- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05773027
Integrated Alcohol and Sexual Assault Intervention for College Men
March 15, 2023 updated by: Lindsay Orchowski Ph.D., Lifespan
This research will evaluate a new intervention that integrates evidence-based alcohol intervention strategies and promising sexual assault prevention strategies with the goal of decreasing sexual aggression among men who report heavy drinking; a particularly high risk group.
Specifically, this study will conduct a randomized controlled pilot trial with college men who report heavy drinking to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the proposed intervention.
The main questions the study will answer are: 1) what is the feasibility of the recruitment plans, research design, intervention training methods, and delivery of the program?; and 2) does the intervention, relative to a mindfulness-based control condition, produce reductions in the quantity and frequency of alcohol use, perpetration of sexual aggression, and attitudes associated with sexual aggression over the 2- and 6-month follow-up.
Follow-up assessments are completed at 2- and 6-months following the program.
The intervention is compared to the mindfulness-based control group.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
115
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02904
- Rhode Island Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 22 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Male
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Engaging in binge drinking, defined as 5 or more drinks per day for men on the same occasion by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration on two or more occasions in the past month.
- Engaging in oral, vaginal, or anal sexual intercourse with a female partner one or more times in the past four months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Displaying symptoms consistent with alcohol use withdrawal
- Reporting current suicidal or homicidal ideation
- Meeting criteria consistent with a diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sexual Assault and Alcohol Feedback and Education (SAFE)
SAFE includes a motivational interviewing session addressing alcohol use and risk for sexual aggression, a workshop addressing alcohol use and sexual aggression, and a booster session review.
|
SAFE includes a motivational interviewing session addressing alcohol use and risk for sexual aggression, a workshop addressing alcohol use and sexual aggression, and a booster session review.
|
|
Active Comparator: Mindfulness-Based Control Condition
The program includes the same amount of contacts as SAFE, including an individual session focused on mindfulness and stress, a group session, and a booster session review.
|
The program includes the same amount of contacts as SAFE, including an individual session focused on mindfulness and stress, a group session, and a booster session review.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Alcohol use, heavy drinking quantity
Time Frame: Change from baseline alcohol use at 6 months.
|
Number of heavy drinking days in the past month (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 31), assessed via the timeline follow-back.
Greater scores mean worse outcomes.
|
Change from baseline alcohol use at 6 months.
|
|
Alcohol use, drinks per week
Time Frame: Change from baseline alcohol use at 6 months.
|
The average number of drinks per week (Minimum = 0, Maximum = unspecified), assessed via the timeline follow-back.
Greater scores mean worse outcomes.
|
Change from baseline alcohol use at 6 months.
|
|
Sexual aggression perpetration
Time Frame: Change in severity and frequency in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the sexual experiences survey.
Scored based on frequency and severity (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 63).
Higher scores mean worse outcomes.
|
Change in severity and frequency in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Protective behavioral strategies
Time Frame: Change in protective behavioral strategy use in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the Self Control Questionnaire (Minimum = 37, Maximum = 185).
Higher scores mean more positive outcomes.
|
Change in protective behavioral strategy use in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
|
Perceived peer drinking norms
Time Frame: Change in perceived peer norms relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the drinking norms rating form (Minimum = 0, Maximum = unspecified).
Higher scores mean worse outcomes.
|
Change in perceived peer norms relative to control at 6-months.
|
|
Perceived peer norms regarding sexual aggression: Perceived peer bystander intervention
Time Frame: Change in perceived peer bystander intervention in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the sexual social norms inventory, perceived peer bystander intervention (Minimum = 8, Maximum = 40, higher scores better outcomes).
|
Change in perceived peer bystander intervention in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
|
Perceived peer norms regarding sexual aggression: Perceived peer engagement in sexual coercion
Time Frame: Change in perceived peer engagement in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the sexual social norms inventory, regarding perceived peer engagement in sexual coercion (Minimum = 7, Maximum = 35, lower are better outcomes).
|
Change in perceived peer engagement in comparison to control at 6-months.
|
|
Perceived peer norms regarding sexual aggression: Peer comfort with sexual aggression
Time Frame: Change in peer comfort with sexual aggression relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the sexual social norms inventory, perception of peer comfort with sexual aggression (Minimum = 7 , Maximum = 35, lower are better outcomes).
|
Change in peer comfort with sexual aggression relative to control at 6-months.
|
|
Attitudes relating to sexual aggression: Rape myth acceptance
Time Frame: Change in rape myth acceptance relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the rape myth acceptance scale (Minimum = 7, Maximum = 140, higher are worse outcomes).
|
Change in rape myth acceptance relative to control at 6-months.
|
|
Attitudes relating to sexual aggression: Hyper gender ideology
Time Frame: Change in hyper gender ideology and increases relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the hyper gender ideology scale (Minimum = 19, Maximum = 114, higher scores are worse outcomes).
|
Change in hyper gender ideology and increases relative to control at 6-months.
|
|
Attitudes relating to sexual aggression: Labeling of consent
Time Frame: Change in labeling of consent relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the labeling of consent scenarios (Minimum = 1, Maximum= 10, higher scores are better outcomes).
|
Change in labeling of consent relative to control at 6-months.
|
|
Bystander intervention intention to help strangers
Time Frame: Change in intention to help strangers relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the intentions to help strangers scale (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 800, higher scores are better outcomes).
|
Change in intention to help strangers relative to control at 6-months.
|
|
Bystander intervention intention to help friends
Time Frame: Change in intent to help friends relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the bystander intentions to help friends scale (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 1000, higher scores are better outcomes).
|
Change in intent to help friends relative to control at 6-months.
|
|
Bystander intervention attitudes
Time Frame: Change in bystander attitudes relative to control at 6-months.
|
Assessed via the bystander attitudes scale (Minimum = 51, Maximum = 255, higher scores are better outcomes).
|
Change in bystander attitudes relative to control at 6-months.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Motivation to change
Time Frame: Change in motivation relative to control from baseline to immediately after the session.
|
Assessed via the Contemplation latter (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 10, higher scores are better outcomes).
|
Change in motivation relative to control from baseline to immediately after the session.
|
|
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Change in self-efficacy relative to control at from baseline to immediately after the session.
|
Assessed via the brief situational confidence questionnaire (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 100, higher scores are better outcomes).
|
Change in self-efficacy relative to control at from baseline to immediately after the session.
|
|
Drinking intentions
Time Frame: Change in drinking intentions relative to control from baseline to immediately after the session.
|
Assessed via the drinking intention weekly report (Minimum = 0, Maximum = Unspecified, higher scores are worse outcomes).
|
Change in drinking intentions relative to control from baseline to immediately after the session.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 17, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 13, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
December 13, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 15, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
March 17, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 17, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 15, 2023
Last Verified
March 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R34AA020852 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Data sharing requests can be made by contacting the study PI.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data can be requested from the PI .
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
A data sharing agreement can be requested by contacting the PI.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alcohol Drinking
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedDrinking Behavior | Adolescent Behavior | Drinking, Alcohol | Alcohol Drinking, AdolescentUnited States
-
University of Auckland, New ZealandTe Hiringa Hauora/Health Promotion AgencyCompletedDrinking, Alcohol | Consumption, AlcoholNew Zealand
-
Penn State UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Boston University Charles River CampusActive, not recruiting
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNot yet recruitingHazardous Drinking | Harmful Alcohol Use
-
University of WyomingRecruiting
-
Binghamton UniversityNot yet recruitingUnderage Drinking | Drinking, Teen | Adolescent Alcohol UseUnited States
-
Butler HospitalNational Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)CompletedDrinking, AlcoholUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongRecruitingmHealth Intervention | AlcoholHong Kong
-
Real Prevention, LLCCompletedUnderage Drinking | Alcohol Use, UnderageUnited States
Clinical Trials on SAFE
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRecruitingSafety Issues | Firearm InjuryUnited States
-
Sahlgrenska University HospitalCompletedHip Fracture | Urinary Retention | Adherence | Urinary Catheters | Documentation Skill | UTI - Urinary Tract Infection | Sustainability of InnovationsSweden
-
New York UniversityTerminatedChild Sexual AbuseUnited States
-
Sarah BlaylockVA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedFall | Low VisionUnited States
-
WestatChildren's Bureau - Administration for Children and FamiliesCompletedIn Foster Care | At Risk for Foster
-
Penang Hospital, MalaysiaCompletedContinuous Ambulatory Peritoneal DialysisMalaysia
-
University of California, San DiegoNot yet recruitingSexual Violence | Safety | Alcohol | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
-
Ayse Sonay Turkmen, Prof.DrCompletedSafety Issues | Newborn; FitTurkey
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterCompletedInfant Development | SIDSUnited States
-
Germans Trias i Pujol HospitalCompleted