Examining the Effect of Different Filling Techniques on Healing in Lesional Teeth

Comparison of the Effect of Orthograde and Retrograde Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Application on Healing After Apical Resection in Teeth With Periapical Lesions

Microorganisms are an important factor in the development of periradicular diseases. The goal of non-surgical endodontic treatment is to eliminate microorganisms and their byproducts from the root canal system and to create an effective barrier between the root canal system and surrounding tissues. If there is no healing in the periradicular tissues after non-surgical endodontic treatment or if retreatment becomes impossible, surgical endodontic treatment is required. Apical resection is a surgical technique that involves removing the root tip of the tooth and closing the apical portion of the root canal system. An ideal retrograde filling material should be non-toxic, non-carcinogenic and biocompatible. It must also have dimensional stability and sealing properties. Amalgam, glass ionomer cements, and zinc oxide-eugenol based materials have been used for root end fillings in periapical surgery, but the desired success was not achieved. Today, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is preferred as a retrograde filling material due to its superior sealing properties, ability to harden in the presence of blood and moisture, antibacterial effects, biocompatibility and radiopacity.

In the researchers' study, the effect of apical resection after orthograde canal filling and retrograde canal filling during apical resection on postoperative recovery will be compared. In both canal filling techniques, Sure-Seal Root MTA (Sure Dent Corporation-Korea) will be used as the filling material. Sure-Seal Root MTA is a calcium silicate based paste that is typically pre-mixed and ready to apply, exhibits excellent physical properties and does not show shrinkage during the curing process. As the manufacturer states, it is hydrophilic, biocompatible, has ideal setting and working time.

Our faculty has piezosurgical ultrasonics (Mectron ®, Grassobbio BG, Italy). After the root tip resection is performed, the retrograde cavity will be prepared with Woodpecker ultrasonic tips (Guilin, China) compatible with this device. In our study using these materials and devices, a comparative analysis of the effects of different canal filling techniques on lesion healing and improvement in clinical symptoms will be made.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Apical Cyst
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: retrograde and orthograde root canal filling

Detailed Description

Periapical or periradicular lesions are barriers that restrict microorganisms and prevent their spread to surrounding tissues; microorganisms cause periapical lesions, either primary or secondary. Apical infections, if left untreated, can follow two different paths: First, the infection can create a path inside or outside the mouth, causing the pus to drain out. Secondly, infection within the canal; It may reach the periapical tissues and create a cavity surrounded by polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the bone, leading to the formation of inflammatory radicular cysts.

Inflammatory radicular cysts (IRCs) are chronic lesions that occur after the development of periapical granulomas (PGs). PGs and IRCs are thought to follow pulp infections as an inflammatory process at the periapical level. Although both conditions, PG and IRC, are clinically diagnosed as apical periodontitis (AP), they differ significantly histopathologically.

The majority of apical cysts are asymptomatic and may develop insidiously by being discovered incidentally during a routine x-ray examination as a large periapical radiolucency covering the apex of one or more teeth. By confirming that the lesion is a granuloma or cyst, a more definitive diagnosis is reached by histopathological examination. Although conventional radiographic methods cannot be used for the definitive diagnosis of periapical cysts, larger round or oval, well-circumscribed radiolucent images around the apex of the tooth are considered to be cystic lesions.

When the infection in the canal is successfully treated, apical cysts can regress by the apoptosis mechanism in the root canal without the need for surgical intervention. Researchers stated that incorrect histopathological diagnosis in early studies created the false impression that radicular cysts were more common, and that this methodological error led to the illusion that most cystic lesions in the periapex area healed after non-surgical root canal treatment. In conclusion, the authors suggested that true cysts may be less likely to heal with nonsurgical root canal treatment due to their inherently self-sustaining properties and may require surgical intervention. Whether true cysts heal after non-surgical root canal treatment is still a major debate.

Different retrograde canal filling materials have been tried in the literature, but today, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is most commonly used because it is more biocompatible and has a periapical healing-inducing effect. MTA; It is the first restorative material that allows cementum development and provides regeneration in periodontal ligament cells. In addition, histological sections taken from the periapical region of teeth with retrograde canal filling with MTA often showed new cementum formation not only on the resection surface but also directly on the MTA. For this reason, MTA is called bioactive material. Properties of MTA such as biocompatibility, sealing, and the capacity to increase the regeneration of pulp and periradicular tissues; It has increased the diversity of dental usage areas and clinical success rates, and has become the focus of attention of clinicians with this innovative structure. In comparative studies on retrograde filling materials, MTA has demonstrated an excellent tissue response with almost no inflammatory component.

There are few studies in the literature comparing the effects of two different canal filling techniques (orthograde, retrograde), which are currently frequently used, on postoperative recovery. There is no study comparing the long-term postoperative radiographic and clinical improvement levels of using MTA with different application techniques in teeth with periapical lesions with an indication for apical resection. The purpose of researchers' planned study is to compare and evaluate the healing effect of orthograde MTA application followed by resection in teeth with large periapical lesions and retrograde MTA application during apical resection operation.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 60
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: ERASLAN AKYÜZ; Phone Number: 0352 4447138; Email: ipekemamak@hotmail.com
• Study Contact Backup: Name: ÖZDEMİR; Phone Number: 0352 4447138

Study Locations

• Turkey
  • Kayseri, Turkey, 38039
    • Recruiting
    • Erciyes Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
    • Contact: ERASLAN AKYÜZ; Phone Number: 0352 4447138; Email: ipekemamak@hotmail.com

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Healthy volunteers without systemic disease between the ages of 18 and 65
• Single-rooted teeth with periapical lesions larger than 1 cm
• Patients who do not have any contraindications for the surgical procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Individuals with systemic diseases and allergic reactions
• Pregnancy and breastfeeding
• Severely damaged teeth
• Patients with contraindications for surgical operation

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Retrograde canal filling technique; Apical resection application after retrograde root canal filling	Device: retrograde and orthograde root canal filling; Apical resection application after root canal filling
Active Comparator: Orthograde canal filling technique; Apical resection application after orthograde root canal filling	Device: retrograde and orthograde root canal filling; Apical resection application after root canal filling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Comparison of lesion healing rate after apical resection using different root canal filling techniques	lesion healing rate	2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: TC Erciyes University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: ERASLAN AKYÜZ, BAŞ ARAŞTIRMACI; Study Director: TOPÇUOĞLU, YÜRÜTÜCÜ; Study Chair: ÖZDEMİR, YARDIMCI ARAŞTIRMACI

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 1, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): August 1, 2024
• Study Completion (Estimated): January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 18, 2024
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 22, 2024
• First Posted (Actual): April 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 25, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 22, 2024
• Last Verified: April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms; Cysts; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases; Periodontal Diseases; Mouth Diseases; Jaw Diseases; Periapical Diseases; Odontogenic Cysts; Jaw Cysts; Bone Cysts; Periodontal Cyst; Radicular Cyst
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2024/56

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No