a Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Vestibular and Dual Task on Balance in Diplegic Children

January 18, 2023 updated by: Amira Ashraf Mahmoud Mohamed, Cairo University

a Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Vestibular Versus Dual Task Training on Balance in Children With Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

the study is carried out to identify If there is any difference between the effectiveness of Vestibular training and Dual task training on balance in children with Diplegic Cerebral Palsy.

so in this study the sample will be divided into two equal groups, each group will recieve only one type of training ( vestibular training or dual task training ) the balance of the diplegic children will be assessed before and after using HUMAC balance system and pediatric balance scale , the results will be compared between both groups and if there is one training is more effective than the other , it will be recommended most in the future treatment program.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

A comparative experimental design was used. Children participating in this study were assigned into two equal groups, Thirty four children with diplegic Cerebral Palsy of both genders who have balance problems were selected to join this study with the following criteria:

  1. all the children diagnosed as diplegic cerebral palsy.
  2. Their age are range from 5 to 10 years old.
  3. The degree of spasticity is between grade 1 or 1+ according to Modified Ashworth Scale (Charalambous ,2013).
  4. They are at level I OR II on Gross Motor Function Classification System .
  5. All the children were able to follow verbal command and instructions.

And Children were excluded in the presence of the following:

  1. Children that suffer from epilepsy.
  2. Severe visual and auditory problems.
  3. Structural or fixed soft tissue deformities of Lower extremities.
  4. Severe mental retardation.
  5. Botox injection in the lower extremity in the past 6 months..

all the children will be assigned in one of two groups ( vestibular training group and dual task group ) the training will be continue for definite period of time , and the balance abilities for the children in each group will be assessed before and after the treatment completely ended and the result will be compared to conclude which group benefit more and have a greater balance improvement and the treatment that causes a greater improvement will be more recommended in the future physical therapy plan for treatment of diplegic cerebral palsied children.

the balance is assessed using HUMAC balance system and pediatric balance scale .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. clinical diagnosis of diplegic cerebral palsy .
  2. age range : from 5 to 10 years old.
  3. The degree of spasticity is between grade 1 or 1+ according to Modified Ashworth Scale (Charalambous ,2013).
  4. They are at level I OR II on Gross Motor Function Classification System .
  5. All the children were able to follow verbal command and instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children that suffer from epilepsy.
  2. Severe visual and auditory problems.
  3. Structural or fixed soft tissue deformities of Lower extremities.
  4. Severe mental retardation.
  5. Botox injection in the lower extremity in the past 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: vestibular training
balance training that focus on vestibular system stimulation like when the eyes are folded while standing on a balance board or walking on swinging boards
balance training in the form of vestibular training
Experimental: dual task training
The children received special balance training in the form of dual-task training performing balance activities as a basic task in conjunction with second task that includes upper limb activity using basketball and long rings shaft or cognitive task like telling a story during balance training .
balance training in the form of dual task training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static Balance
Time Frame: 2 months of training
static balance will be assessed using HUMAC balance system , a comparison of the results between two groups will be carried out , and the more effective treatment program will be more recommended than the other
2 months of training
dynamic balance
Time Frame: 2 months of training
dynamic balance will be assessed using pediatric balance scale and a comparison between the results of the two groups will be done to recommend one over the other.
2 months of training
which training will be more beneficial for the diplegic child balance
Time Frame: 2 months
after the results of both groups (for static and dynamic balance) are analyzed one treatment will be recommended most (the treatment for the group that has greater balance improvement ).
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: amira A mahmoud, Cairo university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/003716

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on vestibular training

Subscribe