Silodosin vs Tamsulosin as MET

October 3, 2022 updated by: Ellen Yu, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong

Randomised Controlled Trial on Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Treatment of Ureteral Stones Size 5-10mm in Chinese

The spontaneous passage rate for ureteral stone less than 1cm causing acute ureteral obstruction is about 50%. Previous Cochrane review has concluded that alpha blocker is likely to increase stone passage rate, reduce time to stone passage, analgesic use and hospitalisations. The European Association of Urology Guideline also recommends giving alpha blockers as Medical Expulsive Therapy to patients with distal ureteric stones >5mm. However there is heterogeneity in different alpha blockers.

Silodosin is a recently introduced selective alpha blocker which has a much higher selectivity for the alpha-1-A receptor (17-fold compared with tamsulosin). From previous animal studies, ureteral contraction is mainly mediated by the alpha-1-A receptor, hence silodosin maybe more effective in increasing stone passage compared with tamsulosin.

Previous studies and meta-analysis has shown superiority of silodosin over tamsulosin on earlier stone passage and less pain. However, there is no data on Chinese population.

The investigators would like to compare the efficacy and side effect profile of Silodosin versus tamsulosin on improving stone passage rate and hence reduce rate of further intervention for stone clearance.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Hong Kong
        • Contact:
          • YI CHIU, MBBS (HK)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Presented with radio-opaque ureteric stone of size 5mm to 10mm on KUB
  • Patients who can understand the study protocol and comply with the followup schedule

Exclusion criteria:

  • Radiolucent stone
  • Paper thin cortex
  • Non-functioning kidney
  • Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine greater than 1.8 mg/dl or 160umol/dL)
  • Concurrent urosepsis
  • Current [alpha]-blocker usage, Ca channel blocker, steroid
  • Pregnancy
  • Age < 18
  • History of ureteral stricture
  • History of ureteric stone treatment within 2 years
  • Allergic reaction to the study medication
  • Unable to Consent
  • Patient on JJ stent or PCN drainage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tamsulosin
0.4mg daily for 4 weeks
Cap tamsulosin
Experimental: Silodosin
8mg daily for 4 weeks
Cap silodosin for medical expulsion therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone free rate
Time Frame: FU at week 2
Wet KUB for stone passage & RFT before FU (check 3/7 before the last FU)
FU at week 2
Stone free rate
Time Frame: FU at week 4
Wet KUB for stone passage & RFT before FU (check 3/7 before the last FU)
FU at week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain control
Time Frame: FU at week 2
Use of analgesics and VAS pain scale (0-10)
FU at week 2
Pain control
Time Frame: FU at week 4
Use of analgesics and VAS pain scale (0-10)
FU at week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stone, Urinary

Clinical Trials on Tamsulosin

Subscribe