Validation of the PMR Activity Score and Evolution of Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica

March 25, 2025 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Validation of the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity Score for Determination of Disease Activity

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a systemic inflammatory disease that affects elderly people. It is characterized by pain and morning stiffness in the shoulders, pelvic girdles and neck. Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of the treatment. In clinical practice, the disease activity of PMR and corresponding treatment changes are based on the presence of symptoms and inflammatory markers. The interpretation of these abnormalities can be surprisingly difficult, especially when they are not consistent. In 2004, Leeb and Bird developed a composite score for measurement of disease activity in PMR, called the polymyalgia rheumatica activity score. It consists of 5 domains: morning stiffness time, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global assessment, pain and CRP level. However, high-quality evidence on the measurement properties is lacking and there is still no consensus on the optimal cut off point.

Based on a Delphi study with physicians and patients OMERACT defines laboratory markers of systemic inflammation, pain, stiffness and physical function as the four inner core of domains considered mandatory for clinical trials of PMR, most frequently measured by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and/or C-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, morning stiffness time and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) respectively. Patient's global fatigue was strongly recommended to measure in PMR as well. Recently, a PMR-specific patient-reported outcome measure was developed, called the PMR impact scale. However, outcome measures in PMR studies lack consistency and there is no high-quality evidence on the measurement properties. In addition, the evolution of these patient reported outcomes is not known.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this prospective observational trial is to validate the PMR-activity score and to determine the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease. The secondary objective is to assess the evolution of the patient reported outcomes during the disease course and their relation with disease activity.

The investigators intend to perform a 12-month, observational prospective trial in patients with recently diagnosed PMR. Patients will be followed and treated as standard of care. Follow-up visits will be planned at 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks. As in standard of care, additional visits can be planned if necessary, e.g. in case of symptoms suggestive of relapse. Each visit ESR, CRP, morning stiffness time, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global assessment and VAS for pain as components of the PMR-activity score and VAS for global health, pain, stiffness and fatigue, HAQ-DI, Short Form Health survey (SF36) and PMR impact scale as patient-reported outcomes will be collected.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

133

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium
        • University Hospitals Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Diagnosis of PMR

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of PMR based on the judgment of an experienced clinician (affiliated with the general internal medicine or rheumatology department), taking into account all available information (clinical symptoms, biochemical, radiological, and PET results)
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Understanding and able to write Dutch, English or French

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (new diagnosis or being treated for giant cell arteritis)
  • Concurrent rheumatoid arthritis, other inflammatory arthritis or other connective tissue disease
  • Patients on glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive drugs for another indication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with a final diagnosis of PMR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the PMR-activity score and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of morning stiffness time and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of ability to elevate the upper limbs and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of physician's global assessment using a visual analogue scale and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of patient's assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in the PMR-activity score between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in morning stiffness between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in ability to elevate the upper limbs between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in physician's global assessment using a visual analogue scale between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in patient's assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the change in C-reactive protein between two visits and the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of the ability to elevate the upper limbs over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of the patient's assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of the patient's assessment of global health using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of the patient's assessment of fatigue using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of the patient's assessment of stiffness using a visual analogue scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of morning stiffness time over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF36) over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Evolution of the PMR impact scale over the disease course and the relation with disease activity
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven Vanderschueren, MD, PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Subscribe