Integrating Cultural Aspects Into Diabetes Education (INCLUDE)

March 6, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

INCLUDE: INtegrating CuLtUral Aspects Into Diabetes Education

The goal of this study is to examine the efficacy of the video-based Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) + Community-supported agriculture (CSA) (hereafter INCLUDE) intervention compared with a wait-list control group (hereafter CONTROL) on diabetes prevention among Chinese immigrants with T2D in NYC. Participants will be randomized with equal allocation to one of the two groups. The INCLUDE group will receive one culturally tailored DPP brief video/week for 24 weeks delivered via WeChat. They will also have access to the CSA program that Co-I Dr. Stella Yi has built in existing and ongoing community-partnered work in Brooklyn Chinatown. The CONTROL group will continue to receive their usual care and, at the end of the study, they will receive DPP videos. Measurements will occur at baseline, 3, and 6 months. This study will provide critical information on whether it is efficacious to use an existing social media platform plus CSA support to enhance access to DPP. If the intervention is proven efficacious, this project can provide important data for future scaling of this intervention. This study may serve as a transformative new model to enhance access to culturally tailored diabetes education and promote health equity for underserved limited English proficiency (LEP) immigrant and minority groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chinese immigrants are the second largest immigrant group in the U.S., who suffer disproportionately high type 2 diabetes (T2D) burden and have poor diabetes outcomes. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is an evidence-based intervention to prevent or delay T2D. However, many social determinants of health (SDOH) barriers limit the access of DPP to underserved Chinese immigrants, including high rates of LEP, poverty, lack of health insurance, and poor access to care. Furthermore, there is a significant shortage of cultural- and linguistic-concordant providers to deliver DPP. Given the high T2D burden and rapid growth in the Chinese immigrant population, there is an urgent need for research to make DPP accessible to this minority group. High social media use (e.g., WeChat) in Chinese immigrants suggests a promising mechanism for enhancing access to DPP. Yet, this mobile health (mHealth) intervention alone is likely insufficient to address many SDOH barriers reported by LEP Chinese immigrants, including food insecurity, and lack of access to fruits and vegetables. Community-supported agriculture (CSA) has been demonstrated to be an effective way to improve food security in White populations, and may help to address food access issues in LEP Chinese immigrants. Guided by the NIMHD Research Framework, the investigators argue that a mHealth DPP intervention (individual level) that is supplemented with a culturally appropriate CSA (community level) with complementary nutrition/produce preparation education is a novel model for enhancing access to DPP and addressing SDOH barriers in LEP Chinese immigrants. The investigators' pilot work demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of WeChat-delivered educational videos targeting T2D management, and Co-I Dr. Stella Yi's pilot study has found high feasibility of the CSA model in LEP Chinese immigrants. Building upon these pilot data, the investigators will adapt their current T2D management intervention to include video content relevant to DPP and combine it with a CSA model. The goal of this study is to examine the efficacy of the video-based DPP+CSA (hereafter INCLUDE) intervention compared with a wait-list control group (hereafter CONTROL) on diabetes prevention among Chinese immigrants with T2D in NYC. Participants will be randomized with equal allocation to one of the two groups. The INCLUDE group will receive one culturally tailored DPP brief video/week for 24 weeks delivered via WeChat. They will also have access to the CSA program that Co-I Dr. Stella Yi has built in existing and ongoing community-partnered work in Brooklyn Chinatown. The CONTROL group will continue to receive their usual care and, at the end of the study, they will receive DPP videos. Measurements will occur at baseline, 3, and 6 months. This study will provide critical information on whether it is efficacious to use an existing social media platform plus CSA support to enhance access to DPP. If the intervention is proven efficacious, this project can provide important data for future scaling of this intervention. This study may serve as a transformative new model to enhance access to culturally tailored diabetes education and promote health equity for underserved LEP immigrant and minority groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must:

  1. self-identify as a Chinese immigrant or Chinese American;
  2. be between 18-70 years old,
  3. have a medical diagnosis of prediabetes or have a prediabetes risk test score of greater or equal to 5;
  4. Body Mass Index (BMI) >= 23 kg/m2,
  5. be willing to receive brief videos regarding diabetes prevention, and 6) possess a smartphone or, if they do not have one, be willing and able to use a study smartphone.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals will be excluded from participation if they meet any of the following:

