The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose on Postoperative Anemia in Spinal Deformity Surgery

June 10, 2025 updated by: Weiyun Chen, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose on Postoperative Anemia in Patients Undergoing Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

The prognosis of patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery is often compromised by perioperative anemia due to iron deficiency. The aim of this randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate whether postoperative ferric derisomaltose intravenous injection may improve anemia and prognosis in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery comparing with oral iron. Participants will be randomly assigned to the treatment group (intravenous ferric derisomaltose) and the control group (oral iron). Changes in hemoglobin concentration, percentage of anemia correction, changes in iron indicators, patient quality of life, and incidence of adverse events will be analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iron isomaltoside infusion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Iron deficiency is a common cause of perioperative anemia in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Anemia may lead to increased postoperative complications and mortalities, prolonged hospital stays, deteriorated physical function, and severely affect the quality of life.

Oral iron has been widely recommended to treat perioperative anemia. However, the pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6 (Interleukin-6), TNF-a (Tumor necrosis factor-α)) produced by the inflammatory state after surgery can lead to an increase in hepcidin, which greatly affects the absorption of oral iron. Compared to oral iron, intravenous iron can circumvent the effects of decreased iron absorption in the gastrointestinal tract due to the postoperative inflammatory state and achieve faster and more effective iron supplementation. At present, intravenous iron supplements are mainly second-generation products, including iron sucrose and ferric gluconate. However, the unstable molecular structure of second-generation iron supplements may cause oxidative stress, which limits its administration in large doses.

Compared with traditional intravenous iron, the third-generation iron preparations allow more iron (1000 mg (milligram) or more, no more than 20 mg/kg (kilogram)) to be infused within a short period of time (15-60 minutes), improving patient compliance, reducing costs and complications caused by multiple infusions, and is promising to improve anemia more rapidly. Ferric derisomaltose, as the only third-generation iron currently available in China market, has showed its value in treating anemia in joint replacement surgeries. However, the effectiveness of postoperative intravenous ferric derisomaltose in spinal deformity surgery remains uncertain. Therefore, we designed this prospective randomized trial to evaluate whether intravenous ferric derisomaltose may improve anemia and prognosis in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery compared with oral iron.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. Received spinal deformity surgery
  3. 70 g/L ≤ Hb ≤ 110 g/L at POD1, or Hb at POD1 showed a decrease of

    ≥20 g/L compared with baseline

  4. Informed consent was obtained voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant.
  2. known serious hypersensitivity to other parenteral iron products
  3. Non-iron deficiency anemia (e.g., hemolytic anemia)
  4. Decompensated liver insufficiency
  5. Coexisting active infection
  6. Drug abuse, including but not limited to opioids, amphetamines, methamphetamine, ketamine, etc.
  7. Other conditions that the investigator considers inappropriate for participation (e.g. deafness, Parkinson's disease, communication disorders, etc.)
  8. Participation in another clinical trial within three months prior to this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group

Iron to be administered as oral ferrous succinate:

1 tablet (100 mg) tid (three times daily), starting on the first postoperative day and continuing for 4 weeks.

Daily oral dose of 100 mg iron (ferrous succinate) tid postoperatively
Experimental: Treatment group

Iron to be administered as intravenous ferric derisomaltose:

Where Hb (hemoglobin) ≥100 g/L, dosage according to body weight is as follows:

Body weight <50 kg: 500mg; Body weight 50 to <70 kg: 1000 mg; Body weight ≥70 kg: 1500 mg.

Where Hb <100 g/L, dosage according to body weight is as follows:

Body weight <50 kg: 500mg; Body weight 50 to <70 kg: 1500mg; Body weight ≥70 kg: 2000 mg.

