Electrical Intra-cutaneous Half-sine Stimulation for Optimized Preferential C-fiber Activation

November 27, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Electrical Intra-cutaneous Half-sine Stimulation for Optimized Preferential C-fiber Activation in an Established Model of Evoked Pain, Hyperalgesia and Allodynia in Humans (25ms HS Stimulation)

This exploratory study is to improve an established pain model by a new stimulation profile that allows preferential activation of C fibers that are of main clinical interest in chronic pain and also to generate a stable secondary hyperalgesia, which is of particular interest in the actual research of acute and chronic pain. It is to investigate if the specific activation of afferent sensory fibers and expected lower current intensities makes it more comfortable for the participant as motor neuron activation is much less pronounced at low current intensities. Therefore it compares the area under the curve (AUC) of hyperalgesia during electrical, intracutaneous 25 ms half-sine wave stimulation at a pain level of the numeric rating scale (NRS) of 6 out of 10 for 65 minutes compared to 500 µs rectangular pulses.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nociceptors in the epidermis are responsible for peripheral pain perception. Mechanical, thermal as well as chemical stimuli can trigger action potentials in nociceptors and thereby pain. Regarding pain, polymodal and "silent" C-fibers are of special interest. Slower depolarisation via sine and half-sine currents preferentially stimulate C-fibers compared to rectangular shaped currents. This study is to compare the development of central sensitization comparing the half-sine wave and the rectangular stimulation, hypothesizing that preferential C fiber stimulation through half-sine currents facilitate the development of secondary hyperalgesia.

This exploratory study is to improve an established pain model by a new stimulation profile that allows preferential activation of C fibers that are of main clinical interest in chronic pain and also to generate a stable secondary hyperalgesia, which is of particular interest in the actual research of acute and chronic pain. It is to investigate if the specific activation of afferent sensory fibers and expected lower current intensities makes it more comfortable for the participant as motor neuron activation is much less pronounced at low current intensities. Therefore it compares the area under the curve (AUC) of hyperalgesia during electrical, intracutaneous 25 ms half-sine wave stimulation at a pain level of the numeric rating scale (NRS) of 6 out of 10 for 65 minutes compared to 500 µs rectangular pulses.

Every volunteer will have two appointments. There will be a "washout" period of at least two weeks between the two appointments. On each day two microdialysis catheters containing internally a stainless steel wire will be inserted intracutaneously on the volar surface of the adominant forearm for a length of approximately 10 mm and at a distance of 5 mm. Before insertion, the catheters are filled with 0.9% saline and after insertion a continuous flow of 0.4 μl/min will be ensured by a syringe pump (Perfusor®) to facilitate conduction and to protect the tissue from potential local pH changes by the direct current. Alternating polarity of the both pulses is used to ensure charge-balanced stimulation.

It is randomly assigned which current form is applied on the first and on the second trial. Subsequently, the stainless steel wire serving as electrodes of the current generator (for 25 ms half-sine stimulation the Digitimer DS5; Digitimer Ltd, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; and for 500 µs rectangular stimulation the Digitimer DS7A; Digitimer Ltd, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom) are connected. The rectangular pulses are generated by the Digitimer DS7A, which works in combination with a pulse generator (PG 1, Rimkus Medizintechnik, Parsdorf, Germany)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Basel (USB)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults (18 - 65 years old, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I or II)
  • BMI between 18.5 until 25 kg/m2
  • Able to understand the study and the NRS scale
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Regular intake of medications or drugs potentially interfering with pain sensation (analgesics, opioids, antihistamines, calcium and potassium channel blockers, serotonin / noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, corticosteroids)
  • Neuropathy
  • Chronic pain
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Dermatological disease as Atopic Dermatitis
  • Psychiatric disease
  • Pregnancy / Lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: First: half-sine wave stimulation; Second: rectangular shaped stimulation

First appointment:

Intracutaneously applied electrical 25 ms half-sine wave stimulation with 2 Hz frequency.

Second appointment:

Intracutaneously applied electrical 500 µs rectangular shaped stimulation with 2 Hz frequency.

