Local Anesthesia With Computerized Device for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients

September 21, 2022 updated by: Andrea Scribante, University of Pavia

Local Anesthesia With SleeperOne® Device vs Traditional Syringe for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the present study is to assess if there are differences on perceived pain during local anesthesia performed with SleeperOne device or with a traditional syringe in pediatric patients.

Patients responding to the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate to the study. After signing the informed consent, they will undergo local anesthesia procedure on first or second primary molars for the subsequent performing of dental filling. The split-mouth design will randomly allocate first or second primary molar from one quadrant to SleeperOne procedure, while the contralateral one will be subdued to local anesthesia with traditional syringe.

After the procedure, patients will be asked to assess the perceived pain with a Visual Analogue Scale from a range 0-10. VAS scales will be used to assess sensations of "size" (related to the two instruments), bitter and vomit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the present study is to assess if there are differences on perceived pain during local anesthesia performed with SleeperOne device or with a traditional syringe in pediatric patients.

Patients responding to the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate to the study. After signing the informed consent, they will undergo local anesthesia procedure on first or second primary molars for the subsequent performing of dental filling. Teeth will be randomly allocated to the two different local anesthesia types according to a split-mouth design: first or second primary molar from one quadrant will undergo SleeperOne anesthesia, while the contralateral one will undergo local anesthesia with traditional syringe.

After the procedure, patients will be asked to assess the perceived pain with a Visual Analogue Scale from a range 0-10. VAS scales will be used to assess sensations of size (related to the two instruments), bitter and vomit.

Sample size calculation (alfa = 0.05; power = 95%) for two independent study group and a continuous primary endpoint is performed concerning the primary outcome "VAS scale for pain". An expected mean of 2.6 with an expected mean difference of 1.7 and a standard deviation of 1.84 are hypothesized [Palm et al., 2004]; therefore, 30 teeth per group are required and a total of 30 patients for the split-mouth design study should be enrolled.

Statistical analysis will be performed. Data normality of distribution will be assessed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Subsequently, the most appropriate test will be conducted to compare VAS differences between the two groups for the four variables "pain", "size", "bitter", "vomit".

Linear regressions will be performed to assess of the following independent variables on "pain", "size", "bitter" and vomit": technique, quadrant, dental arch, tooth, dentition, sex, age.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lombardy
      • Pavia, Lombardy, Italy, 27100
        • Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatrics - University of Pavia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of dental caries requiring filling with local anesthesia on first or second primary molar
  • presence of dental caries requiring filling with local anesthesia on the contralateral primary molar

Exclusion Criteria:

  • gingivitis
  • dental abscesses, facial traumas/injuries
  • drugs (NSAIDS, paracetamol, antibiotics)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SleeperOne
SleeperOne S4 (Revello S.p.A., Verona, Italy) appliance will be used for the administration of local anesthetic.
Local anesthetic injection of articaine 4% + adrenaline 1/100.000 (Septanest, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) with 30G - 9 mm needle (DENTAL HI TEC, ZI de l'Appentière, Mazières-en-Mauges, France).
Active Comparator: Traditional anesthesia
Local anesthesia will be performed with a traditional syringe (0480-1, ASA Dental, Massarosa, LU, Italy).
Local anesthetic injection of articaine 4% + adrenaline 1/100.000 (Septanest, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) with 30G - 9 mm needle (DENTAL HI TEC, ZI de l'Appentière, Mazières-en-Mauges, France).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain measure
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-reported pain by the patient immediately after local anesthesia infiltration using a VAS (visual analogue scale), containing a combination of Numeric Rating Scale (0-10, where 0 means no pain, 10 - worst possible pain) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, including pictures of facial expressions with correlating numbers of 0-10 (0 being 'no hurt' and 10 being 'hurts worst'). The combination allows children to pick a facial expression, that corresponds with their pain and see a number that matches it.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Size sensation
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-reported sensation of size related to the instruments by the patient after local anesthesia infiltration using a VAS (visual analogue scale), containing a combination of Numeric Rating Scale (0-10, where 0 means no size, 10 - very bulky) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, including pictures of facial expressions with correlating numbers of 0-10 (0 being 'no problem with it' and 10 being 'very bulky'). The combination allows children to pick a facial expression, that corresponds with their sensation and see a number that matches it.
Baseline
Bitter sensation
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-reported sensation of bitter by the patient after local anesthesia infiltration using a VAS (visual analogue scale), containing a combination of Numeric Rating Scale (0-10, where 0 means no bitter, 10 - very bitter) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, including pictures of facial expressions with correlating numbers of 0-10 (0 being 'no bitter' and 10 being 'very bitter'). The combination allows children to pick a facial expression, that corresponds with their sensation and see a number that matches it.
Baseline
Vomit sensation
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-reported sensation of vomit by the patient after local anesthesia infiltration using a VAS (visual analogue scale), containing a combination of Numeric Rating Scale (0-10, where 0 means no vomit, 10 - very vomiting at all) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, including pictures of facial expressions with correlating numbers of 0-10 (0 being 'no vomit' and 10 being 'very vomiting'). The combination allows children to pick a facial expression, that corresponds with their sensation and see a number that matches it.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available upon motivated request to the Principal Investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries in Children

Clinical Trials on local anaesthetic injection

Subscribe