The maximial dose should not exceed 20mg/kg body weight, rounded off to the nearest 100mg

Single intravenous dose ferric derisomaltose
Other Names:
  • MONOFER®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hemoglobin concentration
Time Frame: At 14 days
Change in hemoglobin concentrations from POD(postoperative day)1 to POD14
At 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in hemoglobin concentration
Time Frame: At 5 days
Change in hemoglobin concentrations from POD1 to POD5
At 5 days
Change in hemoglobin concentration
Time Frame: At 35 days
Change in hemoglobin concentrations from POD1 to POD35
At 35 days
Correction of anemia
Time Frame: At 5 days
The percentage of effective correction of anemia (elevation of Hb >20g/L or Hb ≥120g/L) at POD5
At 5 days
Correction of anemia
Time Frame: At 14 days
The percentage of effective correction of anemia (elevation of Hb >20g/L or Hb ≥120g/L) at POD14
At 14 days
Correction of anemia
Time Frame: At 35 days
The percentage of effective correction of anemia (elevation of Hb >20g/L or Hb ≥120g/L) at POD35
At 35 days
Change in serum iron
Time Frame: At 5 days
Change in serum iron from POD1 to POD5
At 5 days
Change in serum iron
Time Frame: At 14 days
Change in serum iron from POD1 to POD14
At 14 days
Change in serum iron
Time Frame: At 35 days
Change in serum iron from POD1 to POD35
At 35 days
Change in ferritin
Time Frame: At 5 days
Change in ferritin from POD1 to POD5
At 5 days
Change in ferritin
Time Frame: At 14 days
Change in ferritin from POD1 to POD14
At 14 days
Change in ferritin
Time Frame: At 35 days
Change in ferritin from POD1 to POD35
At 35 days
Change in transferrin saturation
Time Frame: At 5 days
Change in transferrin saturation from POD1 to POD5
At 5 days
Change in transferrin saturation
Time Frame: At 14 days
Change in transferrin saturation from POD1 to POD14
At 14 days
Change in transferrin saturation
Time Frame: At 35 days
Change in transferrin saturation from POD1 to POD35
At 35 days
Change in soluble transferrin receptor
Time Frame: At 5 days
Change in soluble transferrin receptor from POD1 to POD5
At 5 days
Change in soluble transferrin receptor
Time Frame: At 14 days
Change in soluble transferrin receptor from POD1 to POD14
At 14 days
Change in soluble transferrin receptor
Time Frame: At 35 days
Change in soluble transferrin receptor from POD1 to POD35
At 35 days
Barthel Index
Time Frame: At 5 days
Independence in daily activities measured by the Barthel questionnaire at POD 5
At 5 days
Barthel Index
Time Frame: At 14 days
Independence in daily activities measured by the Barthel questionnaire at POD 14
At 14 days
Barthel Index
Time Frame: At 35 days
Independence in daily activities measured by the Barthel questionnaire at POD 35
At 35 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: At 3 months
Hospitalized days
At 3 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: At 3 months
Incidence of adverse events
At 3 months
Infection
Time Frame: At 3 months
Incidence of postoperative infection
At 3 months
EQ-5D
Time Frame: At 5 days
Quality of life measured by EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at POD5
At 5 days
EQ-5D
Time Frame: At 14 days
Quality of life measured by EQ-5D at POD14
At 14 days
EQ-5D
Time Frame: At 35 days
Quality of life measured by EQ-5D at POD35
At 35 days
Fatigue score
Time Frame: At 5 days
Fatigue measured FACIT-F (The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) questionnaire at POD5
At 5 days
Fatigue score
Time Frame: At 14 days
Fatigue measured FACIT-F questionnaire at POD14
At 14 days
Fatigue score
Time Frame: At 35 days
Fatigue measured FACIT-F questionnaire at POD35
At 35 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Weiyun Chen, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
  • Study Director: Jianxiong Shen, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Coded data is anticipated to be shared with potential collaborators.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Anticipated that data from the study will become available within 5 years after publication of main data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data would only be shared with IRB approved collaborators.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Ferric derisomaltose

Subscribe