Deep Brain Stimulation for Idiopathic Craniofacial Dystonia: GPi or STN (MEIGES)

April 17, 2025 updated by: Jianguo Zhang, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Multicenter Evaluation of Deep Brain Stimulation for Idiopathic Craniofacial Dystonia: Globus Pallidus intErnus or Subthalamic Nucleus

MEIGES is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial with the primary hypothesis that, STN-DBS is non-inferior to GPi-DBS for motor symptoms improvements at 365 days postoperatively in patients with idiopathic craniofacial dystonia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Evaluating therapeutic effects of GPi-DBS vs. STN-DBS on patients with idiopathic craniofacial dystonia: Clinical data of patients at different treatment time points will be collected, using different clinical assessments. The main purpose is to assess whether STN-DBS is non-inferior to GPi-DBS for motor symptoms improvements at 365 days postoperatively in patients with idiopathic craniofacial dystonia.

Primary endpoints: Differences between the two groups in BFMDRS-M change scores in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS.

Secondary endpoints: Differences between the two groups in BFMDRS-M change scores in the stimulation state from before to 90, 180 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS. Differences between the two groups in BFMDRS-D, BDSI, JRS, MMSE, MoCA, HRSD, HAMA, SF-36 and programming parameters change scores in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jianguo Zhang, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: +86-13601294613
          • Email: zjguo73@126.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult subject (male or female, 18-75 years);
  2. Diagnosed with idiopathic craniofacial dystonia for more than 1 year, including at least one of the eye and oromandibular region. Cervical dystonia may be present;
  3. Treated with oral drugs or botulinum toxin injections, but with no satisfactory curative effect;
  4. Normal cognitive function with MMSE score ≥ 24;
  5. Informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Only cervical dystonia, or combined with dystonia in other parts of the body other than the cervical region;
  2. Diagnosed with other neuropsychiatric diseases(Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, etc.);
  3. History of brain surgery;
  4. Severe depression with HRSD score ≥ 35;
  5. Contraindications to neurosurgery(cerebral infarction, hydrocephalus, cerebral atrophy, sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, etc);
  6. Contraindications to CT or MRI scanning(claustrophobia, etc);
  7. pregnant or breastfeeding female, or has positive pregnancy test prior to randomization;
  8. Contraindications to general anesthesia (severe arrhythmia, severe anemia, abnormal liver and kidney function, etc.);
  9. Expected lifetime < 12 months;
  10. Currently receiving an investigational drug or device;
  11. Other circumstances that the investigator considers unsuitable to participate in this study or that may pose a significant risk to the patient (inability to understand or comply with research procedures and follow-up, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STN-DBS
The patients in this group will be treated with STN-DBS.
The patients will be treated with deep brain electrode placement of STN target under local and general anesthesia. Switching the system on: the stimulator will be switched on 3 weeks after surgery to allow time for the brain edema and "stun effect" to wear off. Postoperative medication: The subject taking medication in the past will continue the medication. If the subject with no medication before, will be required not to take medication related to dystonia.
Other Names:
  • subthalamic necleus-deep brain stimulation
Active Comparator: GPi-DBS
The patients in this group will be treated with GPi-DBS.
The patients will be treated with deep brain electrode implantation of GPi target under local and general anesthesia. Except that the surgical target was GPi, the operation process, stimulator switch-on time, and postoperative medication were the same as those in the STN-DBS group.
Other Names:
  • globus pallidus internus-deep brain stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-motor score (BFMDRS-M) difference Day 365
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-motor score (BFMDRS-M) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. BFMDRS-M contains 4 items of 0-40 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-motor score (BFMDRS-M) difference Day 90
Time Frame: 90 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-motor score (BFMDRS-M) in the stimulation state from before to 90 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. BFMDRS-M contains 4 items of 0-40 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
90 days postoperatively compared between groups
Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-motor score (BFMDRS-M) difference Day 180
Time Frame: 180 days postoperatively compared between groups]
Differences between the two groups in the change of Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-motor score (BFMDRS-M) in the stimulation state from before to 180 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. BFMDRS-M contains 4 items of 0-40 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
180 days postoperatively compared between groups]
Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-disability score (BFMDRS-D) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale-disability score (BFMDRS-D) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. BFMDRS-D contains 7 items of 0-30 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Blepharospasm disability index (BDSI) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Blepharospasm disability index (BDSI) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. BDSI contains 6 items of 0-4 (average socre) and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Jankovic rating scale (JRS) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Jankovic rating scale (JRS) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. JRS contains 2 items of 0-8 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. MMSE contains 30 questions of 0-30 and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. MoCA contains 8 modules of 0-30 and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Hamilton depression scale (HRSD) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Hamilton depression scale (HRSD) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. HRSD contains 24 items of 24-77 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. HAMA contains 14 items of 0-56 and higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Medical outcomes study shortform-36 (SF-36) difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in the change of medical outcomes study shortform-36 (SF-36) in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment. SF-36 contains 8 modules of 0-100 and higher scores indicate a better outcome.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Programming parameters difference
Time Frame: 365 days postoperatively compared between groups
Differences between the two groups in programming parameters change scores in the stimulation state from before to 365 days (±14 days) after STN-DBS and GPi-DBS treatment, including total electrical energy delivered (TEED), contact, voltage, pulse width and frequency.
365 days postoperatively compared between groups

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deep Brain Stimulation

Clinical Trials on STN-DBS

Subscribe