Clinical Evaluation of Laminate Veneers With Coronal Post Versus Post and Core Foundation Restoration With Single Crown for Restoration of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth (Randomized Controlled Trial) "In-vivo Study"

October 15, 2017 updated by: Mohamed Ahmed Abdelrahman Elsadek, Cairo University
Clinical evaluation of Laminate veneers with coronal post versus post and core foundation restoration with single crown for restoration of endodontically treated anterior teeth (Randomized Controlled Trial) "In-vivo Study"

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. From 18-60 years old, should be able to read and sign the consent document.
  2. Ability to tolerate the restorative procedures (physical and psychological).
  3. Patients with anterior endodontically treated teeth indicated for coronal restoration:

    1. Good oral hygiene
    2. Minimum remaining coronal tooth height of 4 mm
    3. Normal functional occlusal stresses within physiological limits.
    4. Adequate crown/root ratio
    5. No signs and symptoms related to active periapical pathosis or endodontic failure.
  4. With no active periodontal or pulpal problems.
  5. Willing to return for follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Teeth not fully erupted as in young patients.
  2. Poor oral hygiene and lack of motivation
  3. Vital teeth
  4. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
  5. Excessive parafunctional stresses and bad habits like nail biting. 11
  6. The absence of sound enamel margins for the preparation
  7. Abnormally small teeth or with structural defects in enamel. 12
  8. Tooth mobility or inadequate crown/root ratio.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: laminate veneers with coronal posts
anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with laminate veneers with coronal posts
laminate veneer with coronal post
Other Names:
  • anterior endocrown
  • endolam
  • endolaminate
OTHER: post, core and crown
anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with post, core and crown
post,core and crown

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross Fracture
Time Frame: one year

: Alpha (A),Restoration is intact and fully retained. Bravo (B), Restoration is partially retained with some portion of the restoration still intact.

Charlie (C), Restoration is completely missing.

one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
marginal integrity
Time Frame: one year
Alpha (A), Visual inspection and explorer, the explorer does not catch when drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth, or, if the explorer does not catch, there is no visible crevice along the periphery of the restoration. Bravo (B), Visual inspection and explorer, the explorer catches and there is visible evidence of a crevice, which the explorer penetrates, indicating that the edge of the restoration does not adapt closely to the tooth structure. The dentin and/or the base is not exposed, and the restoration is not mobile. Charlie (C), Explorer, the explorer penetrates crevice defect extended to the dentino-enamel junction.
one year
marginal discoloration
Time Frame: one year
Alpha (A) Visual inspection, There is no visual evidence of marginal discoloration different from the color of the restorative material and from the color of the adjacent tooth structure. Bravo (B), Visual inspection, There is visual evidence of marginal discoloration at the junction of the tooth structure and the restoration, but the discoloration has not penetrated along the restoration in a pulpal direction. Charlie (C), Visual inspection, there is visual evidence of marginal discoloration at the junction of the tooth structure and the restoration that has penetrated along the restoration in a pulpal direction.
one year
color match
Time Frame: one year
Alpha (A) Visual inspection The restoration appears to match the shade and translucency of adjacent tooth tissues. Bravo (B), Visual inspection, the restoration does not match the shade and translucency of adjacent tooth tissues, but the mismatch is within the normal range of tooth shades. (Within normal range: Similar to silicate cement restorations for which the dentist did not quite succeed in matching tooth color by his choice among available silicate cement shades.) Charlie (C), visual inspection , the restoration does not match the shade and translucency of the adjacent tooth structure, and the mismatch is outside the normal range of tooth shades and translucency.
one year
caries
Time Frame: one year
Alpha (A) Visual inspection, the restoration is a continuation of existing anatomic form adjacent to the restoration. Bravo (B), Visual inspection, there is visual evidence of dark deep discoloration adjacent to the restoration (but not directly associated with cavosurface margins).
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBD-CU-2017-09-32

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Teeth

Clinical Trials on laminate veneer with coronal post

3
Subscribe