Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Obturated With Calcium Silicate Based Sealers

May 10, 2022 updated by: Fausto Zamparini, University of Bologna
The clinical use of a flowable premixed calcium-silicate bioceramic sealer used in association with warm carrier-based/single-cone technique will be compared with epoxy resin-based sealer with carrier-based technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Healthy consecutive patients (n= 109) requiring 141 root canal treatments were enrolled in this study and divided in 3 groups (Group 1: Ceraseal + single cone cold technique n=47. Group 2: Ceraseal + Carrier-based technique n=47. Group 3 AH Plus + Carrier based technique n=47).

Periapical X-rays were taken preoperatively, after root canal filling and after 6, 12 and 24 months. Two evaluators blindly assessed the Periapical Index (PAI) and sealer extrusion in the 3 groups (k =0.90). Healing rate and survival rate were also analysed.

Chi square tests was used to analyse significant differences among the groups. Multilevel analysis was performed to analyse the factors associated to healing status and survival status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 40125
        • Dental School University of Bologna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age 18-75 years
  2. no use of antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drug
  3. healthy status (ASA 1 or 2).
  4. Needing one or more root canal treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Teeth with less than 2 walls of structural integrity
  2. Wide apexes (>40 diameter)
  3. ASA > 3,
  4. Any pathology that could compromise bone healing or the immune response,
  5. pregnancy or breast feeding
  6. heavy smoking (>15 cigarettes/day), (Tverdal & Bjartveit 2006)
  7. exposure to radiation therapy focussed on the head and neck region and malignant disease directly involving the jaws.
  8. Lacks of occlusal contacts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Premixed Sealer + Single cone
Premixed flowable hydraulic calcium silicate sealer was applied with a a K File #15 that was inserted into the canal to reach the WL - 3mm and gently moved around the root canal walls. Then, gutta-percha points were gently inserted at the WL -0.5mm and compacted with lateral condensation/vertical condensation.
root canal filling with Ceraseal sealer
Experimental: Premixed Sealer + Thermafil
Premixed bioceramic sealer was applied and previously described. Pre-heated carrier was inserted in the canal at WL-0.5mm. The carrier excess was removed with a Thermacut bur.
root canal filling with Ceraseal sealer
Other: Sealer + Thermafil
Epoxy-resin-based sealer was mixed and immediately inserted into the root canal using a K File #15. Pre-heated carrier was inserted in the canal at WL -0.5mm. The carriers excess was removed with a bur.
root canal filling with Ceraseal sealer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healing rate
Time Frame: 24 months
Periapical index minor than 3 at the endline
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival rate
Time Frame: 24 months
presence of root canal treated tooth at the endline
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Clinical Trials on root canal filling with Ceraseal sealer

3
Subscribe