Managing Aggression: Effectiveness of Model-Based Standardized Patient Simulation

February 22, 2026 updated by: Reyhan Dogan, Yuksek Ihtisas University

Managing Aggression! Evaluating the Effectiveness of Model-Based Standardized Patient Simulation: A Parallel Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of standardized patient simulation based on "The De-Escalation Model in Simple Form" on nursing students' perceptions of aggression and perceived learning outcomes. Encountering aggressive and violent patient behavior is a common and challenging experience for nursing students. Simulation-based education offers experiential learning opportunities that can enhance students' confidence and clinical decision-making skills.

The study was designed using a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach. The quantitative component consists of a randomized controlled trial design in which participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. Primary and secondary outcome measures related to aggression perception and perceived learning will be assessed post-test in both groups.

The intervention group will receive training based on the De-Escalation Model in Simple Form, followed by participation in an aggression management simulation with a standard patient. After the simulation, qualitative data will be collected from participants in the intervention group to examine their experiences, perceptions, and reactions to the intervention and simulation process.

Quantitative and qualitative findings will be analyzed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the intervention's effectiveness and implementation process. The results of this study are expected to contribute to evidence-based educational practices aimed at improving nursing students' skills in managing aggressive patient behavior.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nursing students frequently encounter aggressive and violent patient behavior during clinical practice, which represents a challenging aspect of professional practice. Inadequate management of aggression can jeopardize the quality of patient care as well as the safety of healthcare workers, patients, and their families. Therefore, developing effective aggression management skills is a critical component of nursing education.

Simulation-based education provides a safe and structured learning environment where nursing students can experience realistic clinical situations without putting patients or themselves at risk. Previous studies have shown that simulation improves students' self-confidence, communication skills, and clinical decision-making abilities. However, evidence regarding structured, model-based simulation interventions specifically designed for aggression management is limited.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of integrated standardized patient simulation with the "De-Escalation Model in Simple Form" on nursing students' perceptions of aggression and perceived learning outcomes.

Research Hypotheses:

H0a: The De-Escalation Model based standardized patient simulation has no statistically significant effect on nursing students' perceptions of aggression.

H1a: The De-Escalation Model based standardized patient simulation has a statistically significant effect on nursing students' perceptions of aggression.

H0b: The De-Escalation Model based standardized patient simulation has no statistically significant effect on nursing students' perceived learning levels.

H1b: The De-Escalation Model based standardized patient simulation has a statistically significant effect on nursing students' perceived learning levels.

The study will conduct a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Quantitative data will be collected using a pre-test-post-test randomized controlled trial with an intervention group and a control group. Qualitative data will be collected concurrently using a phenomenological approach to explore participants' experiences of the standardized patient simulation. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be analyzed separately and integrated during the interpretation phase.

The study will be conducted in a nursing simulation laboratory within the health sciences faculty of a university.

The study population will consist of fourth-year nursing students enrolled in the Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing course during the 2025-2026 academic year. A total of 56 students will be included in the study.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group using a simple randomization method, ensuring an equal number of participants in each group. Each group is planned to include 28 participants. Inclusion Criteria are as follows: (i) being 18 years of age or older, (ii) having taken and successfully passed the Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing course, (iii) agreeing to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria are as follows: (i) refusing to participate in the study The primary outcome measure of the study, perception of aggression, will be measured using the Perception of Aggression Scale. A high mean score on the functional subscale indicates that aggression is perceived as functional/acceptable, while a high mean score on the dysfunctional subscale indicates that aggression is perceived as dysfunctional/unacceptable. The secondary outcome measure of the study, impact of aggression, will be measured using the Impact of Patient Aggression on Carers Scale. A high score on the scale indicates that individuals are highly affected by aggression. The tertiary outcome measure of the study, perceived learning, will be measured using the Perceived Learning Scale. An increase in the scale score indicates an increase in the level of perceived learning. All three outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and after the intervention in both the intervention and control group. In the final stage, qualitative data will be collected from participants in the intervention group to examine their learning experiences and perceptions regarding the simulation and intervention process.

A standardized patient will be used for the simulation intervention. Prior to participation, the standardized patient will be trained on the simulation scenario, expected behaviors, and procedures to ensure consistency between simulation sessions. Written informed consent will be obtained from the standardized patient before the study begins.

Data collection will be conducted in three consecutive phases: (1) Information and pre-test, (2) simulation intervention, and (3) post-test and qualitative data collection.

In the first phase, eligible participants will be informed about the study procedures, objectives, and their rights as participants, and written informed consent will be obtained. Prior to the intervention, baseline assessments of the outcome measures, including participants' perceptions of aggression and perceived learning levels, will be conducted.

In the second stage, only participants in the intervention group will receive training in "The De-Escalation Model in Simple Form" and then participate in an aggression management simulation with a standardized patient. The simulation will be conducted in small groups using a structured and standardized scenario. During the simulation, nursing students are expected to assess environmental safety, recognize early warning signs of aggression, apply the steps of The De-Escalation Model in Simple Form (setting limits, clarifying the situation, and problem-solving), and use therapeutic communication techniques to manage patient agitation. The simulation focuses on non-physical de-escalation strategies and emphasizes patient and staff safety. Each simulation session will begin with a briefing and conclude with a debriefing session facilitated by the research team.

