subjective preferences for accessing Bluetooth streaming will also be obtained by asking participants which method they prefer (phone, hearing aid, or touch control).
.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Vanderbilt University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- mild, moderate, or moderate-severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss
- native English speakers with ability to communicate verbally
- able to read and follow directions
- access to smartphone and willing to download a hearing aid app
- experienced hearing aid user (6+ months)
Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to follow verbal directions
- unable to communicate verbally
- unable to wear study devices for required home trials
- active middle ear infection
- unable to attend lab visits required for study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Participants will be fit with a commercially available hearing aid and tested using various strengths of the noise reduction feature.
|
Commercially available hearing aid with various noise reduction strengths
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Listening Effort Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 14 of study, visit 2
|
Participant will rate perceived listening effort during a speech in noise task with different levels of noise reduction.
Participants will rate how easy the task seemed using a sliding scale with 100 increments between two verbal anchors: "it was very easy" to "it was not easy at all".
Higher scores indicate higher perceived listening effort.
A rating of "0" would indicate "it was very easy" to understand the speech while a rating of "100" would indicate "it was not easy at all" to understand the speech.
|
Day 14 of study, visit 2
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Speech Reception Threshold
Time Frame: Day 28, visit 3
|
The signal to noise ratio in which participant can correctly repeat 50% of key words at different levels of noise reduction, known as SNR50.
A lower number is better, as it indicates that the words do not have to be presented at a much higher level than the noise in order for the person to understand 50% of the words.
For example, an SNR of 2 dB means that the words are 2 dB louder than the noise, and SNR of 0 dB means that the words and the noise are at the same level, etc.
|
Day 28, visit 3
|
|
Physical Response Time
Time Frame: Day 14 of study, visit 2
|
Length of time(in milliseconds) it takes participant to respond physically by pressing a button while also performing a verbal task.
Participants repeat the word they hear, while at the same time, are instructed to press a button if the word they hear is an object "bigger than a basketball".
A higher response time may indicate increased listening effort.
|
Day 14 of study, visit 2
|
|
Subjective Preference Questionnaire for Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Settings
Time Frame: Day 1 of study, visit 1
|
A blinded paired comparison between two different settings of noise reduction (NR), while listening to a story presented in noise.
Participants indicate whether they prefer listening to setting "A" or setting "B".
Investigator will switch the settings so that participant is not aware of what the settings are.
There will be a total of 18 trials; 12 which will compare OFF to either WEAK or STRONG, and six trials will compare WEAK to STRONG.
The preferred setting will be determined by counting which setting is chosen most often from those six trials.
The outcome measure data will report a count of participants who preferred OFF to their chosen setting, who preferred their chosen setting to OFF, and those who chose OFF and their preferred setting an equal number of times.
|
Day 1 of study, visit 1
|
|
Subjective Questionnaire on Preference for Accessing Bluetooth on Phone
Time Frame: Day 28, visit 3
|
Subjective questionnaire about streaming access preferences.
Participants will indicate which method (Hearing aid push button, phone control, or tap control on hearing aid) for answering phone calls and listening to audio streaming on phone.
|
Day 28, visit 3
|
|
Verbal Response Accuracy
Time Frame: Day 14 of study, visit 2
|
Out of 25 monosyllabic words presented in noise at different levels of noise reduction, the number of words the participant correctly repeats,while also performing a visual task.
No statistical analysis was performed for this test.
|
Day 14 of study, visit 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SRF-802
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHCompletedHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, MixedAustria, Germany, United Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedEar Diseases | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss Mixed | Hearing Disability | Conductive Hearing Loss | Conductive Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Conductive Hearing Loss, UnilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalNot yet recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterCompletedCochlear Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Truway Health, Inc.Enrolling by invitationSensorineural Hearing Loss | Tinnitus | Sudden Hearing Loss | Acoustic Trauma | Inner Ear Injury | Noise-Induced Hearing Loss | Vestibular DysfunctionUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, Mixed | Hearing Disorders in ChildrenUnited States
-
Wonju Severance Christian HospitalRecruitingHearing Loss, Sudden | Sudden Hearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural | SSNHL(Sudden Sensory Neural Hearing Loss)Korea, Republic of
-
Envoy Medical CorporationActive, not recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss (Disorder) | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound | Sensori-Neural DeafnessUnited States
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedConductive Hearing Loss | Conductive and Sensori-neural Hearing Loss in the Same Ear | Unilateral, Profound Sensori-neural Hearing LossUnited States
-
Frequency TherapeuticsCompletedHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Presbycusis | Noise Induced Hearing Loss | Sudden Hearing LossUnited States
Clinical Trials on Phonak Hearing Aid
-
Sonova AGCompleted
-
Sonova AGCompletedHearing Loss, Bilateral Sensorineural, ProgressiveSwitzerland
-
Sonova AGCompleted
-
Sonova AGArizona State UniversityCompletedHearing LossUnited States
-
Sonova AGCompletedHearing LossUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNot yet recruitingHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
-
University Hospital MuensterPhonak AG, SwitzerlandUnknownAuditory Processing DisorderGermany, Switzerland
-
Sonova AGCompletedHearing Loss, Bilateral or UnilateralUnited States