- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05788939
PLANNED VISUAL EDUCATION ABOUT SKIN CANCER
June 13, 2023 updated by: Celal Bayar University
DOES PLANNED VISUAL EDUCATION AFFECT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS ABOUT SKIN CANCER?
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of planned visual education based on the Health Belief Model on university students' attitudes and beliefs toward skin cancer.
The planned visual education based in Health Belief Model has possitive effects on univestiy students' attitudes and beliefs toward skin cancer.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of planned visual education based on the Health Belief Model on university students' attitudes and beliefs toward skin cancer.
Planned as a cluster-randomized controlled experimental study conducted on two groups (n=116).
The study was carried out in Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences (FEAS) and Hasan Ferdi Turgutlu Faculty of Technology (HFTFT) from the faculties of Manisa Celal Bayar University (MCBU) between February-Semptember 2019.
Among seven departments in FEAS and four departments in the HFTFT, simple random sampling was used to draw lots again.
The Department of Econometrics from the FEAS was assigned as the intervation groups (n=58) and Mechatronics Engineering from HFTFT was assigned as the control group (n=58).
Data were collected using The Student Introduction Form and The Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
116
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Manisa, Turkey
- CelalBayarU
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 24 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- who Registered and continuing department courses
- who agreed to participate in the study
- who had formal education
- who been second year students
Exclusion Criteria:
- Registration and absence of the student in the department courses
- Refusal to participate in the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: intervention group
The sample of this cluster randomized controlled experimental study consisted of 2nd year university students (n=116) training in Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences (FEAS) and Hasan Ferdi Turgutlu Faculty of Technology (HFTFT) from the faculties of Manisa Celal Bayar University (MCBU) between February-Semptember 2019.
Among the faculties in MCBU, simple random sampling was used to draw lots, with the first lot being assigned to FEAS as the intervention group (IG), and the second lot being assigned to HFTFT as the control group (CG) .
Among seven departments in FEAS and four departments in the HFTFT, simple random sampling was used to draw lots again.
The Department of Econometrics from the FEAS was assigned as the IG and Mechatronics Engineering from HFTFT was assigned as the CG.
The planned visual education based Health Belief Model was given.
|
The students in IG were administered the planned visual education based on Health Belief Model for a period of seven months. The education materials were a PowerPoint presentation, a skin cancer model, videos titled "Dear 16 years old me", "Mr. Sun", a brochure, and 3 posters. . |
No Intervention: Control group
No attempt was made by researcher during the study.
Only data were collected.
At the end of the study, the planned visual education based Health Belief Model was given and all students continued in the study were given key rings with pictures about sun protection designed by the researchers.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer
Time Frame: One months
|
Developed by Dogan and Caydam (2021), the scale consists of 26 items and 5 sub-dimensions (perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy).
The HBMSSC is a five-point Likert-type scale, and each item is answered from "disagree=1" to "strongly agree=5".
The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.86, and for the sub-dimensions it is 0.89; 0.79; 0.77; 0.65 and 0.86, respectively.
The "perceived barriers" sub-dimension of the scale is reverse coded.
The scale does not have a total score, and each sub-dimension is scored within itself.
Higher "perceived susceptibility, "perceived benefit, "perceived severity", and "self-efficacy" scores indicate higher perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, and self-efficacy
|
One months
|
The Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer
Time Frame: Three months
|
Developed by Dogan and Caydam (2021), the scale consists of 26 items and 5 sub-dimensions (perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy).
The HBMSSC is a five-point Likert-type scale, and each item is answered from "disagree=1" to "strongly agree=5".
The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.86, and for the sub-dimensions it is 0.89; 0.79; 0.77; 0.65 and 0.86, respectively.
The "perceived barriers" sub-dimension of the scale is reverse coded.
The scale does not have a total score, and each sub-dimension is scored within itself.
Higher "perceived susceptibility, "perceived benefit, "perceived severity", and "self-efficacy" scores indicate higher perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, and self-efficacy
|
Three months
|
The Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer
Time Frame: Seven months
|
Developed by Dogan and Caydam (2021), the scale consists of 26 items and 5 sub-dimensions (perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy).
The HBMSSC is a five-point Likert-type scale, and each item is answered from "disagree=1" to "strongly agree=5".
The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.86, and for the sub-dimensions it is 0.89; 0.79; 0.77; 0.65 and 0.86, respectively.
The "perceived barriers" sub-dimension of the scale is reverse coded.
The scale does not have a total score, and each sub-dimension is scored within itself.
Higher "perceived susceptibility, "perceived benefit, "perceived severity", and "self-efficacy" scores indicate higher perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, perceived severity, and self-efficacy
|
Seven months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Barbaric J, Sekerija M, Agius D, Coza D, Dimitrova N, Demetriou A, Safaei Diba C, Eser S, Gavric Z, Primic-Zakelj M, Zivkovic S, Zvolsky M, Bray F, Coebergh JW, Znaor A. Disparities in melanoma incidence and mortality in South-Eastern Europe: Increasing incidence and divergent mortality patterns. Is progress around the corner? Eur J Cancer. 2016 Mar;55:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.019. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
- Livingstone E, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Eigentler TK, Rompel R, Trefzer U, Nashan D, Rotterdam S, Ugurel S, Schadendorf D. A first prospective population-based analysis investigating the actual practice of melanoma diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Sep;47(13):1977-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 May 24.
