Impact of Optical Genome Mapping in Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (COALA)

July 29, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Contribution of Optical Genome Mapping to the Prognostic Classification of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of DNA Optical Mapping in the Management of Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (COALA)

A retrospective study using a new technology will be performed: the Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) on acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) samples stored at the CRB-Cancer of the Bordeaux University Hospital and annotated in the DATAML clinical database. The main objective is to estimate the proportion of AML patients for whom OGM detects at least one additional abnormality compared to conventional techniques. This study will constitute an important step in the validation of COA as a reference technique for cytogenetic analysis in AML, replacing the classical techniques, and could also constitute a first argument for redesigning the prognostic classification of AML.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In AML prognostic classifications, such as the ELN 2017 classification, which are used to guide treatment choices in the majority of protocols, rely heavily on genetic abnormalities. The Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) is a new technology that combines in one and the same technique the results of karyotype, FISH and SNP-Array, the latter being very little used in current practice in AML. OGM with greater sensitivity and a better resolution than the usual techniques should therefore allow us to identify more abnormalities than conventional cytogenetics; we would then like to determine whether these additional abnormalities have a prognostic impact, i.e., whether they lead to reclassification of patients initially classified as "favorable" or "intermediate" into the "unfavorable" prognostic category, with therapeutic consequences.

A retrospective study using the OGM is will be performed on samples stored at the CRB-Cancer of the Bordeaux University Hospital and annotated in the DATAML clinical database. In an original way, the focus will be on AML patients in whom 1 to 3 chromosomal abnormalities (non-recurrent WHO, not related to an unfavourable prognosis) have already been demonstrated by classical techniques, making the hypothesis that it is in this population that we would more easily have patients who could fall into the definition of the complex karyotype and thus into the unfavourable risk category.

OGM should therefore reveal a greater number of abnormalities which would allow a better definition of karyotypes with abnormalities, the number of complex and/or monosomal karyotypes and a better stratification of the prognosis of these patients with AML. This is an applied translational research study based on innovative technology that will define the place of OGM over current techniques used in the initial management of AML patients, and it may well become the new standard for cytogenetic analysis of AML in the coming years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU de Bordeaux, Service Hématologie Biologique

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with diagnosis of AML (with a minimum follow-up of 24 months)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years of age who have been treated with intensive chemotherapy
  • Diagnosis of AML (with a minimum follow-up of 24 months)
  • Presence of samples included in CRB-K in the AML collection
  • Cytogenetic data available: karyotype with 1-3 abnormalities present in one or more clones, excluding recurrent WHO abnormalities (t(8;21), inv(16) or t(16;16), t(9;11), t(v;11)(v;q23. 3), t(6;9), inv(3) or t(3;3) and t(9;22)) or assigned by itself to an unfavorable prognosis: -5 or del(5q); -7; -17/abn(17p).
  • Molecular data available for the following genes: ASXL1, CEBPA, FLT3-ITD, NPM1, RUNX1 and TP53 (the list of genes of interest may be adapted according to the upcoming ELN 2022 classification)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Samples not included in the CRB-K (lack of consent, insufficient material...)
  • Karyotype with one of the following abnormalities: (t(8;21), inv(16) or t(16;16), t(9;11), t(v;11)(v;q23.3), t(6;9), inv(3) or t(3;3), and t(9;22)) or associated with an unfavorable prognosis on its own: -5 or del(5q); -7; -17/abn(17p)
  • Karyotype without clonal abnormality

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with more abnormalities detected by OGM than by conventional cytogenetics
Time Frame: At baseline
At baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Average number of additional abnormalities detected by OGM compared to conventional techniques
Time Frame: At baseline
At baseline
Proportion of patients reclassified as complex and/or monosomal karyotype according to current ELN definitions
Time Frame: At baseline
At baseline
Proportion of patients for whom a change in therapeutic management could have been proposed
Time Frame: From baseline to Month 36
From baseline to Month 36
Comparison of overall survival and event-free survival curves of patients reclassified to the unfavorable group to those of the intermediate and unfavorable groups in a historical cohort
Time Frame: From baseline to Month 36
From baseline to Month 36
Interobserver reproducibility for interpretation of OGM results (Fleiss Kappa coefficient)
Time Frame: At baseline
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

Subscribe