Performance of Two Hydrophobic IOLs

December 5, 2022 updated by: Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

Capsular Bag Performance of Two Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses of Different Design

Comparison of the capsular bag performance of two hydrophobic intraocular lenses of different design.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Continuous improvements in cataract surgery technique, intraocular lens (IOL) materials, and design over the past few decades, have led to a more safe procedure with satisfactory refractive outcomes and a short rehabilitation time. By that, patients' expectations concerning their postoperative visual quality and refractive outcome are increasing. However, two main problems might occur after cataract surgery: instability of the IOL position in the capsular bag and formation of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Both may decrease the optical performance of an IOL.

The performance of an IOL depends on its behaviour in the capsular bag, which has an influence on the anterior chamber depth (ACD), as well as the postoperative refractive shift, the tilt and decentration of the IOL. Several factors such as IOL design and material, capsulorhexis size, capsular bag diameter, and capsular fibrosis or shrinkage may lead to a suboptimal IOL position. Misalignment of an IOL away from the retina leads to a myopic shift, while towards the retina leads to a hyperopic outcome. This explains why inaccurate prediction of postoperative ACD remains the main source of error in IOL power calculation.

One main goal of modern cataract surgery is to yield a low and predictable ACD shift as well as low degrees of IOL tilt and decentration after surgery in order to achieve ideal optical performance of the IOL.

Another aspect of capsular bag performance of an IOL is posterior capsule opacification (PCO). PCO is one of the most frequent long-term complications after cataract surgery leading to dissatisfying results by decreased visual function. Source of PCO are lens epithelial cells from the equator of the lens capsule, which acquire the ability to migrate and proliferate, causing epithelial ingrowth between the IOL and the posterior capsule. It is estimated that PCO occurs at a rate of 12% one year, 21% three years, and 28% five years after cataract surgery. PCO can be treated with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy. However, complications including an increase in intraocular pressure, ocular inflammation, cystoid macular edema, and retinal detachment may occur after this treatment. Hence lower rates of PCO would improve patients long term safety following cataract surgery. Moreover, it would increase patient satisfaction.

The material and design of an IOL may have an effect on the formation of PCO. Sharp optic edge design has been shown to be a major factor in the prevention of PCO. Furthermore, acrylic and silicone hydrophobic materials showed a lower risk for PCO formation and lower rates of postoperative Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy than hydrophilic IOLs.

In this study the ACD shift and IOL tilt and centration as well as the PCO formation of an IOL with a new design, the Enova GF3 IOL will be compared to a standard monofocal IOL, the Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00.

90 eyes of 45 patients will be included into this study. According to the randomization, the ENOVA GF3 will be implanted in one eye and the ZCB00 in the fellow eye of each patient. Follow-up visits will take place 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the surgery. At each visit a slitlamp examination, non-contact intraocular pressure measurement, refraction, visual acuity testing, biometry, retroillumination photography, and purkinjemeter assessments will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Christoph Spartalis, MD
  • Phone Number: 57564 01 91021
  • Email: office@viros.at

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1140
        • Recruiting
        • Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital Vienna
        • Contact:
          • Oliver Findl, MD, MBA
          • Phone Number: 57564 +43 91021
          • Email: office@viros.at

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 105 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age-related bilateral cataract
  • Age 21 or older
  • Visual acuity > 0.05
  • Normal findings in the medical history and physical examination unless the investigator considers an abnormality to be clinically irrelevant
  • Written informed consent prior to surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Relevant other ophthalmic diseases such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), traumatic cataract, intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome (IFIS), or other co-morbidities that could affect capsular bag stability (e.g. Marfan syndrome)
  • Any ophthalmic comorbidity that may compromise visual function or create problems with measurements (e.g. macular degeneration, amblyopia, corneal scars, etc.)
  • Previous ocular surgery or trauma
  • Pregnancy (pregnancy test will be taken in women of reproductive age)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enova GF3
Patient will receive the monofocal IOL in one eye during cataract surgery
Enova GF3, monofocal IOL
Experimental: Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00
Patient will receive the monofocal IOL in one eye during cataract surgery
Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00, monofocal IOL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anterior chamber depth
Time Frame: 24 months
Anterior chamber depth will be assessed using a biometry device and will be compared between both monofocal IOLs
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IOL tilt
Time Frame: 24 months
IOL tilt will be assessed using the purkinjemeter and will be compared between both IOLs
24 months
Posterior capsule opacification (PCO)
Time Frame: 24 months
PCO will be assessed using retroillumination photography and will be compared between both groups
24 months
Visual acuity
Time Frame: 24 months
Visual acuity will be assessed in the far and intermediate distance using ETDRS charts and will be compared between both groups
24 months
Catquest 9SF questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
The Catquest 9SF questionnaire will be handed out to all patients
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oliver Findl, Prof. Dr., Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Enova

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe