- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04450966
Adolescent Substance Use Prevention Intervention Research Study in Pediatric Primary Care (ASPIRE)
Computer-facilitated Screening and Brief Intervention (cSBI) in Pediatric Primary Care to Reduce Underage Drinking: a Large, Multi-site Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Alcohol use disorders frequently have a pediatric origin. Pediatric primary care offices, where the majority of adolescents receive health care, are a promising venue for early identification and intervention through universal screening and brief counseling. However, while the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends primary care-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for adults, it found insufficient evidence to recommend it for adolescents.
The goal of the proposed study is to address this evidence gap by testing the effectiveness of a promising computer-facilitated Screening and Brief Intervention (cSBI) system for delivery by pediatric primary care clinicians to adolescents at well-visits. This cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) national primary care practice-based research network. PROS has demonstrated success in >30 years of practice-based research, with >600 practices participating in recent studies. Drawing on more than 15 years of our prior research on adolescent alcohol screening and brief counseling in primary care offices, the cSBI system was developed to provide a time-efficient and feasible way for pediatric practices to improve both the frequency and quality of alcohol screening and counseling. cSBI includes: 1) computer self-administered screening that adolescents complete prior to seeing their clinician, 2) 10 interactive psychoeducational pages for the adolescent on substance use health risks, 3) a Clinician Report Form with screen results and prompts that clinicians use to provide motivational interviewing-based individualized counseling, and 4) clinician training materials and protocol.
In a New England-based pilot study, we found that, compared to usual care (UC), the cSBI approach: 1) increased patient receipt of alcohol-related counseling during well-visits; 2) improved patients' ratings of the quality of their clinician encounter; and 3) among those who reported past-year use at baseline (n=192), was associated with a 34% lower risk of a heavy episodic drinking episode during 12 months follow-up. cSBI also reduced risk of riding with an impaired driver, a major safety risk associated with alcohol, by 42% among those with prior riding risk.
A larger RCT of this approach, which employs an adequately-powered sample and tests generalizability of effects beyond New England, is needed. We will randomize >30 pediatric primary care clinicians in ~10 practices nationwide to deliver UC or cSBI (1:1) to their eligible and assenting 14- to 17-year-old patients arriving for well-visits. Our aims are to test cSBI's effect on adolescent patients' heavy episodic drinking, and on riding with an impaired driver/driving while impaired, during 12 months follow-up. We hypothesize that, compared to adolescent patients receiving usual care, those receiving cSBI will have lower rates of reporting heavy episodic drinking and riding with an impaired driver/driving while impaired during the study follow-up period.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Lydia A Shrier, MD, MPH
- Phone Number: 617-355-5133
- Email: lydia.shrier@childrens.harvard.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sion K Harris, PhD
- Phone Number: 857-218-4304
- Email: sion.harris@childrens.harvard.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Itasca, Illinois, United States, 60143
- Recruiting
- American Academy of Pediatrics
-
Contact:
- Alessandra Torres, MPH
- Email: atorres@aap.org
-
Contact:
- Donna L Harris, MA
- Email: dlharris@aap.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Alessandra Torres, MPH
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Recruiting
- Boston Children's Hospital
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sion K Harris, PhD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Lydia A. Shrier, MD
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Recruiting
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
-
Contact:
- Alexander Fiks, MD, MSCE
- Email: fiksa@email.chop.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Alex Fiks, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 14-17
- Presenting for well-visit with participating clinician
- Reports any lifetime alcohol use
- If no lifetime alcohol use, reports riding with a driver under the influence in the past 12 months
- Has own cell phone and is willing to share cell phone number before their scheduled visit
- Completes required pre-visit activity/activities before well visit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Youth in foster care
- Unable to read and communicate in English
- Unable to complete follow-ups
- Currently receiving treatment from specialty clinician(s) for a substance use concern
- Deemed by their clinician to be inappropriate for study participation due to neurodevelopmental delays or medical/emotional concerns
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Clinicians randomized to this arm will not receive training in delivery of cSBI until study completion, and their participating patients will receive usual care.
|
|
Experimental: Computer-facilitated screening and brief intervention
Clinicians randomized to this arm will receive training in delivery of cSBI and their participating patients will then receive the experimental intervention.
|
cSBI includes: 1) computer self-administered screening that adolescents complete prior to seeing their clinician, immediately followed by 2) computer-delivered brief psychoeducation on the health risks of substance use to prime patients for the clinician encounter, and 3) a Clinician Report Form with screen results and prompts that clinicians use to provide motivational interviewing-based individualized counseling during the visit.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Any heavy episodic drinking day during past 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
|
Defined using the NIAAA Youth Guide age/gender-specific number of drinks.