  1. unable or unwilling to provide informed consent;
  2. unable to participate meaningfully in the intervention (e.g., uncorrected sight and hearing impairment);
  3. unwilling to accept randomization assignment;
  4. are pregnant, plan to become pregnant in the next 6 months, or become pregnant during the study, or
  5. are breastfeeding (e.g., they may have potential dietary restrictions).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: INCLUDE
Participants will receive one Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) video per week for 24 weeks. Additionally, community health workers (CHWs) will help participants to join the community-supported agriculture (CSA) program and assess and address other social determinants of health (SDOH) barriers.
Video-based intervention to prevent or delay Type 2 Diabetes. Includes both educational and social cognitive theory (SCT)-based behavioral content. Each video lasts about 5 minutes in duration.
Provides weekly and culturally appropriate fresh produce and in-language education on nutrition, healthy cooking demonstrations, and culturally tailored recipes for participants. Enables participants to socialize with other Chinese immigrants in the program as a way to enhance social cohesion and support.
No Intervention: CONTROL
Participants will receive the standard of usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
Weight measured in pounds (lbs) via Bluetooth-enabled smart-scale.
Baseline, Month 3
Percentage Change in Body Weight
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6
Weight measured in pounds (lbs) via Bluetooth-enabled smart-scale.
Month 3, Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire (WEL) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
20-item participant self-report of confidence level in resisting desire to eat. Assessed via 10-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not confident) to 9 (very confident). Scores range from 0-180; higher scores indicate higher confidence level in resisting desire to eat. An increase in scores indicates confidence levels in resisting desire to eat increased during the observation period.
Baseline, Month 3
Change in Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire (WEL) Score
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6
20-item participant self-report of confidence level in resisting desire to eat. Assessed via 10-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not confident) to 9 (very confident). Scores range from 0-180; higher scores indicate higher confidence level in resisting desire to eat. An increase in scores indicates confidence levels in resisting desire to eat increased during the observation period.
Month 3, Month 6
Change in Starting the Conversation (STC) Diet Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
8-item self-report questionnaire measuring dietary behaviors. Scores range from 0 to 16; lower scores indicate more healthful dietary behaviors. A decrease in scores indicates healthful dietary behaviors increased during the observation period.
Baseline, Month 3
Change in Starting the Conversation (STC) Diet Scale Score
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6
8-item self-report questionnaire measuring dietary behaviors. Scores range from 0 to 16; lower scores indicate more healthful dietary behaviors. A decrease in scores indicates healthful dietary behaviors increased during the observation period.
Month 3, Month 6
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short-Version Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3

7-item self-assessment providing an estimate of the number of minutes per week participants engage in three categories of physical activity: vigorous activity, moderate activity, and walking activity.

Scores are expressed in metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week. MET minutes represent the amount of energy expended carrying out physical activity. Higher scores indicate higher weekly levels of physical activity. An increase in scores indicates weekly levels of physical activity increased during the observation period.

Baseline, Month 3
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short-Version Score
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6

7-item self-assessment providing an estimate of the number of minutes per week participants engage in three categories of physical activity: vigorous activity, moderate activity, and walking activity.

Scores are expressed in metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week. MET minutes represent the amount of energy expended carrying out physical activity. Higher scores indicate higher weekly levels of physical activity. An increase in scores indicates weekly levels of physical activity increased during the observation period.

Month 3, Month 6
Change in San Francisco Chinese Food Security Module Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3

18-item self-assessment measuring food access and insecurity among Chinese immigrants. Responses of "yes," "often," "sometimes," "almost every month," and "some months but not every month" are coded as affirmative. Food Security Status Levels are assigned based on the total number of affirmative responses.

Households with children: 0-2 affirmative responses = "Food Secure"; 3-7 = "Food Insecure without Hunger"; 8-12 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Moderate"; 13-18 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Severe."

Households without children: 0-2 affirmative responses = "Food Secure"; 3-5 = "Food Insecure without Hunger"; 6-8 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Moderate"; 9-10 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Severe."

A decrease in the number of affirmative responses indicates food security status improved during the observation period.

Baseline, Month 3
Change in San Francisco Chinese Food Security Module Score
Time Frame: Month 3, Month 6

18-item self-assessment measuring food access and insecurity among Chinese immigrants. Responses of "yes," "often," "sometimes," "almost every month," and "some months but not every month" are coded as affirmative. Food Security Status Levels are assigned based on the total number of affirmative responses.

Households with children: 0-2 affirmative responses = "Food Secure"; 3-7 = "Food Insecure without Hunger"; 8-12 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Moderate"; 13-18 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Severe."

Households without children: 0-2 affirmative responses = "Food Secure"; 3-5 = "Food Insecure without Hunger"; 6-8 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Moderate"; 9-10 = "Food Insecure with Hunger, Severe."

A decrease in the number of affirmative responses indicates food security status improved during the observation period.

Month 3, Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lu Hu, PhD, NYU Langone Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research provided the investigator who proposes to use the data executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. Requests may be directed to: Lu Hu (lu.hu@nyulangone.org). The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposed to use the data will have access to the data upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to lu.hu@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PreDiabetes

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)

Subscribe