Appreciation for Music Processed by Hearing Aids

March 27, 2023 updated by: AlexanderLab, Purdue University
Normal-hearing participants aged 18-25 with and without musical training will listen to a series of short musical samples that have been recorded through hearing aids. The music will be played at a comfortable listening level. Subjects will use the computer to rate the sound quality of the music on a 7-point Likert scale.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hearing aids are designed to treat hearing loss and restore quality of life by aiding spoken communication ability. To improve a user's listening experience for speech, hearing aids process background noise, reduce amplification for loud sounds, and use adaptive directionality for different environments, along with various other features. However, while much research and attention have been placed on developing features that improve a user's listening experience for speech, research and attention are lacking on developing features that improve a user's listening experience for music.

In addition to spoken communication, music is also influential in maintaining the quality of life. Greasley et al. (2020) report that hearing aid users, especially those who play music, often experience negative emotional consequences when they disengage from music for reasons associated with how their hearing aids amplify music. They also report that two-thirds of the hearing aid users they surveyed experienced at least some problems when listening to music. This is not a trivial issue, given that music is a significant source of entertainment - Delmonte (2018) reports that Americans aged 16 to 65+ years listen to music for more than 2 hours per day.

This study will evaluate which feature or combination of features currently being used in hearing aid music programs results in the best listening experience for music. Secondary objectives of this study will be to address the lack of information in the literature about judgments of the quality music stimuli of younger listeners, to include a wider variety of culturally inclusive music samples, and to include a comparison of preferences of musician and non-musician listeners. These objectives will be pursued by comparing the efficacy of different features used in current music programs to the default speech program and if the rankings for baseline and music features are higher or lower for musicians/non-musicians.

Participants who meet the inclusion criteria (see below) will undergo an informed consent procedure, which includes a verbal and written description of the procedures to be followed, an assurance that there are no known risks to participants, an indication of the option to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty, and the name and phone numbers of the Principal Investigator. All participants will sign the IRB-approved informed-consent form. Written consent will also be obtained for participants interested in being contacted for related studies in the future.

After informed consent, participants will complete a questionnaire about their musical experience. Participants will then have their hearing screened by an undergraduate laboratory assistant (the PI is a certified and licensed audiologist). These tests involve listening to a series of short beeps at different frequencies and intensities and pressing a button when a sound is detected. Participants who do not meet the inclusion criteria will be compensated for their time completing the questionnaire and audiologic evaluation.

During the experiments, listeners will sit in a sound-treated room and listen to brief (10-15 second) music samples presented over headphones. After each presentation, listeners will indicate their response using the computer mouse by selecting one option of a 7-point rating scale on the screen. These responses will constitute the data that will be subsequently analyzed. Sessions will last about 1 to 2 hours, including breaks taken at the participants' discretion. Data for a single experiment generally can be collected in one or two sessions, therefore, participants will be under no pressure to continue their participation over an extended period.

We will use a controlled laboratory design to investigate our questions, and participants will not have access to the sound processing outside of the laboratory. Therefore, whatever experimental manipulation we introduce immediately ceases once the participant removes the headphones.

No deception ever occurs in any of these experiments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47907
        • Recruiting
        • Purdue University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Normal hearing (audiometric thresholds <= 20 dB HL, except one that may be 25 dB HL)
  • Native English speakers

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hearing Aid Signal Processing
Each subject will listen to recordings of music processed by seven different hearing aid brands set to the default "Speech in Quiet" program and the default "Music" program. Recordings (hearing aid brand x program x music sample) will be randomized from trial to trial.
Each subject will listen to recordings of music processed by seven different hearing aid brands set to the default "Speech in Quiet" program and the default "Music" program. Recordings (hearing aid brand x program x music sample) will be randomized from trial to trial.
Other Names:
  • Hearing Aid Music Feature

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sound Quality: Music Feature Activated vs. Deactivated
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Within each hearing aid manufacturer, the mean sound quality with the music feature activated will be compared against the mean sound quality with the music feature deactivated.
60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sound Quality: Music Feature across Manufacturers
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Across hearing aid manufacturers, the mean sound quality with the music feature activated will be compared.
60 minutes
Effects of Music Training
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Mean quality ratings for subjects with more than 5 years of formal musical training will be compared against those with less than 5 years of formal musical training.
60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joshua Alexander, Purdue University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 15, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data stored as a CSV file will be shared along with the audio recordings used to obtain the data. Individual participants' responses (sound quality rating) to each trial (audio recording) will be provided.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon formal acceptance of published manuscript; to be stored indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Hearing Aid Program

Subscribe