Trial of Cladribine and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LoDAC) Alternating With Decitabine vs. Hypomethylating Agents (HMA) Plus Venetoclax as Frontline Therapy for AML or High-Grade MDS in Patients Unfit for Intensive Induction

April 16, 2025 updated by: University of Florida

Phase II Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Cladribine and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LoDAC) Alternating With Decitabine vs. Hypomethylating Agents (HMA) Plus Venetoclax as Frontline Therapy for AML or High-Grade MDS in Patients Unfit for Intensive Induction

This phase II, open-label, randomized trial will compare the efficacy of the novel regimen of cladribine/low-dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine to the current standard of care regimen of hypomethylating agents (decitabine or azacitidine) plus venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are either elderly or unfit for intensive induction. Subjects will be randomized to be treated with either cladribine/low-dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine (Arm A) or decitabine or azacitadine plus venetoclax (Arm B).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 60 years.

    • Adults < 60 years are eligible if deemed unfit for intensive induction by their treating physician (or choose to receive a non-intensive regimen due to patient's preference)
  • Diagnosis of treatment-naive AML (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with hydroxyurea) or high grade MDS defined as >10% marrow blasts or R-IPSS of intermediate 2 risk or higher with > 10% bone marrow blasts, and 1 or more of the following:

    • Circulating blasts in peripheral blood
    • Rapidly declining blood counts over the past 8 weeks, as determined by treating investigator
    • Transfusion dependence
    • Adverse cytogenetic changes or molecular mutations with high risk of rapid progression to AML, as determined by treating investigator
    • Significant B-symptoms attributed to MDS (weight loss, fatigue, unexplained fever, night sweats)
    • Evidence of clonal evolution with emergence of new cytogenetic changes or new mutations compared to previous bone marrow biopsy.
  • White blood cell count < 25 K/uL. Cytoreduction with hydroxyurea is allowed prior to enrollment to obtain white blood cell count < 25 K/uL.
  • Subjects of childbearing potential (SOCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test and agree to use of an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for at least 4 months after the last dose of study drug. Prior to study enrollment, subjects of childbearing potential must be advised of the importance of avoiding pregnancy during trial participation and the potential risk factors for an unintentional pregnancy. Subjects with partners of child-bearing potential must agree to use physician-approved contraceptive methods (e.g., abstinence, condoms, vasectomy) throughout the study and should avoid conceiving children for 4 months following the last dose of study drug.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML, APL, AML-M3)
  • Patient with active central nervous system leukemia
  • Karnofsky performance status < 50 at screening

    • Karnofsky performance status of 40-50 is allowed to proceed on study if the patient had a performance status of 50-100 at screening and the decline to 40 is deemed definitely related to disease (AML/MDS).
  • Patients with AML with molecular mutations with FDA approved targeted therapies in the first line setting.

    • This includes FLT3 ITD/TKD + AML, IDH1+ AML. (Note: IDH2+ AML has targeted therapy approved in relapsed setting only; FDA approval for first line setting is pending and will be excluded once approval is obtained).
  • Subjects with familial AML/MDS syndromes and those with inherited DNA repair syndromes like Fanconi Anemia
  • Concurrent illness that in the opinion of the Investigator would pose an undue risk to the subject participating in this clinical study.
  • Severe kidney impairment CrCL < 10 mL/min (per Cockcroft Gault equation) or dialysis-depended renal failure
  • Class III-IV NYHA heart failure
  • Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis
  • Known seropositivity or active viral infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) unless fully treated and negative by PCR. Patients who are seropositive because of HBV vaccine are eligible.
  • Subjects with uncontrolled life-threatening infections

    • Subjects with fever (temperature > 38.3 C) thought to be related to AML/MDS are eligible
  • History of allergic reaction to hypomethylating agents (decitabine, azacitidine), venetoclax, cladribine, or cytarabine.
  • Active solid tumor malignancy requiring treatment within previous 2 years.

    • Patients with prior history of malignancy who completed treatment > 2 years prior to baseline are eligible to enroll if there is currently no evidence of disease and all toxicities of prior treatments are resolved.
  • Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated, or subjects who are compulsorily detained for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical illness.
  • Known psychiatric or substance abuse disorder that would interfere with the participant's ability to cooperate with the requirements of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A (investigational arm): cladribine, cytarabine, and decitabine
Subjects will be given 5 mg/m2 cladribine intravenously on days 1-5 of cycle 1 and on days 1-3 of cycles 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17 and 18.
Subjects will be given 20 mg cytarabine subcutaneously twice daily on days 1-10 of cycles 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17 and 18.
Subjects will be given 20 mg/m2 decitabine intravenously on days 1-5 of cycles 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15 and 16
Active Comparator: Arm B (control arm): azacitidine with venetoclax or decitabine with venetoclax
Subject will take 400 mg venetoclax orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle.
Subjects will be given either 20 mg/m2 decitabine intravenously on days 1-5 of each cycle or 75 mg/m2 azacitidine intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1-7 of each cycle. The treating physician will determine which drug each subject will receive.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of complete remission
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare the rate of complete remission (per 2017 European LeukemiaNet criteria for AML response assessment) in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to complete remission
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare time to complete remission (per 2017 European LeukemiaNet criteria for AML response assessment) in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax
18 months
Time to minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare time to MRD negativity (as measured by multicolor flow cytometry per current NCCN guidelines) in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax
18 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: 30 months
Compare overall survival (defined as the time from date of randomization until date of death) in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax
30 months
Overall response rate
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare overall response rate (defined as the number of patients who achieve either complete or partial remission per 2017 European LeukemiaNet criteria for AML response assessment) in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax
18 months
Time to overall response
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare time to overall response in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax. Time to overall response is defined as the time interval from the date of treatment initiation to achievement of overall response.
18 months
Rate of MRD negativity
Time Frame: 18 months
Compare rate of MRD negativity (as measured by multicolor flow cytometry per current NCCN guidelines) in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax
18 months
Event-free survival
Time Frame: 30 months
Compare event-free survival in patients treated with cladribine/cytarabine alternating with decitabine to that for patients treated with decitabine or azacitidine and venetoclax. Event-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to induction treatment failure, relapse in those with a complete remission after induction, or death from any cause.
30 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Crispen, MD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Cladribine

Subscribe