Combined and Separate Effects of Cannabis and Tobacco: Psychomotor, Subjective and Physiological Outcomes (CASE-CT)

March 16, 2026 updated by: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Co-administration of cannabis and tobacco is a common practice, but there is little experimental evidence aimed at understanding the reasons for this prevalence. Some preliminary evidence suggests that tobacco may actually counteract the cognitive-impairing effects of cannabis, and may also increase the subjective ('liking') effects of cannabis, but results are inconclusive. Further, there are no studies into the effects of tobacco on other cannabis-related harms such as driving, or on the ability of tobacco to alter the blood levels of THC, the chemical responsible for the psychoactive properties of cannabis. The purpose of the present study will be to evaluate the effects of tobacco, cannabis or combinations of tobacco and cannabis on driving, cognition, subjective effects and blood THC. Driving will be assessed using a state-of-the-art driving simulator that allows for the safe and objective measurement of the effects of intoxicating substances on driving. Participants will be regular users of cannabis and will be invited to the lab for four counterbalanced test sessions. In these test sessions they will drive the simulator and undergo cognitive tests before and after smoking: 1) cannabis; 2) tobacco; 3) cannabis + tobacco; or 4) placebo. Outcomes will be measured at several time points after smoking the product. Participants will also give blood for determination of levels of THC, and will complete subjective effects questionnaires both before and after smoking the cigarette. This study will be one of the first experimental laboratory studies of the reasons behind co-administration of tobacco and cannabis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8
        • Recruiting
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Adults aged 19 years to 45 years (to control for the effects of age on cognition)

    • Smoke or vape cannabis at least once a month but no more than 4 times a week (to avoid enrolling people with cannabis use disorder who may experience withdrawal when asked to abstain from cannabis)
    • Experience with smoked cannabis in the past year
    • Report use of at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime to ensure familiarity with the tobacco used in the present study
    • Use of any nicotine (smoked, vaped, etc) in the past year
    • G2 or full G driver's licence for at least a year
    • Willing to abstain from alcohol and other drugs (other than drugs required for treatment of a medical condition) for 48 hours prior to study session
    • Normal heart rate and blood pressure as determined by the QI (because cannabis and tobacco increase heart rate)
    • Normal ECG (because cannabis and tobacco increase heart rate)
    • Willing to abstain from cannabis for 72 hours prior to the test session and from smoking tobacco for 12 hours
    • Willing to use an accepted form of contraception during the study (both males and females)
    • Past lifetime experience with co-use of cannabis or tobacco (either simultaneous or concurrent)
    • Provides written and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Use of psychoactive medications or drugs

    • Current alcohol or other substance use disorder, including cannabis (as assessed with the SCID)
    • Current or past nicotine dependence (to avoid precipitating a relapse)
    • Withdrawal symptoms as assessed with the Marijuana Withdrawal Checklist [57, 58]
    • A score of less than 10 on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA-Ar) [59]
    • Family history of schizophrenia or psychosis (to avoid giving cannabis to anyone with a predisposition to psychosis)
    • Respiratory illnesses (due to the smoked route of administration in this study)
    • Any serious medical condition precluding participation as judged by the responsible study physician
    • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
    • Negative urine screen for cannabis at eligibility assessment (to ensure experience with cannabis)
    • Neurological disorders that may affect cognitive function
    • Treatment-seeking for tobacco or cannabis use
    • Use of more than 5 cigarettes a day (to avoid confound of the effects of chronic smoking on measures)
    • Concomitant therapy with sedative-hypnotics or other psychoactive drugs (counter-indicated with cannabis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Placebo
A cigarette containing placebo cannabis and placebo tobacco
Dried flower cigarette with both placebo tobacco and cannabis
Other: Tobacco
A cigarette with placebo cannabis and active tobacco
Dried flower cigarette with active nicotine
Other: Cannabis
A cigarette with active cannabis and placebo tobacco
Dried flower cannabis cigarette with 22% THC
Other: Tobacco and cannabis
A cigarette with active cannabis and active tobacco
Dried flower cigarette with active nicotine and cannabis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standard deviation of lateral position
Time Frame: baseline
car 'weaving'
baseline
Standard deviation of lateral position
Time Frame: 15 minutes post smoking
car 'weaving'
15 minutes post smoking
Standard deviation of lateral position
Time Frame: 180 minutes post smoking
car 'weaving'
180 minutes post smoking

