Acute Hip Fracture and Spinal Anaesthesia Injection Time

February 25, 2026 updated by: Bengt Nellgård, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Hemodynamic Effects During Fast vs Slow Injection Time of Spinal Anaesthesia in Elderly Patients With Acute Hip Fracture .

The systemic effects of spinal anesthesia is not fully known. Our aim of this study is to assess whether there is a difference in hemodynamic effects if the spinal dose is given fast (15s) or slow (90s) in elderly patients with acute hip fracture (AHF). Ninety (n=90) patients with AHF planned for surgery within 72h at our hospital will be enrolled in the study and randomly devided into two groups. The patients will receive one predetermined dose of spinal anesthesia followed by an advanced minimally-invasive hemodynamic monitoring through an arterial line using FloTrac-system. The hemodynamic parameters will be conducted 10 minutes prior to the spinal anaesthesia and 30 minutes after the spinal block is given. Hypotension was defined as a fall in MAP > 30 % or a MAP <65mmHg.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Both general and spinal anesthesia is known for inducing hypotension, which may be a problem for the elderly patients, often with many co-morbidities, causing a risk of organ hypoperfusion. At our clinic the investigators have a great experience with the neuraxial technique when operating these patients. Based on clinical experience the investigators hypothesise that a slow injection rate of the spinal dos would reduce the incidence and degree of hypotension. The investigators also aim to study the changes in the hemodynamic response between the groups in more detail as mentioned below.

Patients planned for acute hip fracture surgery in spinal anaesthesia at our hospital and fulfills the inclusion criteria will be included in our study. The investigators plan to include 90 patients, randomized in two groups where Group A will be given a spinal anaesthesia in 15s and Group B in 90s.

After arriving to the preoperative area, the patients will be given 5 L oxygen on a face mask and a standard monitoring with ECG, pulse- oximetry will be started, followed by the placement of a venous cannula and a radial arterial line. The patients will also be given a fascia iliaca compartment block (FIC) with ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml 35-40 ml for comfort. In addition, the FloTrac system will be set up, using the existing arterial line, for advanced hemodynamic monitoring including invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP), Cardiac Index (CI), Heart Rate (HR), Stroke Volume (SV) and System Vascular Resistance (SVR)/ (SVRI).

A lumbal spinal anesthesia will be performed using a 25G pencil point needle. The intrathecal dose of anesthesia consists of isobar bupivacaine 5mg/ml 2,4 ml and fentanyl 50ug/ml 0,4ml. Sensory level will be monitored by "cold spray" Hypotension will be defined as a fall in MAP by >30% or MAP < 65 mmHg. As an surrogate factor for the aggregated time of hypotension the total amount of given vasopressor will be calculated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • V. Götaland
      • Mölndal, V. Götaland, Sweden, 43130
        • Gothenburg University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

61 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. >65 years of age
  2. patient with hip fracture
  3. ASA >/=2
  4. scheduled for acute surgery in spinal anesthesia, 5. mentally intact to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. anticoagulantion medication
  2. planned for general anesthesia
  3. surgery delayed > 72h
  4. lack of informed consent.
  5. severe aortic stenosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 15 s injection time
Patients in group A will be given the spinal anesthesia with an injection time of 15 s
As proxy for hypotension we record amount of Norepinephrine given during the study time of 30 minutes
Active Comparator: 90 s injection time
Patients in group B will be given the spinal anesthesia with an injection time of 90 s
As proxy for hypotension we record amount of Norepinephrine given during the study time of 30 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
Time Frame: 10 minutes before and 45 minutes after the intrathecal dose is given
change in MAP after spinal anesthesia
10 minutes before and 45 minutes after the intrathecal dose is given

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac Output (CO)
Time Frame: 10 minutes before and 45 minutes after the intrathecal dose is given
CO change over time and relation to the speed of injection of the spinal anesthesia
10 minutes before and 45 minutes after the intrathecal dose is given
Systemic vascular resistance over time and relation to the speed of injection of the spinal anesthesia
Time Frame: 10 minutes before and 45 minutes after the intrathecal dose is given
10 minutes before and 45 minutes after the intrathecal dose is given

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bengt MD Nellgård, Prof, Sahlgrenska University Hospital /Mölndal, Sweden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe