Intermittent vs Daily Tamsulosin for LUTS/BPH (ARAB)

December 19, 2025 updated by: Mahmoud Laymon, Mansoura University

Intermittent (Every-Other-Day) vs Daily Tamsulosin for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) : A Multicenter, Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial. Arab Randomized Assessment of BPH Treatment (ARAB Trial)

Background:

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common in aging men, most often due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and significantly impair quality of life. α1-adrenoceptor antagonists are first-line therapy, with tamsulosin being the most widely prescribed. However, ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) is a frequent adverse effect that negatively affects adherence. Optimal dosing strategies that maintain urinary efficacy while reducing EjD are not well defined, and current guidelines provide no recommendations regarding alternate-day dosing.

Patients and Methods:

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial will enroll men aged ≥50 years with LUTS/BPH and baseline IPSS ≥8. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily or every other day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint is change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline to Week 24. Non-inferiority will be concluded if the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference in mean IPSS change (EOD - Daily) is ≤ +3 points.

The key secondary endpoint is change in Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) total score from baseline to Week 24, tested for superiority only if IPSS non-inferiority is established. Additional secondary endpoints include maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), IPSS-Quality of Life score, and ejaculatory adverse-event rates.

Sample Size and Analysis:

Assuming an SD of 6 for IPSS change, a non-inferiority margin of +3, one-sided α of 0.025, and 90% power, approximately 85 evaluable patients per arm are required for the primary endpoint. To ensure adequate power for EjD outcomes and allow for 20% attrition, 144 participants per arm (288 total) will be randomized. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle with per-protocol sensitivity analyses. Primary inference will use ANCOVA or MMRM adjusted for baseline score, age, and study site, with multiple imputation for missing data.

Expected Outcomes:

This trial will provide the first adequately powered multicenter evidence on whether every-other-day tamsulosin preserves non-inferior LUTS control while improving ejaculatory outcomes, potentially supporting a simple and cost-effective strategy to enhance tolerability and adherence in men with LUTS/BPH.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are commonly treated with α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, with tamsulosin being among the most frequently prescribed agents. Although effective for symptom relief, tamsulosin is associated with ejaculatory dysfunction, which may negatively affect treatment satisfaction and adherence. Despite long-standing clinical use, optimal dosing strategies that preserve urinary efficacy while reducing ejaculatory adverse effects remain insufficiently studied. Existing investigations of dose reduction or alternate-day regimens have been limited by small sample size, short follow-up, single-center design, and non-standardized assessment of sexual outcomes. Consequently, international guidelines do not currently recommend every-other-day dosing.

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial is designed to evaluate whether every-other-day tamsulosin dosing maintains non-inferior improvement in urinary symptoms while offering superior ejaculatory outcomes compared with standard daily dosing. Following a 4-week open-label run-in period with daily tamsulosin, participants demonstrating a predefined clinical response without safety concerns will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue daily dosing or switch to every-other-day dosing for 24 weeks. Randomization will be centralized, computer-generated, and stratified by study site and baseline symptom severity.

After randomization, participants and treating clinicians will be aware of treatment allocation; however, outcome assessors and statisticians will remain blinded to minimize assessment and analytical bias. Study visits and assessments will be standardized across centers, and participants will be instructed not to disclose allocation status to assessors.

Efficacy assessments will include patient-reported symptom scores, objective voiding parameters, and validated sexual function questionnaires collected at prespecified intervals during follow-up. Safety monitoring will include adverse events, orthostatic vital signs, and treatment adherence throughout the study period.

The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of every-other-day dosing compared with daily dosing for improvement in urinary symptoms over 24 weeks, using a predefined non-inferiority margin based on established clinical relevance. A hierarchical testing strategy will be applied to evaluate superiority for ejaculatory function outcomes only if non-inferiority for urinary symptom control is established. Statistical analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle with supportive per-protocol analyses, using appropriate regression models adjusted for baseline values and study site.

This study aims to provide high-quality multicenter evidence to inform dosing strategies that optimize both efficacy and tolerability of tamsulosin in men with LUTS/BPH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

288

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Outside U.S./Canada
      • Al Mansurah, Outside U.S./Canada, Egypt, 35516

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Men ≥40 years with LUTS/BPH.

    • IPSS ≥8, Qmax 5-15 mL/s (voided volume ≥150 mL), PVR <200 mL.
    • Sexually active within the past month (for ejaculatory outcomes).
    • BPH-treatment naïve: no prior use of antimuscarinics or 5-α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) and agrees not to initiate these agents during the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • PVR ≥ 200 mL.

    • Prior prostate/ radical pelvic surgery (that affect pelvic innervation).
    • Neurogenic bladder (atonic/ hypotonic bladder).
    • Severe hepatic/renal insufficiency.
    • Significant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease.
    • Any indication of surgical treatment (vesical stones, chronic urine retention, recurrent attacks of acute urine retention, recurrent attacks of gross hematuria, hydronephrosis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Daily arm: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily.
Participants receive standard tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily for the study duration. This arm serves as the reference for evaluating efficacy and safety compared with the intermittent regimen.
Experimental: EOD arm: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg every other day (no capsule on off-days)
Participants receive tamsulosin 0.4 mg every other day (intermittent regimen) for the study duration. The regimen is designed to evaluate whether reduced-frequency dosing is non-inferior to standard daily therapy in improving LUTS/BPH symptoms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in International prostate symptom score (IPSS) From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24

Change in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline to Week 24. The IPSS is a validated 7-item questionnaire assessing lower urinary tract symptoms, with total scores ranging from 0 to 35, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

This is a non-inferiority comparison with a non-inferiority margin of +3 IPSS points. Non-inferiority will be concluded if the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference in mean IPSS change (Intermittent - Daily) is ≤ +3 points.

Baseline to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in MSHQ-Ejaculatory Dysfunction Total Score From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change in the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) total score from baseline to Week 24. The MSHQ-EjD is a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing ejaculatory function, with total scores ranging from 0 to 15, where higher scores indicate better ejaculatory function (less dysfunction).
Baseline to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared. Aggregate results will be reported through publications and ClinicalTrials.gov

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Daily Tamsulosin

Subscribe