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speed
Time Frame: baseline
Speed (in km) of the car
baseline
Speed
Time Frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Speed (in km) of the car
15 minutes post smoking
Speed
Time Frame: 180 minutes post smoking
Speed (in km) of the car
180 minutes post smoking
Reaction time
Time Frame: baseline
Time to hit the brake after introduction of an obstacle
baseline
Reaction time
Time Frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Time to hit the brake after introduction of an obstacle
15 minutes post smoking
Reaction time
Time Frame: 180 minutes post smoking
Time to hit the brake after introduction of an obstacle
180 minutes post smoking
Collisions
Time Frame: baseline
number of times the car hit an obstacle
baseline
Collisions
Time Frame: 15 minutes post smoking
number of times the car hit an obstacle
15 minutes post smoking
Collisions
Time Frame: 180 minutes post smoking
number of times the car hit an obstacle
180 minutes post smoking
Concentration of THC (ng/ml)
Time Frame: Baseline
Psychoactive component of cannabis
Baseline
Concentration of THC (ng/ml)
Time Frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Psychoactive component of cannabis
15 minutes post smoking
Useful Field of View Processing Speed
Time Frame: baseline
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision
baseline
Useful Field of View Processing Speed
Time Frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision
60 minutes post smoking
Useful Field of View Processing Speed
Time Frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision
210 minutes post smoking
Useful Field of View Divided attention
Time Frame: baseline
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision, with a concurrent perpheral target task
baseline
Useful Field of View Divided attention
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision, with a concurrent perpheral target task
60 minutes
Useful Field of View Divided attention
Time Frame: 210 minutes
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision, with a concurrent perpheral target task
210 minutes
Useful Field of View Selective attention
Time Frame: baseline
Mean threshold for divided attention but with distractors
baseline
Useful Field of View Selective attention
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Mean threshold for divided attention but with distractors
60 minutes
Useful Field of View Selective attention
Time Frame: 210 minutes
Mean threshold for divided attention but with distractors
210 minutes
Trail making task
Time Frame: baseline
Cognitive assessment
baseline
Trail making task
Time Frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Cognitive assessment
60 minutes post smoking
Trail making task
Time Frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Cognitive assessment
210 minutes post smoking
Verbal free recall
Time Frame: baseline
Test of memory
baseline
Verbal free recall
Time Frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Test of memory
60 minutes post smoking
Verbal free recall
Time Frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Test of memory
210 minutes post smoking
Addiction Research Centre Inventory
Time Frame: baseline
Test of mood with 53 true-false questions that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores reflecting greater mood
baseline
Addiction Research Centre Inventory
Time Frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Test of mood with 53 true-false questions that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores reflecting greater mood
60 minutes post smoking
Addiction Research Centre Inventory
Time Frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Test of mood with 53 true-false questions that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores reflecting greater mood
210 minutes post smoking
Profile of Mood States
Time Frame: baseline
Test of mood with 76 items with a five point scale that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores indicating more agreemen
baseline
Profile of Mood States
Time Frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Test of mood with 76 items with a five point scale that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores indicating more agreemen
60 minutes post smoking
Profile of Mood States
Time Frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Test of mood with 76 items with a five point scale that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores indicating more agreemen
210 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: baseline
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
baseline
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 15 minutes post smoking
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
15 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes post smoking
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
60 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 120 minutes post smoking
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
120 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 180 minutes post smoking
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
180 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 240 minutes post smoking
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
240 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 300 minutes post smoking
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
300 minutes post smoking

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Driving Under the Influence

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe