Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Treating Mandibular Cystic Defects

February 19, 2023 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

The Effect of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in the Treatment of Mandibular Cystic Defects (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Mandibular cystic defect healing is a complex process. Various methods have been developed to shorten the bone regeneration time and improve its quality. Autogenous grafting is the gold standard for filling cystic defects due to the osteogenesis property provided by the viable cells but is related to donor site morbidity. Allografts and Xenografts are used for the same purpose. However, the increased cost is their main disadvantage. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate is now used to enhance the healing and regeneration process in many areas of the body with no morbidity and low cost.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Azarita
      • Alexandria, Azarita, Egypt, 00203
        • Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from mandibular cystic defect.
  • Cystic defect width of 4-8 cm that requires removal under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients contradicting operation.
  • Previously enucleated lesions.
  • Previous surgery, tumor, infection to the pelvis affecting the anterior iliac crest.
  • Infected Cysts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
patients were treated conventionally by enucleation and plain collagen sponge only.
Experimental: Test group

The iliac crest is palpated along its widest part forming the iliac tubercle ( 5-6 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine), then a 5 mm incision is made 3-4 cm posterior to the ASIS directly on the crest.

The needle is advanced between the outer and inner plates of the ileum for a 4-6 cm into the cancellous bone and 10 ml of bone marrow is aspirated.

Bone marrow aspirate is processed by a dual centrifugation technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain scores
Time Frame: 1st day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
pain was assessed through a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) the scores are categorizied as follows: (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe)
1st day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
Change in bone density
Time Frame: at baseline, 3 months, 6 months
An immediate postoperative CBCT was be obtained, followed by another one taken after 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The Region of Interest (ROI) feature was used to estimate the mean bone density in the immediate and 6 months scans. The mean bone density in the 6 months CBCT-scan was compared with the immediate postoperative and the preoperative scans and the mean difference between the scans was calculated.
at baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in wound dehiscence
Time Frame: 1st day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 6 weeks
any signs of wound dehiscence were observed
1st day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BM_22

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandible Cyst

Clinical Trials on Enucleation and filling by Bone marrow aspirate

Subscribe