Palliative Care for Patients With Dementia

May 19, 2026 updated by: Laura Gelfman, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Palliative Care at Home for Patients With Dementia and Their Caregivers

A multi-site, single-blinded, parallel, randomized-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel model of in-home palliative care for dementia patients and their family caregivers. From inpatient and outpatient settings associated with four hospitals across New York City, patients with advanced dementia and their family caregivers will be randomized to intervention or augmented control.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to study the impact of a new home based palliative care program on patients' symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with care, completion of advance care planning documentation and receipt of care consistent with preferences. In addition, the study will examine the impact of this model of care on patient healthcare utilization, including hospitalization, emergency department utilization, and hospice use prior to death. The trial will also include patients' caregivers, in order to examine the impact of the intervention on caregiver burden and prevalence of depression.

Patients randomized to the intervention will be scheduled for an intake visit. This visit will be undertaken by the team's registered nurse and/or social worker, together with a community health worker, and other team members (advanced practice nurse, MD), depending on patients' needs. Visits will combine a combination of video-teleconferencing technology and in person visits. Following this visit, and in conjunction with the nurse practitioner and/or MD, a care plan will be developed to address areas of clinical need highlighted during the intake visit.

Patients in the intervention arm will receive ongoing monitoring and input (telephone-based, video-based, and in-person) from members of the clinical team, dependent on their identified needs. Patients' cases will be discussed at the weekly IDT meeting, as appropriate to the level of clinical need. Patients and caregivers will be provided with access to a 24 hour telephone line, staffed by a Mount Sinai based physician, which acts as an advice line out of hours. These physicians will be able to provide advice to patients and caregivers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have advanced dementia, based on Global Deterioration Score (GDS)>6
  • impairment in at least one activity of daily living (ADL -which is inherent in this level of GDS)
  • at least one hospitalization or ED visit within the last 12 months
  • a physician who is primarily responsible for their dementia-related care whose clinical outpatient site is associated with one of the four Mount Sinai sites in Manhattan
  • a family caregiver willing to enroll
  • a residence in Manhattan where they are currently living (not in a long-term care facility)
  • capacity to consent or a legal representative available to provide consent
  • fluency in English or Spanish, or their legal representative must be fluent in English or Spanish
  • age >64.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not have a family caregiver to enroll
  • Does not reside in Manhattan outside of long-term care facility
  • Does not have fluency in English or Spanish Doesn't

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Palliative care at home
Randomized to intervention arm
Patients/caregivers will be cared for by an interdisciplinary team that includes a social worker, nurse, community health worker, nurse practitioner, and physician.
Active Comparator: Augmented control
Randomized to augmented control (visits to the caregiver from a CHW without training in dementia or palliative care)
Patients/caregivers will be cared for by an interdisciplinary team that includes a social worker, nurse, community health worker, nurse practitioner, and physician.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom Management as measured by the End of Life for Dementia scale
Time Frame: 6 months
This will be determined using a validated structured questionnaire administered to patient-subjects or caregiver via telephone interview or in person by the trained research coordinator. The Symptom Management at the End of Life in Dementia (SM-EOLD) scale responses range from 0 to 45 with higher scores indicating better symptom management.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Hospital Admissions
Time Frame: at 12 months
Acute care utilization as measured by the number of hospital admissions
at 12 months
Number of Hospital Stays
Time Frame: at 12 months
Acute care utilization as measured by the number of hospital days
at 12 months
Patient reported treatment concordance
Time Frame: at 12 months
The Study Team will examine if the care patients receive is concordant with the care they wanted to receive using simple chart review of whether care received matches stated preferences (yes/no).
at 12 months
Cost Analysis
Time Frame: at 12 months
Total costs between the arms including inpatient, emergency department, ambulatory services, and home care services will be compared. Costs of the clinical intervention (e.g. clinical personnel, transportation) will be included in the analyses.
at 12 months
Caregiver burden per Zarit Burden Inventory
Time Frame: at 6 months
Zarit Burden Inventory to determine caregiver burden by using a validated structured 22-item questionnaire administered to caregiver-subjects via telephone interview or in person by the trained research coordinator. Each item is on a 5-point scale range from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Full scale from 22 - 110, higher score indicates a greater burden.
at 6 months
Caregiver burden per Zarit Burden Inventory
Time Frame: at 12 months
Zarit Burden Inventory to determine caregiver burden by using a validated structured 22-item questionnaire administered to caregiver-subjects via telephone interview or in person by the trained research coordinator. Each item is on a 5-point scale range from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Full scale from 22 - 110, higher score indicates a greater burden.
at 12 months
Caregiver satisfaction measured using FAMCARE-10
Time Frame: at 6 months
FAMCARE-10 to assess caregiver satisfaction by using a validated 10-item structured questionnaire administered to patient-subjects via telephone interview or in person by the trained research coordinator. Full scale ranges 0-20, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
at 6 months
Caregiver satisfaction measured using FAMCARE-10
Time Frame: at 12 months
FAMCARE-10 to assess caregiver satisfaction by using a validated 10-item structured questionnaire administered to patient-subjects via telephone interview or in person by the trained research coordinator. Full scale ranges 0-20, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.
at 12 months
Caregiver depression measured by PHQ-9 Score
Time Frame: at 6 months
PHQ-9 to assess Caregiver Depression by using a validated structured 9 item questionnaire administered to caregiver-subjects via telephone interview or in person by the trained research coordinator. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). Full scale from 0-27, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
at 6 months
Caregiver depression measured by PHQ-9 Score
Time Frame: at 12 months
PHQ-9 to assess Caregiver Depression by using a validated structured 9 item questionnaire administered to caregiver-subjects via telephone interview or in person by the trained research coordinator. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). Full scale from 0-27, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms.
at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura P Gelfman, MD, MPH, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GCO 19-1232
  • R01AG067045 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ('learned intermediary') identified for this purpose.

For individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals should be directed to christian.espino@mssm.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Home Palliative Care

Subscribe