Anticoagulation Therapy Timing in Atrial Fibrillation After Acute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma (ATTAACH)

May 31, 2024 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Anticoagulation Therapy Timing in Atrial Fibrillation After Acute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma (ATTAACH)

Subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common disorder that typically results from head trauma and has increased in prevalence in recent decades. Acute subdural hematomas (aSDH) are found in up to one-third of patients with severe traumatic brain injury and are associated with an unfavorable outcome in the majority of cases. Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) commonly occur in the elderly population which has highest risk for developing cSDH with or without minor head injuries. The combination of the aging population, higher incidence of disease in progressively older patients, and high morbidity and mortality renders SDH a growing problem within Canada with significant health-systems burden. SDH commonly recurs even after successful surgical drainage. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common medical comorbidities in patients with cSDH, especially in the elderly, with an expected doubling of its prevalence by the year 2030. Patients with AF are at recognized risk for stroke, so anticoagulation is indicated for almost all patients. Anticoagulation is held prior to SDH drainage to minimize the risk of intraoperative and early postoperative bleeding. After surgery, the risk of SDH recurrence must be balanced against the risk of thromboembolic events such as stroke when deciding the timing of resuming anticoagulation. Currently the decision on when to restart anticoagulation after SDH is made by clinicians on an individual patient basis without any high-quality evidence to guide this decision. The two most common approaches are: 1) early resumption of anticoagulation after 30 days of diagnosis or surgery; and 2) delayed resumption of anticoagulation after 90 days of diagnosis or surgery. However, which of these approaches leads to the best functional outcomes for patients is unclear. Our pilot RCT will test the feasibility of comparing these 2 approaches in a larger multicenter RCT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years of age
  2. Any SDH, defined as either acute or encapsulated partially liquefied hematoma in the subdural space diagnosed on a CT scan
  3. Can have surgical drainage (either burr hole or craniotomy) for aSDH and cSDH
  4. On therapeutic anticoagulation (DOAC or warfarin) as standard of care therapy prior to presentation for stroke prophylaxis secondary to AF

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. aSDH requiring decompressive craniectomy
  2. Mechanical heart valve or moderate to severe mitral stenosis
  3. Known chronic coagulopathy (elevated INR >1.5 or PTT>40s after anticoagulant reversal, thrombocytopenia with platelet count <50x109/L) that is not amenable to reversal
  4. >37 days has elapsed since initial diagnosis without recruitment into the trial
  5. Active gastroduodenal ulcer, urogenital or respiratory tract hemorrhage
  6. Known pregnancy or breastfeeding
  7. Indication for therapeutic anticoagulation other than AF
  8. Pre-randomization brain CT at 2-4 weeks after initial diagnosis or surgery date reveals significant recurrence requiring surgical drainage
  9. Known to be non-compliant with prior anticoagulant
  10. MRP decides to restart Warfarin (as opposed to DOACs) as prophylactic anticoagulant as part of standard therapy for the patient after cSDH or aSDH

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Early resumption of anticoagulation
The standard of care DOAC at appropriate standard dose assigned by the MRP will start at day 30 +/- 7 after diagnosis of acute or chronic subdural hematoma.
Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban or Edoxaban at standard dose as recommended by the MRP
Active Comparator: Delayed resumption of anticoagulation
The standard of care DOAC at appropriate standard dose assigned by the MRP will start at day 90 +/- 14 after diagnosis of acute or chronic subdural hematoma.
Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban or Edoxaban at standard dose as recommended by the MRP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of participants enrolled for each participating institution, measured as the rate of consent for patients meeting eligibility criteria in one year per institution. Reasons for non-enrollment of eligible patients will be recorded
1 year
Implementation of study protocol
Time Frame: Study completion ~2.5 years
The proportion of enrolled participants who have completed follow-up measures at 90 days with complete recording of the functional outcome degree of disability
Study completion ~2.5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome - Degree of disability
Time Frame: 90 days
Level of disability measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS is a core instrument used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living that is sensitive to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. It is a clinician-reported measure and widely applied for evaluating stroke patient outcomes. It is a 7-level ordered categorical scale with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms/disability) to 6 (death). The analysis will be categorized as favourable outcome (scores 0-3) versus unfavourable outcome (scores 4-6)
90 days
Functional outcome - Degree of disability
Time Frame: 180 days
Level of disability measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS is a core instrument used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living that is sensitive to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. It is a clinician-reported measure and widely applied for evaluating stroke patient outcomes. It is a 7-level ordered categorical scale with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms/disability) to 6 (death). The analysis will be categorized as favourable outcome (scores 0-3) versus unfavourable outcome (scores 4-6)
180 days
Functional outcome - Stroke-related neurologic deficit
Time Frame: 90 days
Measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) which is a 15-item impairment scale. It groups scores into categories based on severity, ranging from mild to very severe, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of impairment
90 days
Functional outcome - Stroke-related neurologic deficit
Time Frame: 180 days
Measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) which is a 15-item impairment scale. It groups scores into categories based on severity, ranging from mild to very severe, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of impairment
180 days
Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: Continuous, baseline to 180 days
The composite outcome of clinically-important intracranial hemorrhage defined by: 1) any increase in volume of blood in the CT of at least 33%; 2) need for surgical evacuation of SDH or repeat surgical evacuation; 3) death directly related to enlarging SDH or new parenchymal bleed; 4) symptomatic bleeding in a critical non-intracranial region
Continuous, baseline to 180 days
Incidence of thromboembolic events
Time Frame: Continuous, baseline to 180 days
Composite outcome of clinically-important thromboembolic events defined as any of: 1) symptomatic TIA; 2) symptomatic objectively-confirmed ischemic stroke; 3) symptomatic, objectively-confirmed non-CNS systemic embolism; 4) objectively proven VTE; 5) all death directly or indirectly caused by a thrombotic event
Continuous, baseline to 180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Farhad Pirouzmand, MD, MSc, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant starting at Day 30

Subscribe