Youth Ending the HIV Epidemic (YEHE)

August 1, 2024 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Youth Ending the HIV Epidemic - Automated Directly Observed Therapy Pilot: Improving HIV Care Among Youth

Young adults have a disproportionately high rate of HIV infection, high rates of attrition at all stages of the HIV care continuum, an increased risk of antiretroviral therapy (ART) nonadherence and virologic failure, and a high probability of disease progression and transmission. Tracking and monitoring objective measures of ART adherence in real time is critical to strategies to support adherence and improve clinical outcomes. However, adherence monitoring often relies on self-reported and retrospective data or requires extra effort from providers to understand adherence patterns, making it difficult for providers to accurately determine how to support their patients in real time. In the proposed interventional study, the investigators aim to pilot test an automated directly observed therapy intervention paired with conditional economic incentives to improve ART adherence among youth living with HIV (YLWH) (18-29 years-old) who have an unsuppressed HIV viral load.

Aim 1: Conduct a pilot study to assess feasibility and acceptability of the use of automated directly observed therapy with conditional economic incentives (aDOT-CEI) among YLWH (aged 18-29; N= 30) at AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) clinics in California and Florida. Primary outcomes will be feasibility and acceptability, assessed using predefined feasibility metrics and acceptability surveys at three months.

Aim 2: Explore experiences of YLWH and staff/providers with the aDOT-CEI intervention and implementation facilitators and barriers. The investigators will conduct in-depth qualitative interviews with a sample of YLWH from Aim 1 and staff/providers purposively selected from participating AHF clinics to explore intervention experiences, potential influences on ART adherence, individual-level and clinic-level barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation, and suggested refinements for a future efficacy trial.

The investigators hypothesize that the aDOT-CEI intervention to improve ART adherence among YLWH will have high feasibility and acceptability.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Automated directly observed therapy (aDOT) is an innovative technology that uses artificial intelligence (AI) with computer vision and deep learning algorithms to track and support adherence through a smartphone. Additionally, aDOT provides a seamless and convenient platform for providing Conditional Economic Incentives (CEIs) because it monitors real-time adherence to automatically determine who can receive incentives. For the design and development of the mobile health app, the investigators have partnered with AiCure to use an existing HIPAA-compliant mobile health app. The investigators will invite YLWH from AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) sites in CA and FL to form the study Youth Advisory Panel (YAP) and seek their input on the AiCure app. The investigators will work with AiCure to implement any required changes to the app that have emerged from formative research. The app will then be piloted with YLWH (aged 18-29; N= 30) who will use the platform for a period of 3 months (Aim 1).

The app will record video of the participant taking their HIV medication in order to monitor the participant's medication adherence. Participants will complete online surveys at baseline and 3 months. The investigators will have monthly check-ins with participants which the investigators will assess app use and help increase study engagement. The investigators will measure feasibility and acceptability through app paradata (i.e., app use information) and self-report in surveys (baseline, 3 months). And the investigators will use adherence-related medical record data from AHF to compare against adherence monitored by the AiCure app.

Following completion of the pilot, the investigators will conduct in-depth interviews (IDIs) with YLWH and staff /providers purposively selected from participating AHF clinics (Aim 2). Interviews will explore intervention experiences, potential influences on current and long-term ART adherence, unaddressed adherence barriers and the potential benefit of features (e.g., reminders), individual-level and clinic-level barriers and facilitator to intervention implementation, assess ease of use of aDOT-CEI, likes and dislikes, and suggested modifications for a future efficacy trial.