In the final stage, qualitative data will be collected from participants in the intervention group to examine their learning experiences and perceptions of the simulation and intervention process. Subsequently, final test assessments will be administered to both the intervention and control group using the same outcome measures.

IBM SPSS Statistics 27 software will be used for the statistical calculations and analyses of the quantitative data in the study. When evaluating the study data, frequencies (number, percentage) will be used for categorical variables, and descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum) will be used for numerical variables. The normality assumptions of numerical variables will be examined using the Kolmogorov Smirnov normality test. Depending on the normality distribution, parametric (Independent Samples T Test, etc.) or non-parametric (Mann Whitney U, etc.) statistical methods will be used. Statistical significance in the analyses will be interpreted at the p<0.05 level. In the qualitative part of this mixed-methods research, the written responses given by students to the questions asked during the debriefing phase will be examined using the content analysis method from qualitative data analysis methods. In this analysis, the written responses given to the questions asked to students during the simulation's analysis phase will be coded. The data will be organized by analyzing it and placing it into relevant categories. The reporting phase, which is the final step of the content analysis method, will be completed by presenting the content analysis steps and findings.

Participation in this study will be voluntary. All participants will be informed about the study's objectives, procedures, and their rights as participants, and written informed consent will be obtained prior to data collection. Simulation sessions may be video recorded, with the participants' consent, solely for educational and evaluation purposes. All recordings will be stored securely, accessible only to the research team, and permanently deleted after the study is completed. Confidentiality will be ensured through the use of coded data collection forms and secure, password-protected digital storage systems. No personally identifiable information will be included in the data sets, and study data will be used solely for research purposes and will not be shared with third parties. Upon completion of the study, participants in the control group will also be offered the same training and simulation intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Yuksek Ihtisas University, Faculty of Health Sciences
        • Contact:
          • Yuksek Ihtisas University Yuksek Ihtisas University Faculty of Health Sciences
          • Phone Number: +905078640408
          • Email: reyhan.dgn8@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being 18 years of age
  • having taken and successfully passed the Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing course
  • agreeing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusing to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Standardized Patient Simulation Group
Participants assigned to this group will receive a standardized, patient-centered simulation intervention focused on aggression management using the The De-Escalation Model in Simple Form. The simulation takes place in a nursing simulation laboratory and includes a trained, standardized patient who portrays an acutely agitated psychiatric patient. Nursing students are expected to assess environmental safety, recognize early signs of aggression, and apply the steps of The De-Escalation Model in Simple Form using therapeutic communication and tension-reducing strategies. The intervention includes a structured briefing, an active simulation scenario emphasizing non-physical calming strategies and therapeutic communication, and a facilitated debriefing session.

The intervention consists of a standardized patient-based simulation designed to improve nursing students' aggression management skills using the De-Escalation Model.

During the simulation, a trained standardized patient portrays an acutely agitated psychiatric patient in a simulated clinical environment. Nursing students are expected to assess environmental safety, recognize early warning signs of aggression, apply the steps of the De-Escalation Model (setting limits, clarifying the situation, and problem-solving), and use therapeutic communication techniques to de-escalate patient agitation.

The simulation session includes a briefing, an active simulation scenario, and a facilitated debriefing session led by the research team.

No Intervention: Control group

Participants in the control arm will receive standard theoretical instruction on aggression management as part of the regular Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing curriculum, without participation in a standardized patient simulation.

No simulation-based or experiential intervention will be provided to this group during the study period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception of Aggression (Perception of Aggression Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention
The scale consists of 29 items and has two subscales: Functional (acceptable-healthy reaction) and Dysfunctional (unacceptable-undesirable aggression). The scale is a five-point Likert-type scale. A score between 29 and 145 is obtained from the entire scale. A high mean score on the functional subscale indicates that aggression is perceived as functional/acceptable, while a high mean score on the dysfunctional subscale indicates that aggression is perceived as dysfunctional/unacceptable.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of aggression (Impact of Patient Aggression on Carers Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention
The scale consists of 7 items and has two factors: "Deterioration of the Relationship with the Patient" and "Not Feeling Safe." Points are tallied based on the responses given to the items that make up the factors. A high score on the scale indicates that individuals are highly affected by aggression.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Learning (Perceived Learning Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention
The scale consists of 9 items and has three factors. The "cognitive" factor of the scale aims to measure cognitively perceived learning. The second factor, the "affective" factor of the scale, aims to measure affectively perceived learning. The third factor, which aims to measure psychomotor learning as perceived, is called 'psychomotor'. A score between 9 and 63 is obtained from the entire scale. An increase in the scale score indicates an increase in the perceived level of learning.
Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Reyhan DOĞAN, Yuksek Ihtisas University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aggression

Clinical Trials on Standardized Patient Simulation Based on the De-Escalation Model in Simple Form

Subscribe