Nutrition Screening - Route to a More Practical Method

September 14, 2022 updated by: Alastair Forbes, University of Tartu

Observational study. Comparison of existing nutritional screening tools based on questionnaires with blood tests already performed on a routine basis.

No intervention undertaken.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nutrition screening is of established benefit but is difficult to ensure in ordinary clinical practice. It is relatively labour intensive. The investigation aims to determine whether routinely collected laboratory data could provide comparable information without the need for personnel time. It is known that individual blood tests do not provide sufficient sensitivity or specificity but it is hypothesised that combinations of tests could do so.

Included subjects are those admitted to the University Hospital department of internal medicine. All are eligible other than those subject to protective isolation for infection control (COVID, etc). Data collection is in the form of questionnaires to permit the calculation of 3 tools widely used for screening for malnutrition and malnutrition risk, namely the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Nutritional status is documented by the patient's status according to the international definition provided by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM).

The blood tests already performed on a routine basis are captured to go alongside the nutrition screening tools.

Analysis will aim to determine whether combinations of laboratory data can simulate or replicate the information provided by MUST and NRS2002.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tartumaa
      • Tartu, Tartumaa, Estonia, 50406
        • Tartu Ulikooli Kliinikum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In-patient in department of internal medicine

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

In-patient in department of internal medicine

Exclusion Criteria:

Unable to complete questionnaire or in protective isolation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of new nutrition risk screening tool (devised from 200 patients) by validation in 100 contemporaneous patients in comparison with established screening tools (MUST, NRS-2002 and SGA) and malnutrition defined by GLIM.
Time Frame: Within 6 months of completion of recruitment

Established tools for screening and assessing nutritional status are utilised. These are the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002), the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). Data from laboratory testing that has already been performed on these patients is extracted from their hospital records. It is hypothesised that multivariate analysis of indicative parameters will identify 6 to 12 tests that can be combined (with appropriate weighting) into a new predictive score.

300 sets of patient data will be divided on a randomised basis into a group of 200 from whom the prospective new scoring system will be devised, and a group of 100 in whom the score will be tested for validity against NRS-2002.

Within 6 months of completion of recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation of new score against GLIM
Time Frame: Within 6 months of completion of recruitment
The intended new score will be tested against GLIM. The primary validation is against NRS-2002 as the score is intended as a screening tool for high risk of malnutrition, but it is important to determine whether it is also a test of established malnutrition.
Within 6 months of completion of recruitment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PKL-127

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Internal Medicine

Clinical Trials on Standard nutrition screening tools to be compared with routine blood tests

Subscribe