Influence of Adding High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound to Traditional Therapy on Axioappendicular Muscles Amplitude and Fatigue in Mechanical Neck Pain Randomized Clinical Trials (MNP)

January 23, 2023 updated by: Al Shaymaa Shaaban Abd El Azeim, Cairo University
The purpose of this study will investigate the effect of adding high power pain threshold ultrasound to traditional therapy on axioappendicular muscles amplitude and fatigue in neck pain

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Myofascial pain syndrome is a common musculoskeletal pain disorder affecting almost 95% of people with chronic pain disorders and is a common finding in especially pain management centres.It is characterized by trigger points, defined as hyperirritable spots within taut bands of skeletal muscle fibers. The syndrome is associated with tenderness in the muscle, referred pain, spasm and restriction of motion. Patients with MPS begin with one active MTrP (called the primary MTrP) in the affected muscles due to chronic repetitive minor muscle strain, poor posture, systemic diseases, or neuro-musculoskeletal lesions. When not treated correctly, expansion of the pain region and additional active MTrPs (called secondary or satellite MTrPs) will develop one of the most appropriate treatments for trigger points ultrasound therapy. The high-power pain threshold ultrasound (HPPTUS) technique is one of the ultrasound modifications used to treat trigger points In 2004, Majlesi et al. performed the first clinical study to compare this technique with the traditional ultrasound technique in patients with myofascial trigger points. The results showed that HPPTUS was much more effective than the traditional technique, and pain reduction and improved range of motion (ROM) were significant in a smaller number of sessions.sixty patients with mechanical neck pain will be assigned randomly to two equal group. one group will receive high power pain threshold ultrasound and traditional therapy and the other receive traditional therapy alone for four weeks.

.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt, 12511
        • Al Shaymaa Shaaban Abd El Azeim

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with mechanical neck pain from both genders.
  • age between 19 and 38 years
  • patients will be required to have active TrPs in the upper trapezius and levator muscle and neck pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they have History of whiplash injury,
  • History of cervical spine surgery,
  • Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy,
  • Having undergone physical therapy within the past 3 months before the study
  • Non- rheumatologic diseases as multiple sclerosis,
  • thyroid dysfunction and chronic infection and Rheumatologic condition as mild systemic lupus erythematosus, poly-articular osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and advanced cervical spine degenerative diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: high power pain threshold ultrasound
the patients will receive high power pain threshold ultrasound and traditional therapy twice a week for four weeks
After explaining the procedure, and the trigger points will be marked by a physical therapist that . Then, the hand placed next to the prone position with the head in the neutral position, and the hands placed next to the body. The frequency was set to 1 MHz, and the intensity increased from 0.5 to 2 until the patient reported an unpleasant sensation. The probe will be held there for 4 s; then, the intensity was reduced by 50%, and the probe was moved over and around the trigger point. This process is done several times for three minutes.
the patients will receive traditional therapy in the form of postural correction exercise, active range of motion and stretching exercise for cervical muscles
Active Comparator: traditional therapy
the patients will receive traditional therapy twice a week for four weeks
the patients will receive traditional therapy in the form of postural correction exercise, active range of motion and stretching exercise for cervical muscles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity
Time Frame: up to four weeks
pain will be measured by visual analogue scale
up to four weeks
pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: up to four weeks
commander algometer device will be used to measure pressure pain threshold
up to four weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
neck disability
Time Frame: up to four weeks
neck disability index will be used to measure neck disability.
up to four weeks
muscle amplitude and fatigue
Time Frame: up to four weeks
electromyography will be used to measure muscle amplitude and fatigue
up to four weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • p.t.REC/012/003619

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on high power pain threshold ultrasound

Subscribe