Efficacy of the antiCD38 Monoclonal Antibody Isatuximab in the Treatment of PCRA by Major ABO Mismatch After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (ErythroSIM)

September 26, 2022 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Randomized Prospective Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of the antiCD38 Monoclonal Antibody Isatuximab in the Treatment of PCRA by Major ABO Mismatch After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A quarter of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are performed in a situation of major ABO mismatch exposing patients to the risk of immunological pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) after transplant. PCRA after transplant is defined as anemia with low reticulocytes count (under 10 G/L) after day 60 despite good leucocytes and platelet engraftment, full donor chimerism, associated with the persistence of recipients hemagglutinins (anti-A or anti-B antibodies). Bone marrow evaluation when performed show erythroid hypoplasia. Red blood cells transfusions are necessary every two weeks until remission leading to impaired quality of life (anemia, repeated hospitalization), iron overload, and need for iron chelation therapy. Treatments currently used are inefficient (anti CD20 monoclonal antibodies, EPO, steroids, plasma exchanges, proteasome inhibitors) or at risk of severe acute GVHD (donor lymphocytes infusion). PRCA has been demonstrated to be associated with the persistence of recipient's plasma cells.

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies which targets plasma cells secreting hemagglutinins responsible of PCRA are a promising treatment: 6 cases reported in the literature support a rapid and sustain efficacy but a prospective randomized evaluation of its efficacy and safety in this context is necessary.

The main objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of the treatment of PRCA by isatuximab after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant compared to supportive care only control group (reduction in PRCA resolution time in days)

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 15 years or older
  • Having receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in condition of major ABO mismatch
  • PCRA defined by persistent red blood cell transfusion dependence at day 60 post-transplant with reticulocytes count under 10 G/L despite full donor chimerism and a good leucocytes (>1 G/L) and platelet (>50G/L) recovery
  • No relapse or progression of underlying disease
  • Contraception methods must be prescribed during all the duration of the research and using effective contraceptive methods during treatment for women of childbearing age (continue abstinence from heterosexual intercourse is accepted) and for man during the study treatment period and for at least 5 months after the last dose of study treatment and refrain from donating sperm during this period
  • With health insurance coverage
  • Having signed a written informed consent (2 parents for patients aged less than 18)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged < 15 years
  • Relapse of underlying disease
  • Leucocyte chimerism < 95%
  • PRCA related to Parvovirus B19 infection (positive blood PCR)
  • Known to be HIV+ or to have hepatitis A, B, or C active infection
  • Active tuberculosis
  • Pregnancy (βHCG positive) or breast-feeding.
  • Patient receiving recombinant human erythropoietin.
  • Patient receiving proteasome inhibitor (Bortezomib for example).
  • Patient receiving thrombopoietin receptor agonists (ARTPO).
  • Patient receiving plasma or plasmapheresis exchanges after transplant.
  • Planned to receive any investigational drug within 14 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer.
  • Any clinically significant, uncontrolled medical conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, would expose excessive risk to the patient or may interfere with compliance or interpretation of the study results.
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or history of intolerance to steroids, mannitol, pregelatinized starch, sodium stearyl fumarate, histidine (as base and hydrochloride salt), arginine, hydrochloride, poloxamer 188, sucrose or any of the other components of study therapy that are not amenable to premedication with steroids and H2 blockers or would prohibit further treatment with these agents.
  • Who have any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness
  • Under tutorship or curatorship
  • Who not understand informed consent for an optimal treatment and follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Isatuximab arm
Isatuximab treatment at a dose of 10 mg/kg by intravenous route. The first injection of isatuximab will be performed at randomization (month 6 +/- 2 days). A second injection may be performed at day 15 if the reticulocytes <10 G / L, and a third at day 29 if reticulocytes <10 G / L. Patients will be assessed on day 1, day 15, day 29, day 45, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after randomization.
Isatuximab treatment at a dose of 10 mg/kg by intravenous route. The first injection of isatuximab will be performed at randomization (month 6 +/- 2 days). A second injection may be performed at day 15 if the reticulocytes <10 G / L, and a third at day 29 if reticulocytes <10 G / L. Patients will be assessed on day 1, day 15, day 29, day 45, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after randomization.
No Intervention: comparator arm
No treatment, supportive care will be allowed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
time interval between randomization (corresponding to the M6 post-transplant) and resolution of PRCA (date of resolution of reticulocytopenia) treated or not by the anti-CD 38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab
Time Frame: 9 months post randomization
9 months post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of red blood cell transfusions after randomization
Time Frame: from randomization through study completion, an average of 9 months after randomization
from randomization through study completion, an average of 9 months after randomization
Ferritin levels
Time Frame: at month 6 post-transplant
at month 6 post-transplant
Ferritin levels
Time Frame: at month 9 post-transplant
at month 9 post-transplant
Ferritin levels
Time Frame: at month 15 post-transplant
at month 15 post-transplant
Adverse events (CTC-AE grade ≥ 2)
Time Frame: up to 13 months post transplant
up to 13 months post transplant
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3)
Time Frame: at day 60
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at day 60
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3)
Time Frame: at day 100
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at day 100
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3)
Time Frame: at 6 months
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at 6 months
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3)
Time Frame: at 9 months
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at 9 months
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3)
Time Frame: at 12 months
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at 12 months
Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3)
Time Frame: at 15 months post-transplant
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at 15 months post-transplant
Spontaneous resolution of PRCA between day 60 and 6 months post-transplant
Time Frame: at 6 months post-transplant
at 6 months post-transplant
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at day 60 post transplant
at day 60 post transplant
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at day 100 post transplant
at day 100 post transplant
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at day 15 post randomization
at day 15 post randomization
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at day 29 post randomization
at day 29 post randomization
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at day 45 post randomization
at day 45 post randomization
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at month 3 post randomization
at month 3 post randomization
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at month 6 post-randomization
at month 6 post-randomization
Antibody level (anti A and/or anti B titers)
Time Frame: at month 9 post-randomization
at month 9 post-randomization
Number of days of hospitalization
Time Frame: up to 9 months post ranomization
up to 9 months post ranomization
Number of days of transfusions support
Time Frame: up to 9 months post randomization
up to 9 months post randomization
Number of days of chelation treatments
Time Frame: up to 9 months post randomization
up to 9 months post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP200067

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Immunological Pure Red Cell Aplasia

Clinical Trials on Isatuximab

Subscribe