- Birch-Johansen F, Jensen A, Mortensen L, Olesen AB, Kjaer SK. Trends in the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in Denmark 1978-2007: Rapid incidence increase among young Danish women. Int J Cancer. 2010 Nov 1;127(9):2190-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25411.
- Karagas MR, Zens MS, Li Z, Stukel TA, Perry AE, Gilbert-Diamond D, Sayarath V, Stephenson RS, Barton D, Nelson HH, Spencer SK. Early-onset basal cell carcinoma and indoor tanning: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e4-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3559.
- Armstrong AW, Idriss NZ, Kim RH. Effects of video-based, online education on behavioral and knowledge outcomes in sunscreen use: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 May;83(2):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.033. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
- Stanton WR, Chakma B, O'Riordan DL, Eyeson-Annan M. Sun exposure and primary prevention of skin cancer for infants and young children during autumn/winter. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Apr;24(2):178-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00139.x.
- Wesson KM, Silverberg NB. Sun protection education in the United States: what we know and what needs to be taught. Cutis. 2003 Jan;71(1):71-4, 77.
- Makin JK, Warne CD, Dobbinson SJ, Wakefield MA, Hill DJ. Population and age-group trends in weekend sun protection and sunburn over two decades of the SunSmart programme in Melbourne, Australia. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jan;168(1):154-61. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12082.
- Celik S, Ilce A, Andsoy II. Knowledge and Protective Behaviors About Skin Cancer Among Nursing Students in the West Black Sea Region of Turkey. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1188-5.
- Balyaci OE, Kostu N, Temel AB. Training program to raise consciousness among adolescents for protection against skin cancer through performance of skin self examination. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(10):5011-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.10.5011.
- Glanz K, Steffen AD, Schoenfeld E, Tappe KA. Randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention for children: the Project SCAPE family study. J Health Commun. 2013;18(11):1368-83. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.778361. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
- Nahar VK, Ford MA, Hallam JS, Bass MA, Hutcheson A, Vice MA. Skin Cancer Knowledge, Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Preventative Behaviors among North Mississippi Landscapers. Dermatol Res Pract. 2013;2013:496913. doi: 10.1155/2013/496913. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
- Haney MO, Bahar Z, Beser A, Arkan G, Cengiz B. Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Skin Cancer and Sun Knowledge Scale in Nursing Students. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Feb;33(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1041-2.
- Khani Jeihooni A, Hidarnia A, Kaveh MH, Hajizadeh E. The effect of a prevention program based on health belief model on osteoporosis. J Res Health Sci. 2015 Winter;15(1):47-53.
- Kissal A, Kartal B. Effects of Health Belief Model-Based Education on Health Beliefs and Breast Self-Examination in Nursing Students. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Oct-Dec;6(4):403-410. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_17_19.
- Tuong W, Armstrong AW. Effect of appearance-based education compared with health-based education on sunscreen use and knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Apr;70(4):665-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
- Trinh N, Novice K, Lekakh O, Means A, Tung R. Use of a brief educational video administered by a portable video device to improve skin cancer knowledge in the outpatient transplant population. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Nov;40(11):1233-9. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000148.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 20, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 16, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
March 29, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 15, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 13, 2023
Last Verified
June 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-186
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
ll IPD that underlie results in a publication
IPD Sharing Time Frame
starting 6 months after publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
It can be shared upon request, if the relevant ethics committee approves.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- CSR
Study Data/Documents
-
Informed Consent Form
Information comments: Dogan ES, Caydam OD. Investigation of Studies Conducted with Health Belief Model in Skin Cancer. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal.2019; 2(2):66-75.
-
Statistical Analysis Plan
Information comments: Dogan ES, Caydam OD. A Scale Development Study: Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer among Turkish University Students. Saudi Journal of Nursing and Health Care. 2021; 4(8): 205- 213. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjnhc.2021.v04i08.001.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Skin Neoplasm
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingAdvanced Malignant Skin Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Skin NeoplasmUnited States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm | Malignant Thoracic Neoplasm | Malignant Head and Neck Neoplasm | Malignant Breast NeoplasmUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingAdvanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Refractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Unresectable Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm | HER2-Positive Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityCompletedBreast Cancer | Metastasis, NeoplasmChina
-
Fudan UniversityIstituto Superiore di SanitàCompletedBreast Cancer | Metastasis, NeoplasmChina
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterU.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command; U.S. Army Medical Research...CompletedBreast Carcinoma | Malignant Breast Neoplasm | Benign Breast NeoplasmUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute, ThailandCompleted
-
Umbria Bioengineering TechnologiesToscana Life Sciences Sviluppo s.r.l.; London South Bank University; ELAROS 24... and other collaboratorsRecruitingWomen's Health: Neoplasm of BreastItaly, Spain, Poland, Portugal, Switzerland
-
Istanbul Aydın UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of OviedoCompletedWomen's Health: Neoplasm of BreastSpain
Clinical Trials on Planned Visual Education Based on Health Belief Model
-
Gazi UniversityCompleted
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedDiabetes Mellitus | Family MembersTurkey
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedBreastfeeding EducationTurkey
-
Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences UniversityCompletedOral HealthIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Marmara UniversityNot yet recruitingBreast Cancer Awareness and BSE in Visually Impaired WomenTurkey
-
Cumhuriyet UniversityNot yet recruitingFear of Childbirth | Self-efficacyTurkey
-
Yuzuncu Yıl UniversityAtaturk UniversityCompletedType2 Diabetes MellitusTurkey
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedType 2 DiabetesTurkey
-
Ataturk UniversityCompleted