- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05542316
Validation of the PMR Activity Score and Evolution of Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica
Validation of the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity Score for Determination of Disease Activity
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a systemic inflammatory disease that affects elderly people. It is characterized by pain and morning stiffness in the shoulders, pelvic girdles and neck. Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of the treatment. In clinical practice, the disease activity of PMR and corresponding treatment changes are based on the presence of symptoms and inflammatory markers. The interpretation of these abnormalities can be surprisingly difficult, especially when they are not consistent. In 2004, Leeb and Bird developed a composite score for measurement of disease activity in PMR, called the polymyalgia rheumatica activity score. It consists of 5 domains: morning stiffness time, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global assessment, pain and CRP level. However, high-quality evidence on the measurement properties is lacking and there is still no consensus on the optimal cut off point.
Based on a Delphi study with physicians and patients OMERACT defines laboratory markers of systemic inflammation, pain, stiffness and physical function as the four inner core of domains considered mandatory for clinical trials of PMR, most frequently measured by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and/or C-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, morning stiffness time and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) respectively. Patient's global fatigue was strongly recommended to measure in PMR as well. Recently, a PMR-specific patient-reported outcome measure was developed, called the PMR impact scale. However, outcome measures in PMR studies lack consistency and there is no high-quality evidence on the measurement properties. In addition, the evolution of these patient reported outcomes is not known.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The primary objective of this prospective observational trial is to validate the PMR-activity score and to determine the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease. The secondary objective is to assess the evolution of the patient reported outcomes during the disease course and their relation with disease activity.
The investigators intend to perform a 12-month, observational prospective trial in patients with recently diagnosed PMR. Patients will be followed and treated as standard of care. Follow-up visits will be planned at 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks. As in standard of care, additional visits can be planned if necessary, e.g. in case of symptoms suggestive of relapse. Each visit ESR, CRP, morning stiffness time, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global assessment and VAS for pain as components of the PMR-activity score and VAS for global health, pain, stiffness and fatigue, HAQ-DI, Short Form Health survey (SF36) and PMR impact scale as patient-reported outcomes will be collected.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium
- University Hospitals Leuven
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of PMR based on the judgment of an experienced clinician (affiliated with the general internal medicine or rheumatology department), taking into account all available information (clinical symptoms, biochemical, radiological, and PET results)
- Able to give informed consent
- Understanding and able to write Dutch, English or French
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (new diagnosis or being treated for giant cell arteritis)
- Concurrent rheumatoid arthritis, other inflammatory arthritis or other connective tissue disease
- Patients on glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive drugs for another indication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Patients with a final diagnosis of PMR
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the PMR-activity score and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of morning stiffness time and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of ability to elevate the upper limbs and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of physician's global assessment using a visual analogue scale and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of patient's assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in the PMR-activity score between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in morning stiffness between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in ability to elevate the upper limbs between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in physician's global assessment using a visual analogue scale between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in patient's assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in C-reactive protein between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of the ability to elevate the upper limbs over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of the patient's assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of the patient's assessment of global health using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of the patient's assessment of fatigue using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of the patient's assessment of stiffness using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of morning stiffness time over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF36) over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
|
Evolution of the PMR impact scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
|
52 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steven Vanderschueren, MD, PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Leeb BF, Bird HA. A disease activity score for polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Oct;63(10):1279-83. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.011379.
- Mackie SL, Twohig H, Neill LM, Harrison E, Shea B, Black RJ, Kermani TA, Merkel PA, Mallen CD, Buttgereit F, Mukhtyar C, Simon LS, Hill CL; OMERACT PMR Working Group. The OMERACT Core Domain Set for Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. J Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;44(10):1515-1521. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.161109. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
- Twohig H, Owen C, Muller S, Mallen CD, Mitchell C, Hider S, Hill C, Shea B, Mackie SL. Outcomes Measured in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Measurement Properties of Instruments Considered for the OMERACT Core Outcome Set: A Systematic Review. J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):883-893. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200248. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
- Twohig H, Mitchell C, Mallen CD, Muller S. Development and psychometric evaluation of the PMR-Impact Scale: a new patient reported outcome measure for polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Feb 1;62(2):758-765. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac317.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
- Skin Diseases
- Skin Diseases, Vascular
- Vasculitis
- Vasculitis, Central Nervous System
- Arteritis
- Polymyalgia Rheumatica
- Giant Cell Arteritis
Other Study ID Numbers
- S66638
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Polymyalgia Rheumatica
-
University Hospital, BrestEli Lilly and CompanyRecruitingPolymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)France
-
SanofiRegeneron PharmaceuticalsRecruitingPolymyalgia RheumaticaUnited States
-
Kresten Krarup KellerOdense University Hospital; Gødstrup Hospital; Svendborg Hospital; Regionshospitalet... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPolymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)Denmark
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkGenentech, Inc.Completed
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandNovartis; Schweizerische Stiftung für die Erforschung der MuskelkrankheitenRecruitingPolymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) | Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)Switzerland
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruitingPolymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) | Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)France
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsActive, not recruitingPolymyalgia RheumaticaUnited States, Germany, Denmark, France, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom, Belgium, Hungary, South Africa, Argentina, Australia, Poland, Colombia, Japan, Mexico, Czechia, Switzerland, Brazil, Canada, Netherlands, Chile
-
Sint MaartenskliniekZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Dutch...CompletedPolymyalgia RheumaticaNetherlands
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedPolymyalgia RheumaticaUnited States, Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, Israel, Denmark, France, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom, Hungary, South Africa, Argentina, Australia, Lebanon, Poland, Sweden, Colombia, Ireland, Japan, Iceland, Mexico, Czechia, ... and more
-
Sint MaartenskliniekZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Dutch...Active, not recruitingPolymyalgia RheumaticaNetherlands