Community-based Brain Health Program to Address Dementia Risk (C-BBHP)

July 24, 2026 updated by: Posit Science Corporation
This is a validation study to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Brain Health Program, a multimodal curriculum covering dementia risk factors and evidence-based change interventions. The goal of this study is to evaluate the Brain Health Program in individuals with identified risk factors for the onset of dementia and to prepare for a large-scale efficacy trial in this population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will employ an evidence-based Brain Health Program curriculum, which involves a twelve-week, group-administered, personalized program designed to improve brain health in individuals with identified risk factors for the onset of dementia. This is a single-arm open-label feasibility study, enrolling older adults with Alzheimer's disease risk factors in a public health, community-deployed, group-based and individualized multimodal Brain Health Program (targeting, among other domains, diet, exercise and cognitive exercise), with a set of baseline assessments intended to characterize the population, and outcome measure to evaluate the usability of the program, as well as preliminary efficacy to reduce dementia risk factors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94105
        • YMCA of San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who are 65 years of age or older.
  2. Participants who meet criteria for one or more ADRD dementia risk factors

    1. Family history of Alzheimer's dementia (1st degree relative)
    2. Genetic marker (APOE4++)
    3. Subjective or objective cognitive decline (neuropsychological testing; or self-reported "yes" to the following question: "In the past two years, have you experienced a decline in your memory or thinking?"
    4. Poorly controlled hypertension or diabetes
    5. Physical inactivity <150min/week per Surgeon General guidelines
    6. Social isolation, in which participant rarely or never gets social and emotional support when needed
  3. Participants who are fluent English or Spanish speakers, per self-report, to ensure reasonable neuropsychological results on key assessments.
  4. Participants have access to an internet accessible device (eg. laptop, desktop computer, tablet or smartphone)
  5. Participants are able to attend all 12 classes (once a week for 12 weeks) and make up missed classes, as needed
  6. Participants are able to travel to/from YMCA location, if they choose to be a part of the in-person group

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent
  2. Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument - Short (CASI-Short) scores ≤ 25 (suggestive of cognitive impairment)
  3. Participants with untreated psychiatric conditions, including substance abuse/dependence disorders.
  4. Participants enrolled in a concurrent clinical trial involving an investigational pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, medical device, or behavioral treatment that could affect the outcome of this study. However, participation in standard treatments (e.g., occupational therapy) or use of prescribed medications (e.g., anti-depressants) is allowable.
  5. Participants presently attending classes or courses like this program that is focused on dementia risk and behavior management.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Brain Health Program
A multimodal educational and interactive diet, exercise and computerized cognitive exercise public health program.
The Brain Health Program employs 1-hour/week group-based training and education regarding modifiable Alzheimer's disease dementia risk factors delivered over a 12-week period. Participants will be assigned into a group of up to 20 participants, and participants will engage the Brain Health Program collaboratively, as administered by the program content leader (instructor), while also being monitored and supported by the tech leader (in accordance with the Diabetes Prevention Program model).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Net Promoter Score
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
NPS (Net Promoter Score) is a whole number on a scale of -100 to +100, calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters. Promoters (score 9-10) are likely to exhibit value-creating behaviors, such as referring other potential program participants. Detractors (score 0-6) are less likely to do so. Passives (score 7-8) fall in between. Passives count toward the total number of respondents, which decreases the percentage of Promoters and Detractors and pushes the score toward 0. Higher score is better.
At 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Complete at 80% of Intended Program Sessions.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
At 12 weeks
Program Comprehension
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program was easy to comprehend. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
At 12 weeks
Relevancy of Program
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program was relevant. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
At 12 weeks
Program Awareness
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program effectively raised awareness about brain health and how to manage it. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
At 12 weeks
Program Work Assignments
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the work assigned in the program was reasonable. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
At 12 weeks
Positive Lifestyle Change Post-program
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program helped to make a positive lifestyle change. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
At 12 weeks
Program Satisfaction
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program was satisfying. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
At 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Van Vleet, PhD, Posit Science Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PSC-0318-22
  • 1R43AG074756 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe