- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05769361
Training Programs Effects on Strength and Balance in Older Adults
Effect of a 12-week Training Program With Unstable Devices on Strength and Dynamic Balance in Older Adults
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The a-priori power analysis calculation reported a total sample size of 51 participants. We decided to increase the sample size of approximatively 20% hypothesizing an increment of drop-outs due to the not completely solved COVID-19 pandemic at the time of the study.
In this single-blinded randomized controlled study, both intervention groups received 24 training sessions of 45 minutes each, twice a week for 12 weeks.The two intervention groups and the control group were tested at the baseline (T0), after six weeks (T1), and after twelve weeks (T2).
Subjects of the intervention groups had to complete at least 21 out of 24 training sessions. Moreover, all subjects had to complete all the assessments. Otherwise, they were completely excluded from the data analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Padova, Italy, 35131
- Nutrition and Exercise Lab, DSB, University of Padova
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- self-sufficiency in daily living activities;
- aged between 65 and 85 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- non-corrected sight disorders
- neurological disorders
- regular assumption of drugs that can interfere with normal cognitive functioning
- pathologies that contraindicate physical activity practice
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Unstable (UNST)
12-week training protocol with unstable devices, twice a week.
|
Strength and balance training using different destabilizing devices
|
|
Experimental: Stable (ST)
12-week training protocol with stable devices, twice a week
|
Strength and balance training over firm surfaces
|
|
No Intervention: Control (CTRL)
No administration of training protocols.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Center of Pressure (CoP) Unit Path
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test: - The mean velocity of the CoP measured in cm∙s-1 (Unit Path) over a 2.5-second time window from the beginning of the perturbation; |
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
|
Center of Pressure (CoP) Area95
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test: - The area of the 95th percentile confidence ellipse of the CoP measured in cm2 (Area95) over a 2.5-second time window from the beginning of the perturbation. |
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
|
Center of Pressure (CoP) First Peak
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test: - First peak (FP) as the difference in centimeters between the peak reached by the CoP displacement after the external perturbation and the mean value of the anterior-posterior CoP displacement before the perturbation. |
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
|
Center of Pressure (CoP) Maximal Oscillation
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test: - Maximal oscillation of the CoP anterior-posterior displacement as the sum in centimeters of the absolute values of FP and the subsequent peak. |
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
|
Center of Pressure (CoP) Post Perturbation Variability
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test: - The standard deviation (SD) of the CoP anterior-posterior displacement over a 2.5-second time window from the beginning of the perturbation as the post perturbation variability (PPV), measured in centimeters. |
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
|
Lower limb isometric strength
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
Isometric quadriceps maximal strength (Newton) measured with an instrumented chair.
Specifically, a load cell is placed perpendicular to the subject's shank and collects the force in Newton expressed by the subject while sitting on the chair.
The knee angle during the maximal effort is fixed at 90 degrees.
|
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
Stand up from a chair, walk at the preferred pace to a cone at 3 meters, turn around, and walk back to the chair to sit down.
The outcome is the time measured in seconds to complete the test.
|
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
|
10-meter walking test
Time Frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
Walking 20 meters in a straight line at the preferred speed.
The outcome is the time measured in seconds to complete the distance from the 5th to the 15th meter.
|
At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNST2223
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fall
-
University of AmsterdamCompletedDeprescribing | Fall | Fall Injury | Fall Patients | Accidental FallNetherlands
-
Betul Esra CevikCompletedAccidental Fall | Fall Prevention | Fall Risk FactorsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Brown UniversityNot yet recruitingFall | Fall Prevention | Fall Injury Prevention
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUnknownFall Injury | Fall Prevention | Fall Safety
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCricoCompletedFall Injury | Fall PatientsUnited States
-
University of ArizonaVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Neuroscience Research AustraliaThe University of New South WalesCompleted
-
Aalborg University HospitalCompleted
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...VU University of AmsterdamNot yet recruitingFall | Aged | Fall Injury | Fall Patients | Polypharmacy | Accidental Fall | Aged, 80 and Over | DeprescriptionsNetherlands
-
Dalarna UniversitySormland County Council, SwedenRecruiting