Follow-up Study on Recipients of Treatment at the Jerusalem Center for the Treatment of Psychotrauma

September 3, 2013 updated by: Dr. Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk, Herzog Hospital
Researchers examined perceived satisfaction and perceived increase or decrease in symptoms among recipients of treatment at the Jerusalem Center for the Treatment of Psychotrauma, using self report methods. Researchers hypothesized that a significant number of recipients would report a decrease in their symptoms and general satisfaction with the treatment they received.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Researchers conducted a follow-up study of clients of Meytiv, the clinical branch of the Jerusalem Center for the Treatment of Psychotrauma. Researchers plan to use the results of the study to better understand the demographics of those who come to the Center, and to improve the services offered to our clients. Before beginning treatment, every Meytiv client filled out a questionnaire in which information is requested regarding demographics, trauma history, symptoms, and various levels of functioning. Researchers administered a similar self-report questionnaire to all clients upon completion of treatment. The follow-up questionnaire contained the following several indices: the Traumatic Events Screening Inventory (TESI), which requests a client's trauma history; the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, which measures level of family, friend, and other support; the Brief Symptom Inventory, which measures level of various psychiatric symptoms, including somatic complaints, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and paranoid or hostile thoughts; the Self-Efficacy Scale, which measures level of self-reliance and confidence in one's ability to cope with stressors; and PDS, which measures subjective response to trauma, symptoms, and and level of functioning. This questionnaire, which mirrors one completed by all Meytiv's clients before treatment, was administered to those clients who completed treatment within a year of the study. Clients completed the follow-up questionnaire on condition that if they were in need of further treatment, Meytiv would refer them to the appropriate provider. Responses will be coded and analyzed to check significance among potentially related variables, including demographic variables. Most importantly, results of the follow-up questionnaire will be compared to its parallel from the beginning of treatment in order to examine what effects our treatment has on one's symptoms, and whether our clients have been satisfied

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All clients who were exposed to a traumatic event within the last 2 years and completed treatment at the Trauma Center within the last year

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All clients who were exposed to a traumatic event within the last 2 years and completed treatment at the Trauma Center within the last year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clients under the age of 12

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
depressive symptoms, anxiety, PDS, which measures subjective response to trauma, symptoms, and and level of functioning.
Time Frame: April 2007- March 2008
April 2007- March 2008

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
level of family, friend, and other support, Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Aprol 2007- March2008
Aprol 2007- March2008

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Traumatic Events Screening Inventory (TESI)
Time Frame: April 2008- March 2008
April 2008- March 2008

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danny Brom, Ph.D, Israel Center for the Treatment of Psychotrauma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Crisis intervention

3
Subscribe