Sex Hormone Overdose and Misuse in Chinese Transgender and Gender Non-conforming Population (HODMChina)

October 14, 2022 updated by: Ben-tuo Zeng, Xiamen University

Sex Hormone Overdose and Misuse in Chinese Transgender and Gender Non-conforming Population: a Mixed-methods Study

The investigators propose to investigate the definition of hormone overdose and misuse (HODM) in Chinese transgender and gender nonconforming population (TGNCs), address the incidence of HODM in Chinese TGNC population, related factors and risks, identify the probable causes of HODM, and follow up HODM individuals to explore long-term effects.

The research questions are:

Q1 What is the definition and the criteria of HODM in Chinese TGNC population? Q2 What is the prevalence of HODM in Chinese TGNC population? Q3 What factors and risks are relevant to HODM? Q4 What are the causes? Q5 What are the long-term effects of HODM in Chinese TGNC population, compared to those who enroll in regular GAHT regimens?

The investigators decide to employ a mixed-methods design to construct a full research framework on HODM. A prospective cohort study is a component of the study.

The study can be divided into four stages to address research questions. Stage I will establish a precise definition and eligibility criteria of HODM through expert panel meeting and stakeholder engagement. Subsequently, a cross-sectional study will be conducted to evaluate the rate, subtypes, and related factors of HODM in Chinese TGNCs. In Stage III, semi-structured interviews and focus groups for TGNCs who are identified as HODM will be employed to investigate the causes, motivations and personal impact factors. This stage will be divided into two phases, Stage III-a before the cross-sectional study to provide a brief picture of HODM behaviors, and Stage III-b after the cross-sectional study to draw an overall pattern. Lastly, all participants of Stage II or III who would like to participate in our follow-up will be included in prospective cohorts to assess long-term effects.

Among the stages, the cohort study is the subject of the registration. The investigators propose two cohorts in the study. Participants who are identified as HODM will be assigned to cohort 1 [HODM cohort], and those who are identified as regular GAHT use will be assigned to cohort 2 [non-HODM cohort]. Participants will be asked to report their gender-related and hormone use-related conditions, and mental health-related conditions at specific timepoints. The investigators will compare the HODM cohort to the non-HODM cohort to see if the overall incidence of adverse effects, gender-related, hormone-related, and mental health-related conditions differ in the cohorts.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

260

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Fujian
      • Xiamen, Fujian, China, 361102
        • School of Medicine, Xiamen University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ben-tuo Zeng, B.Sc.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yang Liu, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We will disseminate a questionnaire among online TGNC communities, social medias, under the help of TGNC-related non-government organizations (NGO). Each participant will be asked to share the link to other TGNCs. Only the completers of the questionnaire who agree to be followed up will be eligible for the cohort study. However, if needed, we will also recruit more TGNCs from outside previous participants via social media.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with Chinese nationality (excluding Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, and Taiwan).
  • Aged over 12.
  • Identify themselves as TGNCs of any subtypes, including transgender female, transgender male, genderqueer, gender non-binary, crossdresser, or other subtypes.
  • have experienced at least one month of GAHT of any regimens and frequency in the last one year, or is taking hormones during the period of the study.
  • Hormones taken include androgen, estrogen, progesterone, anti-androgen, and anti-estrogen of any chemical structures, trade names, or regimens.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who undertake GAHT in the absence of self-consciousness due to mental disorders, or under external coercion/abuse.
  • Refuse to sign or unable to understand the informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hormone Overdose and Misuse Group
Transgender and gender non-conforming individuals who have been identified as hormone overdose and misuse (HODM) at start of the cohorts according to the criteria established by the study.
This is an observational study. Hormone Overdose and Misuse is an exposure.
Non-Hormone Overdose and Misuse Group
Transgender and gender non-conforming individuals who have been identified as without hormone overdose or misuse (HODM) at start of the cohorts according to the criteria established by the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
24 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
60 months from the baseline assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
24 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
60 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
24 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
60 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
12 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
24 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
36 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
60 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
12 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
24 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
36 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
60 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
24 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
60 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
24 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
60 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
24 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
60 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
12 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
24 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
36 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 24 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
24 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
60 months from the baseline assessment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 1 month from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
1 month from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 3 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
3 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
6 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
12 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
18 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
30 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
36 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
42 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
48 months from the baseline assessment
Moderate-to-severe adverse events
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. CTCAE v5.0 grades adverse effects as from grade 1 (asymptomatic or mild) to grade 5 (death).
54 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
6 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
12 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
18 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
30 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
36 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
42 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
48 months from the baseline assessment
GAHT attrition
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Gender affirming hormone treatment attrition due to moderate-to-severe adverse events [any adverse events of Grade 2 or higher in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0].
54 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 3 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
3 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
6 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
12 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
18 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
30 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
36 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
42 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
48 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Gender dysphoria, evaluated using Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS). UGDS-GS scores range from 18 to 90, and higher scores indicate higher levels of gender dysphoria.
54 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 1 month from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
1 month from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 3 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
3 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
6 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
18 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
30 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
42 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
48 months from the baseline assessment
Depression
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Depression, evaluated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
54 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 1 month from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
1 month from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 3 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
3 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
6 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
18 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
30 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
42 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
48 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Anxiety, evaluated using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 27, and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
54 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
6 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
12 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
18 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
30 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
36 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
42 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
48 months from the baseline assessment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Quality of life, using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale. SF-36 scores range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better quality of life.
54 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
6 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
12 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
18 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
30 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
36 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
42 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
48 months from the baseline assessment
Body image
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Body image, using Body Image States Scale (BISS). BISS scores range from 6 to 54, and higher scores indicate worse body images.
54 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 3 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
3 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
6 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
12 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
18 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
30 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
36 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
42 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
48 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Body-gender congruence, evaluated using Transgender Congruence Scale (TCS). TCS scores range from 1 to 5 (or 12 to 60), and higher scores indicate better gender congruence.
54 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 3 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
3 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
6 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
18 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
30 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
42 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
48 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
54 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stage
Time Frame: 60 months from the baseline assessment
Tanner stages, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Tanner Stage figures. Tanner stages divide the puberty process into 5 stages (stage 1 to stage 5), and higher stages indicate higher levels of puberty.
60 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 3 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
3 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 6 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
6 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 12 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
12 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 18 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
18 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 30 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
30 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 36 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
36 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 42 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
42 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 48 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
48 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity
Time Frame: 54 months from the baseline assessment
Gender identity, evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from 0% female to 100% female. This score does not indicate any better or worse conditions.
54 months from the baseline assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ben-tuo Zeng, School of Medicine, Xiamen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gender Dysphoria

Clinical Trials on Hormone Overdose and Misuse

Subscribe