Gender Affirming Vaginoplasty With Tubularized Augmented Peritoneal Cap (TAPCap) Utilizing Fish Skin Xenograft (Kerecis™)

December 3, 2025 updated by: Shubham Gupta, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Bottom gender affirming surgery is one of the key steps towards aligning the physical appearance and gender identity in transgender women. This surgery not only helps in reducing gender dysphoria but also significantly improves the quality of life and psychological well-being of the patients. The basic steps of bottom surgery typically involve the creation of a vagina using the skin from genital organs like the testes and penis, construction of the clitoris and labia. This complex surgery aims to create a functional and aesthetically pleasing vaginal canal that allows for sexual activity, urinary function, and a natural appearance.

As part of routine care, a special graft (skin-like material) called Kerecis™ is used to line the middle part of the vagina. It is made from North Atlantic cod skin that is treated in the laboratory and made suitable for surgery purposes. It can be used instead of skin. This graft has been given permission by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for marketing the US.

This study aims to identify changes in healing parameters following Kerecis™ based vaginoplasty. Up to 20 participants for this study.

Participants will be asked to fill out study questionnaires during follow-up visits at post-op week 2, week 12, month , and year 1.

At the 6 month post-op follow up, punch biopsies will be obtained from the deepest part, middle part, and the vaginal part most near to the vaginal opening parts to check the healing process using a microscope. The punch biopsies will be 1/8th inch x 1/8th inch each.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals requiring graft-based vaginoplasty

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 19-99
  • Transgender women planning for gender affirming robotic vaginoplasty with TAPCap technique

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring Kerecis for Revision Vaginoplasty
  • Surgery candidates having Zero depth vaginoplaty (ZDV)
  • Non-Gender Affirming Vaginoplasty
  • Cases requiring the utilization of off-the-shelf grafts other than Kerecis
  • Allergy to fish products
  • Allergy to local anesthetic (1% lidocaine with epinephrine injection)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Individuals receiving vaginoplasty
Individuals requiring graft-based vaginoplasty
In this surgery, the distal portion of the neovagina is constructed using inverted penile skin, the proximal portion is made of peritoneal tissue. The area in between peritoneal tissue and penile skin is lined with the Kerecis graft in this standard of care surgery.
Biopsies will be obtained at 6 months post-op from the distal, middle, and proximal portions of the neovagina.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of Neovaginal Epithelialization
Time Frame: Six months post-op

Degree of epithelialization of each sample biopsy. Biopsies are obtained from the proximal segment (peritoneal portion), middle segment (Xenograft portion), and, distal segment (penile skin portion) of the neovagina.

Grade 0: No epithelialization Grade 1 : Minimal epithelialization Grade 2: Moderate epithelialization Grade 3: Significant epithelialization

Six months post-op
Change in Vaginal Diameter
Time Frame: Post-op week 2, week, 12, month 6, and year 1
The participants' vaginal diameter is calculated based on the largest tolerated vaginal dilator size (Soul Source; CA, USA) . Measurements are reported in centimeters (cm).
Post-op week 2, week, 12, month 6, and year 1
Change in Vaginal Depth
Time Frame: Post-op week 2, week, 12, month 6, and year 1
The participants' vaginal depth are calculated based on the largest tolerated vaginal dilator (Soul Source, CA, USA). Measurements are reported in centimeters (cm).
Post-op week 2, week, 12, month 6, and year 1
Change in quality of life as measured by the Short-Form 36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
This is a validated questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life through eight domains, covering physical and mental well-being. It's widely used in healthcare to assess overall health perception and functional status. With higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
Change in Pain as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame: Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
This is a concise validated questionnaire used to evaluate the severity and impact of pain experienced by individuals. It consists of questions that assess the intensity of pain at its worst, least, average, and current levels, as well as its interference with various aspects of daily life such as general activity, mood, walking ability, work, relationships, and enjoyment of life. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
Change in Pain as measured by the The Female Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI)
Time Frame: Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
This is a validated questionnaire used to assess symptoms related to genitourinary pain in women. It includes questions covering pain severity, urinary symptoms, and impact on quality of life, providing clinicians with a standardized tool to evaluate and monitor participants' symptoms and treatment responses in these chronic pain conditions. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
Change in overall perception of improvement as measured by the PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement)
Time Frame: Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
This is a patient-reported scale that measures how individuals perceive their overall improvement after treatment, offering clinicians insight into treatment effectiveness from the participant's viewpoint. Lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Week 2, Week 12, Month 6, and year 1 post-op
Change in sexual function of improvement as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Time Frame: Month 6, and year 1 post-op
This is a validated 19-item questionnaire assessing six domains of female sexual function: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Each domain is scored, and the total score reflects overall sexual function, with higher scores indicating better function. It is used in clinical and research settings to evaluate sexual health and the impact of treatments. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Month 6, and year 1 post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shubham Gupta, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gender Dysphoria, Adult

Clinical Trials on Tubularized augmented peritoneal cap vaginoplasty

Subscribe