The Eye Patch and Headset on Sleep Quality, Anxiety, Fear and Vital Signs

February 10, 2023 updated by: Zülfünaz ÖZER, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University

The Effect of Eye Patch and Headset on Sleep Quality, Anxiety, Fear and Vital Signs in Intensive Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

This study was planned to investigate the effects of eye patch and headphones on sleep quality, anxiety, fear and vital signs in coronary intensive care unit patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In intensive care units, it can be much easier to change the environment perception of patients with simple tools such as headphones and sleep bands, rather than changing the environment of the patients. The use of sleep bands and headphones, which are non-pharmacological methods, can reduce sleep deprivation by changing the environmental perception of the patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34340
        • Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being 18 years or older,
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II and III,
  • Not having received any general anaesthesia for the previous 24 hours,
  • Not having received any sedative medications or opioids for the past 24 hours,
  • Not having a verbal communication disability (hearing and speaking),
  • Absence of pain,
  • Not having a previously diagnosed sleep disorder,
  • Not having psychiatric problems,
  • Not having a cognitive problem,
  • Being healthy enough to put on and take off earplugs independently, in addition to wearing an eye mask and removing it when necessary, and continuing to be hospitalized for at least three days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with delirium (Intensive care delirium screening checklist >=5),
  • Unconscious (Glasgow coma scale<13),
  • Presence of additional chronic diseases,
  • Having consumed coffee, alcohol and hypnotic drugs at least 12 hours before the study,
  • Patients whose condition suddenly worsened,
  • Those who cannot use earplugs and eye masks effectively at night,
  • Those who voluntarily withdrew from the study and were transferred from the intensive care unit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Eye patch and headphones
Patients in the experimental group will be asked to use an eye mask and earplugs from 22:30 to 6:30 in the morning on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd nights.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
Routine maintenance will be applied

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (Fear)
Time Frame: the first day after receiving randomisation
Patients are asked to show the severity of their fear on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.
the first day after receiving randomisation
Visual Analog Scale (Anxiety)
Time Frame: the first day after receiving randomisation
Patients are asked to show the severity of their anxiety on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.
the first day after receiving randomisation
Vital Signs Follow-up Form
Time Frame: the first day after receiving randomisation
This form was created by the researcher in order to record the systolic-diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate (pulse), values of the patient who was applied an eye patch or earphone at night.
the first day after receiving randomisation
The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire
Time Frame: the first day after receiving randomisation
This brief five-item questionnaire was used to evaluate perceived sleep depth, sleep latency (time to fall asleep), number of awakenings, efficiency (percentage of time awake), and sleep quality. It also includes a sixth item evaluating perceived night-time noise. Each item is evaluated on a scale of 0-100 with a visual analogue scale technique. A score of 0-25 indicates very poor quality sleep, whereas a score of 76-100 indicates very good sleep quality.
the first day after receiving randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (Fear)
Time Frame: 4. days
Patients are asked to show the severity of their fear on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.
4. days
Visual Analog Scale (Anxiety)
Time Frame: 4. days
Patients are asked to show the severity of their anxiety on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.
4. days
Vital Signs Follow-up Form
Time Frame: 4. days
This form was created by the researcher in order to record the systolic-diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate (pulse), values of the patient who was applied an eye patch or earphone at night.
4. days
The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4. days
This brief five-item questionnaire was used to evaluate perceived sleep depth, sleep latency (time to fall asleep), number of awakenings, efficiency (percentage of time awake), and sleep quality. It also includes a sixth item evaluating perceived night-time noise. Each item is evaluated on a scale of 0-100 with a visual analogue scale technique. A score of 0-25 indicates very poor quality sleep, whereas a score of 76-100 indicates very good sleep quality.
4. days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zülfünaz Özer, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 20, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 15, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 8991

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intensive Care Unit Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Eye patch and headphones

Subscribe