Machine Learning-based Surgical Guidance System for Robot-assisted Rectal Surgery (CoBot2)

February 2, 2026 updated by: Technische Universität Dresden

Machine Learning-based Surgical Guidance System for Robot-assisted Rectal Surgery - a First-in-human Interventional Study

The aim of the study is to evaluate the technical feasibility and applicability of a surgical assistance system based on image recognition algorithms in a first-in-human pilot study. In addition, this study will provide preliminary data on the oncological outcome of the assistance system.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Saxony
      • Dresden, Saxony, Germany, 01307
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with rectal cancer scheduled for robot-assisted rectal resection
  • Intact preoperative urogenital/rectal function
  • Full capability of consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous/Second malignant disease <5 years before diagnosis of rectal cancer
  • Previous abdominal surgery, except for laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy or Cesarean section
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Addiction or illness that prevent the person concerned from assessing the nature and scope of the clinical trial and its possible consequences
  • indication that the participant is unlikely to comply with the trial protocoll (e.g. lack of compliance)
  • official or court order for involuntary hospitalization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Additional visualisation of surgical assistance during surgery
Robot-assisted anterior rectal resection using daVinci® system as CE-marked gold standard with additional visualization of surgical assistance functions based on machine learning techniques

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of discrepancies between the surgeon's preparation and the prediction of the CoBot system
Time Frame: 72 hours after Surgery
System discrepancy score quantifying major misspecifications of the CoBot system in comparison to the surgeon's action
72 hours after Surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operating time [min]
Time Frame: During Surgery
Time from skin incision until placement of last skin staple/suture
During Surgery
Assessment of the difficulty of the preparation
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Surgeon questionnaire, the questionnaire qualitatively assesses nine items, each item scoring from "not at all" to "very much", evaluated individually
48 hours after surgery
Duration of postoperative hospital stay [days]
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed up to 5 days
Postoperative day 1 until day of discharge
At day of discharge, assessed up to 5 days
Duration of postoperative intermediate/intensive care unit stay [days]
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed up to 5 days
Postoperative day 1 until day of discharge
At day of discharge, assessed up to 5 days
Frequency of peri-operative morbidity after resection
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed of up to 5 days
Frequency of peri-operative complications after surgery until Day of Discharge
At day of discharge, assessed of up to 5 days
Kind of peri-operative morbidity after resection
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed of up to 5 days
Kind of peri-operative complications after surgery until day of discharge
At day of discharge, assessed of up to 5 days
Assessment of the circumferential resection margin (CRM)
Time Frame: At day of discharge, assessed up to 5 days
Rate of R0 resections
At day of discharge, assessed up to 5 days
Number of resected lymphnodes
Time Frame: During surgery
Number of lymphnodes resected during surgery
During surgery
Assessment of pelvic function before and after rectal resection
Time Frame: 15 months
Rectal function will be assessed preoperatively and 12-15 months postoperatively using the standard LARS score questionnaire, resulting in a score between 0 and 42. Higher scores mean a worse outcome (worse pelvic function).
15 months
Rectal sphincter function before and after rectal resection
Time Frame: 15 months
Sphincter function will be assessed by manometry preoperatively and 12 - 15 months postoperatively
15 months
Assessment of usability of guidance system
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
One-time final survey of all participating surgeons, the questionnaire qualitatively assesses nine items, each item scoring from "not at all" to "very much", evaluated individually
Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marius Distler, Prof. Dr., University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectum Cancer

Clinical Trials on Additional visualisation of surgical assistance during surgery

Subscribe