Trial of Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Mental Health Training for Police Officers

April 21, 2026 updated by: Michael Compton, Columbia University

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Mental Health Training for Police Officers

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the effect, or lack thereof, of the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training among police officers. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Whether the 40-hour CIT training improves police officers' verbal crisis de-escalation skills / non-verbal physical behavior
  • Whether police officers with and without CIT training use different procedural justice and make different disposition-related decisions

Participants will:

  • Receive or not receive CIT training depending on whether they are randomized to the intervention group or the control group.
  • Participate in three assessments: baseline before the randomization, 3-months post-randomization, and 6-month post-randomization.

Researchers will compare police officers who were randomized to the control group with police officers who were randomized to the intervention group to see if receiving the CIT training make differences on the outcome measurements.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI), as well as those experiencing suicidality or psychiatric crisis encounter police officers frequently in the community. Almost a third of people with SMI have police involved in their pathway to mental health care. Although a variety of strategies to reduce law enforcement involvement in mental health crisis response are emerging, people with SMI and/or those in crisis will continue to encounter police when officers must serve as first responders, and importantly, during officers' routine patrol duties. As such, officers need training to safely and effectively interact in these situations. The Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) model is a collaborative approach that includes a 40-hour training of officers. CIT has been implemented in thousands of U.S. communities, and some agencies are now mandating all of their officers complete CIT training. Despite widespread support and growing research, a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) has never been conducted to assess the effectiveness of CIT training on officers' actual skills and behaviors. Prior research has relied on officers' self-report of their de-escalation skills and has not directly measured actual performance in a rigorous, standardized, controlled fashion. Furthermore, multi-site studies are lacking, and potential officer-level factors that may moderate CIT training outcomes have yet to be systematically assessed.

This study will partner with six sites across the country representing diverse geographic areas and constituency demographics. There are four Specific Aims of the study. First, the investigators will conduct a rigorous, multisite randomized controlled trial (RCT) of CIT mental health training. Each agency will provide 40 officers, for a total of 240. Among the 40 officers from each agency, half will be randomized to CIT training. Data will be collected using Standardized Scenarios, which will be rated centrally in a blinded fashion (blinded by site, study arm, and time). The primary outcome is actual verbal crisis de-escalation skills / non-verbal physical behavior. Second, the investigators will determine the impact of CIT training on two secondary outcomes: use of procedural justice and disposition-related decision-making.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

242

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University in the CIty of New York

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • English-speaking
  • Has not yet taken part in CIT training
  • Willing and able to be tested, randomized to CIT training or no training, and re-tested at 3-months and 6-months
  • Employment as a police officer from participating site

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CIT officers
Police officers randomized to the experimental group will receive a 40-hour CIT training curriculum.
Standard 40-hour CIT training given in one week.
Other Names:
  • CIT mental health training
No Intervention: Non-CIT officers
Police officers randomized to the no-intervention group will not receive the 40-hour CIT training curriculum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior Rating (3 months)
Time Frame: 3 months
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior will be assessed via blinded video ratings. The primary outcome is the total score. Domains include: (1) use of reflective statements, (2) use of summarizing/paraphrasing, (3) labelling of emotions, (4) use of encouraging statements, (5) maintaining a conversational tone, (6) seeking clarification from the subject, (7) speaking in a calm and level voice, (8) displaying empathy, (9) displaying honesty, (10) use of simple instructions, (11) asking directly about suicidal ideation, (12) use of space: maintaining appropriate physical distance from the subject, (13) using cover and objects for safety as appropriate, (14) aspects of body language that promote collaboration. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
3 months
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior Rating (6 months)
Time Frame: 6 months
Verbal Crisis De-escalation Skills / Non-Verbal Physical Behavior will be assessed via blinded video ratings. The primary outcome is the total score. Domains include: (1) use of reflective statements, (2) use of summarizing/paraphrasing, (3) labelling of emotions, (4) use of encouraging statements, (5) maintaining a conversational tone, (6) seeking clarification from the subject, (7) speaking in a calm and level voice, (8) displaying empathy, (9) displaying honesty, (10) use of simple instructions, (11) asking directly about suicidal ideation, (12) use of space: maintaining appropriate physical distance from the subject, (13) using cover and objects for safety as appropriate, (14) aspects of body language that promote collaboration. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural justice
Time Frame: 3 months
Blinded raters will score procedural justice of participants using a standardized rating scale. The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating greater procedural justice (better outcome).
3 months
Procedural justice
Time Frame: 6 months
Blinded raters will score procedural justice of participants using a standardized rating scale. The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating greater procedural justice (better outcome).
6 months
Disposition-related decision-making
Time Frame: 3 months
Participants will report on disposition-related decision-making. The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating better disposition-related decision-making (better outcome).
3 months
Disposition-related decision-making
Time Frame: 6 months
Participants will report on disposition-related decision-making. The total score will range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating better disposition-related decision-making (better outcome).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael T. Compton, MD, MPH, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAU8439
  • 8378 (Other Identifier: New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board)
  • R01MH128500 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract: National Institute of Mental Health)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Officers' Skills and Behaviors

Clinical Trials on Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training

Subscribe