Acute Effects of AMPS on Cardiovascular, Functional Capacity and Postural Control in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

April 27, 2026 updated by: Antonio Roberto Zamunér, Universidad Católica del Maule

Acute Effects of Automated Mechanical Peripheral Stimulation on Cardiovascular, Functional Capacity and Postural Control in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Considering that Parkinson's Disease (PD) can significantly compromise functional mobility and cardiovascular system in patients with PD, therapies aimed at improving these aspects, mainly by non-pharmacological and non-invasive methods, are paramount. This clinical trial will study the acute effects of plantar stimulation using a therapy called automated peripheral mechanical stimulation (AMPS) on cardiovascular and functional mobility in patients with PD.

The hypothesis of this study is that one single session will be effective in improving, acutely, the cardiovascular system and functional capacity in patients with PD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maule Region
      • Talca, Maule Region, Chile, 3469001
        • Universidad Católica del Maule - Campus San Miguel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Scoring 1 to 3 on the Hoehn and Yhar scale
  • Pharmacological treatment unchanged for at least 30 days prior the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of cognitive decline, based on the results of the Mini Mental State Examination
  • Cardiorespiratory, neuromuscular and musculoskeletal diseases not related to PD
  • Sensory peripheral neuropathy, diabetes or any other disease known to promote autonomic dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AMPS first, then SHAM
Participants will receive first one session of automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) with intensity at the pain threshold. Then, after a 2-week washout, they will receive one session of a simulated automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (SHAM) with intensity at the sensory threshold.
Automated mechanical pressure reaching the pain threshold in four specific points at the foots soles
Other Names:
  • Mechanical somatosensory stimulation
  • Gondola
Automated mechanical pressure reaching the sensory threshold in four specific points at the foots soles
Sham Comparator: SHAM first, then AMPS
Participants will receive first one session of simulated automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (SHAM) with intensity at the sensory threshold. Then, after a 2-week washout, they will receive one session of automated mechanical peripheral stimulation (AMPS) with intensity at the pain threshold.
Automated mechanical pressure reaching the pain threshold in four specific points at the foots soles
Other Names:
  • Mechanical somatosensory stimulation
  • Gondola
Automated mechanical pressure reaching the sensory threshold in four specific points at the foots soles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed up and go
Time Frame: 1 hour
Time spent for the participant to rise from a standard chair without armrests, walk 3 meters straight at their preferred speed, turn, walk back to the chair and sit down again. Participants will perform the test twice and the lowest total duration will be considered as the outcome. The outcome measure is assessed as a difference or change from baseline to immediately after the intervention (about 1 hour from baseline assessment).
1 hour
Center of Pressure
Time Frame: 1 hour
Stabilometric variables of the center of pressure assessed using a 3D Force Plate (Kistler, US). Outcomes include anteroposterior and mediolateral velocity, root mean square and area) of the center of pressure. The outcome measure is assessed as a difference or change from baseline to immediately after the intervention (about 1 hour from baseline assessment).
1 hour
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: 1 hour
R-R intervals (time between every electrocardiogram R waves) will be recorded using a Polar V800 (Polar Electro Oy, Finland) and its variability will be quantified using linear and nonlinear methods. The outcome measure is assessed as a difference or change from baseline to immediately after the intervention (about 1 hour from baseline assessment).
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tinetti Test
Time Frame: 1 hour
Participants will be asked to: 1) firmly sit on a chair without armrests for at least 10 s; 2) stand up freely and keep the position for at least 10 s; 3) close the eyes during orthostatic position for at least 5 s; 4) control balance keeping the eyes closed while nudged by the clinician; 5) open the eyes and maintain upright position for at least 10 s; 6) perform a 360º turn around himself/herself; 7) sit down on the chair; and 8) walk as straight as possible for at least 10 m. The Tinetti test total score ranges from 0 to 28. The lower the score on the Tinetti test, the lower the functional mobility and the higher the risk of falling. The outcome measure is assessed as a difference or change from baseline to immediately after the intervention (about 1 hour from baseline assessment).
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio R Zamunér, PhD, Universidad Católica del Maule

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Participant data will be shared upon request at the end of the study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Automated mechanical peripheral stimulation

Subscribe