- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05420038
Do Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Headphones Improve the Quality of Care in Hearing Impaired Patients?
Participants will be recruited by performing chart reviews of patients to be seen at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston Ophthalmology and Optometry Clinic. A sample size of at least 30 patients is needed (60 eyes). Patients aged 55 and higher will be further evaluated to meet the inclusion criteria. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be provided with informed consent to participate in the study before their office visit. Patients will receive a consent briefing then asked to sign and date the informed consent form. Participants will then be randomized to undergo an eye exam and refractive exam with noise cancelling Bluetooth headphones for one eye and without for the other eye. Participants will fill out a written survey asking them to rate the quality of the eye exam with and without headphones.
Primary aim: Assess the quality improvement of Ophthalmic exam in geriatric patients with hearing loss with use of noise cancelling headphones with Bluetooth feature.
Secondary aims: 1)Compare the response to the standardized questions with and without Bluetooth noise cancelling headphones to determine their effectiveness in conducting Ophthalmic refractive exam.
2) Explore the ease of conducting refractive exam as reported by provider.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Initial screening in this study will be conducted by performing chart reviews of the patients to be seen at University of Texas Medical Branch ophthalmology and optometry clinics between dates 05/09/2022 and 12/15/2022. Potential subjects will be provided with details about the study through debriefing about the informed consent before the start of their visit at University of Texas Medical Branch clinics. An option to participate in the study will be provided for recruitment by the principal investigator and the co-investigators. If potential subjects are not patients of the investigator or patients of the study team members, they will not be contacted by study staff unless they have been informed of the study by their medical provider and expressed an interest in receiving more information on the study or wish to enroll in the study. A sample size of at least 30 patients is needed (60 eyes). Patients aged 55 and higher will be further evaluated to meet the inclusion criteria. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be provided with informed consent to participate in the study before their office visit. Patients will receive a consent briefing from the principal investigator or the co-investigators regarding the purpose of the study, number of people taking part in the study, procedures involved in the study, possible risks, potential benefits, reimbursement, alternative treatment, consent to leave study at any time, protection of patient information and privacy, and contact information for questions regarding the study. They will then be asked to sign and date the informed consent form. The signed consent forms will be stored in a locked file cabinet in room 3.420C of the University of Texas Medical Branch University Eye Clinic building. Patients who consent to participate in this study will then be randomized to undergo an eye exam and refractive exam with noise cancelling Bluetooth headphones for one eye and without for the other eye. The order in which the headphones are used will also be randomized by flipping a coin. Lastly, patients will fill out a written survey with a 3-point Likert scale with the following question:
How do you rate the quality of your eye exam today with headphones as compared to without headphones? 1) Better 2) No difference 3) Worse Primary aim: Assess the quality improvement of Ophthalmic exam in geriatric patients with hearing loss with use of noise cancelling headphones with Bluetooth feature.
Secondary aims: 1) Compare the response to the standardized questions with and without Bluetooth noise cancelling headphones to determine their effectiveness in conducting Ophthalmic refractive exam.
2) Explore the ease of conducting refractive exam as reported by provider.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
- University of Texas Medical Branch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
- Adults;
- Elderly;
- University of Texas Medical Branch Ophthalmology and Optical clinic patients.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants are patients of University of Texas Medical Branch Ophthalmology and Optical clinics;
- patients of investigators;
- aged 55 years and above;
- participants with moderate hearing impairment or worse at baseline hearing grade of limited or impaired based on World Health Organization (WHO) hearing loss guidelines;
- participants with documented history of hearing loss;
- participants with no corrective procedures performed for hearing loss.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with mild to no hearing impairment at baseline reported as hearing grade fair, good or excellent on the Sound-Check hearing test;
- participants with history of corrective procedure performed for hearing loss;
- participants with cognitive impairment;
- participants with visual impairment of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/100 or worse in either eye or patients with monocular vision;
- participants from vulnerable populations, such as prisoners.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Do Bluetooth Noise Cancelling Headphones Improve the Quality of Care in Hearing Impaired Patients?
Time Frame: 8 months
|
Patients will fill out a written survey with a 3-point Likert scale with the following question: "How do you rate the quality of your eye exam today with headphones as compared to without headphone?
1) Better 2) No difference 3) Worse"
|
8 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Praveena K Gupta, PhD, University of Texas
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. Erratum In: Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):e38.
- Chodosh J, Goldfeld K, Weinstein BE, Radcliffe K, Burlingame M, Dickson V, Grudzen C, Sherman S, Smilowitz J, Blustein J. The HEAR-VA Pilot Study: Hearing Assistance Provided to Older Adults in the Emergency Department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1071-1078. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17037. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
- Sacco G, Gonfrier S, Teboul B, Gahide I, Prate F, Demory-Zory M, Turpin JM, Vuagnoux C, Genovese P, Schneider S, Guerin O, Guevara N. Clinical evaluation of an over-the-counter hearing aid (TEO First(R)) in elderly patients suffering of mild to moderate hearing loss. BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jul 9;16:136. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0304-4.
- Bainbridge KE, Wallhagen MI. Hearing loss in an aging American population: extent, impact, and management. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:139-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182510.
- Nash SD, Cruickshanks KJ, Huang GH, Klein BE, Klein R, Nieto FJ, Tweed TS. Unmet hearing health care needs: the Beaver Dam offspring study. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):1134-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301031. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
- Bentler R, Wu YH, Kettel J, Hurtig R. Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies. Int J Audiol. 2008 Aug;47(8):447-60. doi: 10.1080/14992020802033091.
- World Health Organization. Report of the informal working group on prevention of deafness and hearing impairment Programme planning, Geneva, 18-21 June 1991.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-0079
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hearing Impairment
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillMed-El CorporationCompletedHigh Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Impairment | Hearing Disorders in ChildrenUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHearing Impairment, SensorineuralUnited States
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedHearing Impairment, Conductive | Deafness Unilateral | Hearing Impaired (Partially)Denmark
-
CochlearAvaniaCompletedHearing Impairment, SensorineuralAustralia
-
University of Southern DenmarkInnovation Fund Denmark; William Demant FondenRecruitingHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Impairment, SensorineuralDenmark
-
CochlearTerminatedHearing Impairment, SensorineuralArgentina
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneCochlear; Stiftung Besser HörenTerminatedHearing-ImpairmentSwitzerland
-
University College, LondonCompletedFrequency Compression | Severe-profound Hearing Impairment
-
King Saud UniversityRecruitingNutrition, Healthy | Profound Hearing ImpairmentSaudi Arabia