|
3 months follow-up
|
Any heavy episodic drinking day during past 3 months
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Defined using the NIAAA Youth Guide age/gender-specific number of drinks.
|
6 months follow-up
|
Any heavy episodic drinking day during past 3 months
Time Frame: 9 months follow-up
|
Defined using the NIAAA Youth Guide age/gender-specific number of drinks.
|
9 months follow-up
|
Any heavy episodic drinking day during past 3 months
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Defined using the NIAAA Youth Guide age/gender-specific number of drinks.
|
12 months follow-up
|
Time to first day of heavy episodic drinking during 12 month follow-up period
Time Frame: 1-12 months follow-up
|
Defined using the NIAAA Youth Guide age/gender- specific number of drinks.
|
1-12 months follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Any riding/driving risk
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
|
Any riding with a driver who had been using alcohol or driving after using alcohol in past 3 months
|
3 months follow-up
|
Any riding/driving risk
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Any riding with a driver who had been using alcohol or driving after using alcohol in past 3 months
|
6 months follow-up
|
Any riding/driving risk
Time Frame: 9 months follow-up
|
Any riding with a driver who had been using alcohol or driving after using alcohol in past 3 months
|
9 months follow-up
|
Any riding/driving risk
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Any riding with a driver who had been using alcohol or driving after using alcohol in past 3 months
|
12 months follow-up
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Past 3 months alcohol use days
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
|
Number of days of any alcohol use in past 3 months
|
3 months follow-up
|
Past 3 months alcohol use days
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Number of days of any alcohol use in past 3 months
|
6 months follow-up
|
Past 3 months alcohol use days
Time Frame: 9 months follow-up
|
Number of days of any alcohol use in past 3 months
|
9 months follow-up
|
Past 3 months alcohol use days
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Number of days of any alcohol use in past 3 months
|
12 months follow-up
|
Past 3 months heavy episodic drinking days
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
|
Number of days of heavy episodic drinking in past 3 months
|
3 months follow-up
|
Past 3 months heavy episodic drinking days
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Number of days of heavy episodic drinking in past 3 months
|
6 months follow-up
|
Past 3 months heavy episodic drinking days
Time Frame: 9 months follow-up
|
Number of days of heavy episodic drinking in past 3 months
|
9 months follow-up
|
Past 3 months heavy episodic drinking days
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Number of days of heavy episodic drinking in past 3 months
|
12 months follow-up
|
Perceived risk of harm
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
|
Percent report perceiving moderate/great risk of harm from regular heavy episodic drinking
|
3 months follow-up
|
Perceived risk of harm
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Percent report perceiving moderate/great risk of harm from regular heavy episodic drinking
|
6 months follow-up
|
Perceived risk of harm
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Percent report perceiving moderate/great risk of harm from regular heavy episodic drinking
|
12 months follow-up
|
Drinking refusal self-efficacy
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
|
Score on Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy measure
|
3 months follow-up
|
Drinking refusal self-efficacy
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Score on Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy measure
|
6 months follow-up
|
Drinking refusal self-efficacy
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Score on Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy measure
|
12 months follow-up
|
Alcohol-related problems or negative consequences experienced since post-visit survey
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
|
Score on scale
|
6 months follow-up
|
Alcohol-related problems or negative consequences experienced since post-visit survey
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
|
Score on scale
|
12 months follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lydia A Shrier, MD, MPH, Boston Children's Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Sion K Harris, PhD, Boston Children's Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- NIAAA_1R01AA027253-01A1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heavy Drinking
-
RANDUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRecruiting
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedHeavy Drinking
-
University of HoustonCompletedHeavy DrinkingUnited States
-
University of HoustonCompleted
-
Wayne State UniversityCompleted
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthCompleted
-
Central Institute of Mental Health, MannheimCompletedHeavy DrinkingGermany
-
University of MemphisCompletedHeavy DrinkingUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)RecruitingBinge Drinking | Heavy Drinking | Young Adult | Heavy DrinkerUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
Clinical Trials on Computer-facilitated Screening and Brief Intervention
-
Boston Children's HospitalNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedPrevention Harmful EffectsUnited States
-
Treatment Research InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
Treatment Research InstituteWithdrawnSubstance AbuseUnited States
-
Boston Children's HospitalPearl NetworkWithdrawnDrug Abuse | Alcohol Abuse | Tobacco AbuseUnited States
-
Wayne State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance-Related DisordersUnited States
-
Wayne State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance-Related DisordersUnited States
-
Wayne State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
Jennifer Bogner, PhD, ABPPU.S. Department of EducationCompletedTraumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
University of PittsburghMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC; RTI International; Rite Aid Corp.; Pharmacy Quality AllianceCompletedMedication AdherenceUnited States
-
Wayne State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed