Position and Communication Skills Simulation

January 13, 2023 updated by: özlem doğu, Sakarya University

Position and Communication Skills Simulation: Comparison of Two Simulation Models in Nursing Student

The goal of this study was to compare two different simulation applications in developing the positioning skill, one of the most common nursing practices, and the communication skill, which forms the basis of nursing practices.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Serdivan
      • Sakarya, Serdivan, Turkey, 54050
        • Ozlem Dogu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 26 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteering to participate in the research
  • First-year nursing students
  • Not have training in simulation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not meeting the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The students involved in the intervention group were divided into subgroups, and the simulation was carried out using standardized patients. Each subgroup consisted of two students. Students were asked to practice supine and lateral recumbent positions in each scenario.
Nursing students were trained with a standard patient simulation model for position and communication skills education.
No Intervention: Control
The students in the control group were divided into subgroups and practised the supine position and the lateral recumbent position with a high-fidelity manikin. Each subgroup consisted of two students. The applications lasted 5-10 minutes for each group, and after the applications, the debriefing phase was conducted, which lasted 20 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing of two simulation models
Time Frame: 1 month

Describing the performance scores of the students in the standardized patient group and the high-fidelity simulation manikin group.

The checklist consisted of 20 steps. The student scored "0" if "the step was not applied at all" or "the step was applied incorrectly." If the "step was not fully implemented", it was graded with "1" point, and "if the step was performed correctly and completely," it was graded with "2" points. Checklists were filled out by an independent observer, who was not a researcher. Scores that can be obtained from the skill checklist ranged between 0 and 80, which were converted to 100 points.

1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Therapeutic Communication Skills Questionnaire for Nursing Students
Time Frame: 1 month
Therapeutic Communication Skills Questionnaire for Nursing Students: It is a 7-point Likert-type scale and consists of 16 items and three sub-dimensions. The highest total score that can be obtained from the scale is 112, which shows high therapeutic communication skills.
1 month
The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale
Time Frame: 1 month
The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale: The scale has a 5-point Likert-type evaluation structure and consists of 13 items and two sub-dimensions. The highest total score that can be obtained from the scale is 65, which means high satisfaction and self-confidence.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Şengül ÜZEN CURA, Doctorate, Çanakkale on Sekiz Mart Üniversity

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Comparison Simulation Models

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Comparing to Effect Two Simulation Models

Clinical Trials on Standard patient simulation model

Subscribe