Part I: Threshold detection and Flare response: 6 pulses of 25 ms half-sine are given at 2 Hz each, increasing current intensity (mA) until detection threshold, pain threshold and pain level (3 out of 10 NRS) are reached. Determined intensity values reapplied during 214 impulses. Line scan to visualize changes in local skin blood flow done. Part II: Hyperalgesia, Allodynia, Pain and flare response of 65 minutes. Baseline assessment of local skin perfusion and spatial extent of allodynia by using cotton swab and pinprick hyperalgesia. Current intensity is reapplied, adjusted until pain level of 6 reached. After 5 minutes axon reflex flare, allodynia and secondary hyperalgesia are measured and repeated proximal every 10 minutes with last measurement after 65 minutes. In first 15 minutes current intensity is adapted to maintain NRS level of 6. During this 65 minutes' period, 25 ms half-sine is administered continuously.
Part I: Threshold detection and Flare response: 6 pulses of 500 µs rectangular shaped stimulation are given at 2 Hz each, increasing current intensity (mA) until detection threshold, pain threshold and pain level (3 out of 10 NRS) are reached. Determined intensity values reapplied during 214 impulses. Line scan to visualize changes in local skin blood flow done. Part II: Hyperalgesia, Allodynia, Pain and flare response of 65 minutes. Baseline assessment of local skin perfusion and spatial extent of allodynia by using cotton swab and pinprick hyperalgesia. Current intensity is reapplied, adjusted until pain level of 6 reached. After 5 minutes axon reflex flare, allodynia and secondary hyperalgesia are measured and repeated proximal every 10 minutes with last measurement after 65 minutes. In first 15 minutes current intensity is adapted to maintain NRS level of 6. During this 65 minutes' period, 500 µs rectangular shaped stimulation is administered continuously.
Active Comparator: First: rectangular shaped stimulation; Second: half-sine wave stimulation

First appointment:

Intracutaneously applied electrical 500 µs rectangular shaped stimulation with 2 Hz frequency.

Second appointment:

Intracutaneously applied electrical 25 ms half-sine wave stimulation with 2 Hz frequency.

Part I: Threshold detection and Flare response: 6 pulses of 25 ms half-sine are given at 2 Hz each, increasing current intensity (mA) until detection threshold, pain threshold and pain level (3 out of 10 NRS) are reached. Determined intensity values reapplied during 214 impulses. Line scan to visualize changes in local skin blood flow done. Part II: Hyperalgesia, Allodynia, Pain and flare response of 65 minutes. Baseline assessment of local skin perfusion and spatial extent of allodynia by using cotton swab and pinprick hyperalgesia. Current intensity is reapplied, adjusted until pain level of 6 reached. After 5 minutes axon reflex flare, allodynia and secondary hyperalgesia are measured and repeated proximal every 10 minutes with last measurement after 65 minutes. In first 15 minutes current intensity is adapted to maintain NRS level of 6. During this 65 minutes' period, 25 ms half-sine is administered continuously.
Part I: Threshold detection and Flare response: 6 pulses of 500 µs rectangular shaped stimulation are given at 2 Hz each, increasing current intensity (mA) until detection threshold, pain threshold and pain level (3 out of 10 NRS) are reached. Determined intensity values reapplied during 214 impulses. Line scan to visualize changes in local skin blood flow done. Part II: Hyperalgesia, Allodynia, Pain and flare response of 65 minutes. Baseline assessment of local skin perfusion and spatial extent of allodynia by using cotton swab and pinprick hyperalgesia. Current intensity is reapplied, adjusted until pain level of 6 reached. After 5 minutes axon reflex flare, allodynia and secondary hyperalgesia are measured and repeated proximal every 10 minutes with last measurement after 65 minutes. In first 15 minutes current intensity is adapted to maintain NRS level of 6. During this 65 minutes' period, 500 µs rectangular shaped stimulation is administered continuously.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary hyperalgesia measured by the area under the curve (AUCHyperHS)
Time Frame: 65 minutes from start of stimulation until stop of stimulation
Difference between the AUC of secondary hyperalgesia during 25ms half-sine wave stimulation (AUCHyperHS) at pain level NRS 6 for 65 minutes and the AUC of secondary hyperalgesia measured during 500µs rectangular shaped stimulation (AUCHyperRect) at pain level NRS 6 for 65 minutes
65 minutes from start of stimulation until stop of stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of pulses needed to reach 25% of the final extent of the flare response
Time Frame: approx. 65 minutes at each intervention day (first appointment and second appointment)
The number of pulses needed to reach 25% of the final extent of the flare response (measured with a laser Doppler line scan while applying 214 impulses in total) at detection and pain threshold and at pain level NRS 3.
approx. 65 minutes at each intervention day (first appointment and second appointment)
Needed time (in minutes) to generate 50% of the final extent of secondary hyperalgesia.
Time Frame: approx. 65 minutes at each intervention (first appointment and second appointment)
Difference between the needed time (in minutes) to generate 50% of the final extent of secondary hyperalgesia during 25ms half-sine wave stimulation and during 500µs rectangular shaped stimulation.
approx. 65 minutes at each intervention (first appointment and second appointment)
Current intensity needed to reach same pain level (NRS 6)
Time Frame: approx. 65 minutes at each intervention day (first appointment and second appointment)
Difference of the amount of current intensity needed to reach same pain level (NRS 6) after adaption during the first 15 minutes of stimulation between half-sine and rectangular currents (0 = no pain and 10 = maximum tolerable pain).
approx. 65 minutes at each intervention day (first appointment and second appointment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tobias Schneider, Dr. med., Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Basel (USB)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Perception

3
Subscribe