Interest of an Attentional Evaluation by a Computerized Battery in the Management of Concussion in Young Rugby Players (NeuropsyCor)

April 27, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
The goal of this study is to test the ability of a computerized neuropsychological battery to identify attentional disorders resulting from a concussion occurring during the practice of rugby. Thirty young people with a concussion (11-25 years old) will take several neuropsychological tests. Researchers will compare their results with those of young athletes without concussion to see the effect of concussion.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objective is to carry out a complete neuropsychological assessment, detailing the attentional and executive aspects using the TAP computerized battery. In addition, various paper-and-pencil tests, standardized in French, more commonly used in the context of neuropsychological data related to concussions in athletes, will also be administered. These assess processing speed, short-term memory and auditory-verbal working memory capacity, episodic memory and selective attention. This preliminary study would make it possible to shed light on the links that may exist between performance in the various tests proposed and the characteristics inherent in the symptomatology of concussion. Furthermore, it seems relevant to compare the results of computerized tests with other paper-and-pencil tests but also with the performance of individuals who have no history of concussion with the practice of a non-contact sport.

The results of this study would make it possible in practice to have a neuropsychological assessment more specific to cerebral concussion, with a potentially reduced consultation time due to the use of more sensitive tools, and therefore, an earlier rehabilitative intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 25 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients :
  • concussion in the context of the practice of rugby
  • French or reading French without help
  • Controls :
  • no concussion
  • practicing a non-contact sport (athletics, rowing, badminton, capoeira, circus, running, crossfit, cycling, dancing, climbing, fencing, fitness, golf, gymnastics, bodybuilding, swimming, skating, Qi Gong, Taï chi, tennis, table tennis, shooting, trail running, volleyball, water polo) within a sports association
  • age matched to patient (+/- 1 year)
  • study level matched to patient (+/- 1 year)
  • French or reading French without help

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients :
  • Legal protection measure
  • Other neurological or psychiatric pathologies prior to concussion episodes
  • Diagnosis of a neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood
  • Score less than or equal to 5/19 on the "Matrix" subtest (intellectual retardation)
  • Addictive behaviors
  • Current major depressive disorder or treated with antidepressants or benzodiazepines for less than 3 months
  • Severe visual or motor problems that may interfere with the performance of the tests
  • Controls :
  • Legal protection measure
  • History of proven concussion
  • Other neurological or psychiatric pathologies
  • Diagnosis of a neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood
  • Score less than or equal to 5/19 on the "Matrix" subtest (intellectual retardation)
  • Addictive behaviors
  • Current major depressive episode or treated with antidepressants or benzodiazepines for less than 3 months
  • Severe visual or motor problems that may interfere with the performance of the tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neuropsychological tests
The neuropsychological tests are computerized (TAP battery) or paper-and-pencil tests. They assess processing speed, short-term memory and auditory-verbal working memory capacity, episodic memory and selective attention.

List of neuropsychological tests:

  • Matrix reasoning
  • D2-R
  • Coding
  • Symbol search
  • Digit span
  • Alertness (computerized TAP battery)
  • Divided Attention (computerized TAP battery)
  • Go / No go (computerized TAP battery)
  • Incompatibility (computerized TAP battery)
  • Working memory (computerized TAP battery)
  • 16-item Free and Cued Recall or Stories subtest of the Children Memory Scale (CMS) for children only (< 17 years old)
  • complex figure of the memory efficiency battery 144 or Word pairs of the Children Memory Scale for children only (< 17 years old)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alertness time
Time Frame: At inclusion
Reaction time (ms) in the Alertness TAP test
At inclusion
Alertness error
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in the Alertness TAP test
At inclusion
Divided Attention time
Time Frame: At inclusion
Reaction time (ms) in the Divided Attention TAP test
At inclusion
Divided Attention error
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in the Divided Attention TAP test
At inclusion
Go/No-go time
Time Frame: At inclusion
Reaction time (ms) in the Go/No-go TAP test
At inclusion
Go/No-go error
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in the Go/No-go TAP test
At inclusion
Incompatibility time
Time Frame: At inclusion
Reaction time (ms) in the Incompatibility TAP test
At inclusion
Incompatibility error
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in the Incompatibility TAP test
At inclusion
Working Memory time
Time Frame: At inclusion
Reaction time (ms) in the Working Memory TAP test
At inclusion
Working Memory error
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in the Working Memory TAP test
At inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Matrix reasoning
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in Matrix reasoning test
At inclusion
Coding
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in coding test
At inclusion
Symbol
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors symbol search test
At inclusion
Digit span
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in digit span test
At inclusion
16-item free and cued recall
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of recall words in 16-item free and cued recall test
At inclusion
Complex figure
Time Frame: At inclusion
Score in the complex figure of the memory efficient battery 144. Score is determined by the number of elements of the figure recalled.
At inclusion
Stories
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in stories subtests of the Child Memory Scale (CMS)
At inclusion
Word pairs
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in word pairs subtests of the Child Memory Scale (CMS)
At inclusion
D2-R error
Time Frame: At inclusion
Number of errors in D2-R tests
At inclusion
D2-R time
Time Frame: At inclusion
Time (in seconds) to complete the D2-R test
At inclusion
Sociodemographic data
Time Frame: At inclusion
age and level of study of participants
At inclusion
Headaches
Time Frame: At inclusion
Presence or absence of headaches
At inclusion
Amnesia
Time Frame: At inclusion
Presence of anterograde or retrograde amnesia
At inclusion
SCAT
Time Frame: At inclusion
Symptom severity score on the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT), range 0-132 (minimum-maximum), a higher score representing a more severe concussion
At inclusion
Sleep
Time Frame: At inclusion
Change in sleep (presence of hyper or insomnia)
At inclusion
Consciousness
Time Frame: At inclusion
Loss of initial consciousness or not
At inclusion
Position
Time Frame: At inclusion
Player position in the rugby team
At inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tiphaine Vidal, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 9, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 9, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Concussion, Brain

Clinical Trials on Neuropsychological tests

Subscribe