Time Lapse Assisted Embryo Selection Versus Non Invasive PGT-A Assisted Embryo Selection

September 26, 2022 updated by: Papanikolaou Evaggelos, Assisting Nature

IVF Outcomes Based on Time Lapse Assisted Embryo Selection Versus Non Invasive PGT-A Assisted Embryo Selection

This is a prospective randomised study of the evaluation of the clinical IVF results after time lapse assisted embryo selection versus Non-invasive PGT-A assisted embryo selection in subfertile women.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A randomized prospective study focusing on subfertile women undergoing IVF treatment followed by embryo transfer on the blastocyst stage.

Women assigned to group A proceed to embryo transfer, after time lapse assisted embryo selection, while women of group B after non-invasive PGT-A assisted embryo selection.

IVF outcomes, regarding the success rate of the trasnfer and the time required to achieve conception is studied in both groups.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 39 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Women aged 18- 39, faced with infertility issues, meeting the above inclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women who followed IVF treatment
  • 39 years old or younger
  • Single embryo transfer
  • blastocyst stage cultured embryos

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women over the age of 39 years
  • not blastocyst transfer (transfers performed at earlier embryo stage)
  • double embryotransfer
  • women who had invasive PGT-a test
  • women whose embryos were not time-lapse monitored

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TIME LAPSE
Women who proceed to embryo transfer after time lapse assisted embryo selection.
The basis of embryo seletion for transfer: morphological or genetic after non-invasive PGT-A
NI-PGT-A
Women who proceed to embryo transfer after non-invasive PGT-A assisted embryo selection.
The basis of embryo seletion for transfer: morphological or genetic after non-invasive PGT-A

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Embryotransfers to conceive
Time Frame: Up to the embryotransfer of the last enrolled patient (Dec 2023)
The number of the embryotransfers required for women to conceive
Up to the embryotransfer of the last enrolled patient (Dec 2023)
Cumulative Live Birth Rate
Time Frame: Up to 38 weeks after the embryo transfer
Cumulative Live Birth Rate achieved after one OPU treatment
Up to 38 weeks after the embryo transfer
Time interval to conceive
Time Frame: Up to the pregnancy test after the last embryo transfer of an enrolled patient (Jan 2024)
Time interval required for women to conceive (in months): from OPU day to positive hCG test
Up to the pregnancy test after the last embryo transfer of an enrolled patient (Jan 2024)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abortion rate
Time Frame: Up to 2nd trimester miscarriages
The spontaneous miscarriage of women in both groups
Up to 2nd trimester miscarriages
DaC rate
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks of pregnancy according to Greek Law
The rate of the dilation and curretage rate in both groups
Up to 24 weeks of pregnancy according to Greek Law

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evangelos Papanikolaou, MD,PhD, Assisting Nature

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on embryo selection

3
Subscribe