- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05606289
Trial of Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Mental Health Training for Police Officers
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Mental Health Training for Police Officers
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the effect, or lack thereof, of the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training among police officers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Whether the 40-hour CIT training improves police officers' verbal crisis de-escalation skills / non-verbal physical behavior
- Whether police officers with and without CIT training use different procedural justice and make different disposition-related decisions
Participants will:
- Receive or not receive CIT training depending on whether they are randomized to the intervention group or the control group.
- Participate in three assessments: baseline before the randomization, 3-months post-randomization, and 6-month post-randomization.
Researchers will compare police officers who were randomized to the control group with police officers who were randomized to the intervention group to see if receiving the CIT training make differences on the outcome measurements.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI), as well as those experiencing suicidality or psychiatric crisis encounter police officers frequently in the community. Almost a third of people with SMI have police involved in their pathway to mental health care. Although a variety of strategies to reduce law enforcement involvement in mental health crisis response are emerging, people with SMI and/or those in crisis will continue to encounter police when officers must serve as first responders, and importantly, during officers' routine patrol duties. As such, officers need training to safely and effectively interact in these situations. The Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) model is a collaborative approach that includes a 40-hour training of officers. CIT has been implemented in thousands of U.S. communities, and some agencies are now mandating all of their officers complete CIT training. Despite widespread support and growing research, a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) has never been conducted to assess the effectiveness of CIT training on officers' actual skills and behaviors. Prior research has relied on officers' self-report of their de-escalation skills and has not directly measured actual performance in a rigorous, standardized, controlled fashion. Furthermore, multi-site studies are lacking, and potential officer-level factors that may moderate CIT training outcomes have yet to be systematically assessed.
This study will partner with six sites across the country representing diverse geographic areas and constituency demographics. There are four Specific Aims of the study. First, the investigators will conduct a rigorous, multisite randomized controlled trial (RCT) of CIT mental health training. Each agency will provide 40 officers, for a total of 240. Among the 40 officers from each agency, half will be randomized to CIT training. Data will be collected using Standardized Scenarios, which will be rated centrally in a blinded fashion (blinded by site, study arm, and time). The primary outcome is actual verbal crisis de-escalation skills / non-verbal physical behavior. Second, the investigators will determine the impact of CIT training on two secondary outcomes: use of procedural justice and disposition-related decision-making.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University in the CIty of New York
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- English-speaking
- Has not yet taken part in CIT training
- Willing and able to be tested, randomized to CIT training or no training, and re-tested at 3-months and 6-months
- Employment as a police officer from participating site
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CIT officers
Police officers randomized to the experimental group will receive a 40-hour CIT training curriculum.
|
Standard 40-hour CIT training given in one week.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Non-CIT officers
Police officers randomized to the no-intervention group will not receive the 40-hour CIT training curriculum.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior Rating (3 months)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior will be assessed via blinded video ratings.
The primary outcome is the total score.
Domains include: (1) use of reflective statements, (2) use of summarizing/paraphrasing, (3) labelling of emotions, (4) use of encouraging statements, (5) maintaining a conversational tone, (6) seeking clarification from the subject, (7) speaking in a calm and level voice, (8) displaying empathy, (9) displaying honesty, (10) use of simple instructions, (11) asking directly about suicidal ideation, (12) use of space: maintaining appropriate physical distance from the subject, (13) using cover and objects for safety as appropriate, (14) aspects of body language that promote collaboration.
Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior Rating (6 months)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior will be assessed via blinded video ratings.
The primary outcome is the total score.
Domains include: (1) use of reflective statements, (2) use of summarizing/paraphrasing, (3) labelling of emotions, (4) use of encouraging statements, (5) maintaining a conversational tone, (6) seeking clarification from the subject, (7) speaking in a calm and level voice, (8) displaying empathy, (9) displaying honesty, (10) use of simple instructions, (11) asking directly about suicidal ideation, (12) use of space: maintaining appropriate physical distance from the subject, (13) using cover and objects for safety as appropriate, (14) aspects of body language that promote collaboration.
Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedural justice
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Blinded raters will score procedural justice of participants using a standardized rating scale.
The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating greater procedural justice (better outcome).
|
3 months
|
|
Procedural justice
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Blinded raters will score procedural justice of participants using a standardized rating scale.
The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating greater procedural justice (better outcome).
|
6 months
|
|
Disposition-related decision-making
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Participants will report on disposition-related decision-making.
The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating better disposition-related decision-making (better outcome).
|
3 months
|
|
Disposition-related decision-making
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Participants will report on disposition-related decision-making.
The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating better disposition-related decision-making (better outcome).
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael T. Compton, MD, MPH, Columbia University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAU8439
- 8378 (Other Identifier: New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board)
- R01MH128500 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract: National Institute of Mental Health)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Officers' Skills and Behaviors
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...CompletedMindfulness Skills | Interpersonal Effectiveness SkillsSpain
-
The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)Enrolling by invitationTeaching Behaviors | Sign Language SkillsUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityActive, not recruitingMindfulness Skills | Psychosocial EducationChina
-
Bar-Ilan University, IsraelUnknownSocial Skills | Parent-Child Relational ProblemIsrael
-
CEU San Pablo UniversityRecruitingQuality of Life | Skills, CopingSpain
-
Memphis VA Medical CenterU.S. Army Medical Research and Development CommandCompletedCoping Skills | Military Personnel | SpousesUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Completed
-
Massachusetts General HospitalErickson Living Management, LLCActive, not recruitingStress, Psychological | Coping SkillsUnited States
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaWinn Feline Foundation; Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI)CompletedAnxiety | Social SkillsUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed
Clinical Trials on Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training
-
University of RochesterNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of AarhusCentral Denmark RegionCompletedMedical Education | Pediatrics | Patient OutcomesDenmark
-
University of ManitobaHealth Sciences Centre Foundation, ManitobaCompletedMental Health Disorder | Mental Health Impairment | Crisis; Emotional | Psychiatric EmergencyCanada
-
Herzog HospitalCompleted
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Science Council, Taiwan; National Health Research Institutes, TaiwanCompleted
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingSuicidal Ideation | Suicide, Attempted | SuicideBelgium
-
Boston Children's HospitalCompleted
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeCompletedMedical Education, Simulation, Crisis Resource ManagementSingapore
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoCompleted
-
Methodist Health SystemCompletedDecreasing On-Shift Stress With a Crisis Intervention CartUnited States