This interventional pilot study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of aDOT-CEI and will provide preliminary data to inform an R01 to test the efficacy of aDOT-CEI in addressing disproportionately low viral suppression among YLWH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 29 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 29 years of age
  • Have access to a smartphone
  • Can speak and read English
  • Client is at an AHF clinic in California or Florida
  • Client has an unsuppressed HIV viral load at least 3 months post HIV diagnosis
  • Client is on once daily oral antiretroviral therapy
  • Consent to participate in the proposed study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • YLWH who are newly HIV diagnosed in the past 3 months
  • Smartphone is a Samsung galaxy s21 or iPhone 5SE (app is not supported by these phones)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
All YLWH who choose to enroll in the study will receive access to AiCure, the mobile health application. The participants will be asked to use the app for 3 months, during which the investigators will assess the feasibility and acceptability of AiCure.
For the design and development of the mobile health app, we have partnered with AiCure to use an existing HIPAA-compliant mobile health app. The app will record video of the participant taking their HIV medication in order to monitor the participant's medication adherence and track incentives for this behavior in real-time.
Other Names:
  • AiCure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: Rate of Participant Retention
Time Frame: 3 Months
Rate of Participant Retention will be calculated as the percent of those who were retained in the study and completed the final survey.
3 Months
Feasibility: Mean Logins Per Week
Time Frame: 3 months
Mobile app data from the AiCure Application (paradata) will be used to measure the number of participant logins per week and thereby calculate mean logins per participant per week.
3 months
Feasibility: Mean Number of Seconds in App Per Day
Time Frame: 3 months
Mobile app data from the AiCure Application (Paradata) will be used to measure the number of seconds each participant spends in that app each day, thereby calculating the mean number of seconds in app per day per participant.
3 months
Feasibility: Mean Percent Doses a Participant May Have "Falsified" Med-taking
Time Frame: 3 months
The AiCure mobile application platform uses an artificial intelligence or AI platform to recognize dosing patterns recorded by users that do not correspond to what has been defined as 'normal' dosing by the AI. The AI accordingly flags any video recording featuring abnormal dosing for review by the AiCure Video Review team. Upon confirmation of abnormal dosing, the AiCure Video Review team notifies the research coordinator in the form of a "Red Alert". Each of these "Red Alerts" message will be counted as an event of intentional nonadherence, and the mean number of times a participant may have "falsified" medication taking will be calculated and compared against the number of 'normal' doses.
3 months
Acceptability: System Usability Scale (SUS) >68, Considered Above Average and Acceptable
Time Frame: 3 months
The acceptability of the AiCure Mobile application will be through the System Usability Scale (SUS). The intervention was considered acceptable if ≥80% had a SUS score >68, which is considered above average acceptability.
3 months
Acceptability: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) Score of ≥17, Considered Above Average and Acceptable
Time Frame: 3 months
Client satisfaction will be measured using a Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is an 8-item scale with higher values indicating higher satisfaction. Acceptability was set as a cutoff of 80% having a score of ≥17, which is the score cutoff considered above average and acceptable for this measure.
3 months
Acceptability: Likelihood of Recommending the Study to a Friend (Extremely, Very)
Time Frame: 3 months.
Recommend study to a friend. 7-point Likert Scale of how likely participants are to recommend the study to a friend. The intervention was considered acceptable if ≥80% reported likely or very likely to recommend.
3 months.
Acceptability: Satisfaction With the App+Incentives (Mostly, Very)
Time Frame: 3 months
Client satisfaction with the app+incentives. 7-point Likert Scale values from 1-7 with lower values corresponding to least satisfaction and higher values corresponding to greater satisfaction.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Monitoring of Behavior: Frequency of App Related Issues
Time Frame: 3 months
Did you ever have trouble accessing app, using adherence monitoring, receiving reminders, receiving incentives, or finding a private place? 7-point Likert of frequency ranging from often to never with high value corresponding to app related issues occurring with greater frequency and lower value corresponding to app related issues issues occurring with lesser frequency.
3 months
Mean Percent Adherence Over the Study Period (Excluding Those Lost to Follow up)
Time Frame: 3 months
Adherence data will be abstracted from the automated directly observed therapy platform within the AiCure mobile health application. Percent adherence will be calculated as the percentage of days over the study period that participants recorded taking their medication within the app.
3 months
Median Self-Reported Adherence Score at Study Exit
Time Frame: 3 months
The preliminary effect on ART adherence will be measured through self-report using a 3-item scale that has been previously validated. Questions ask about frequency of missed medications in the last 30 days, adherence frequency in the last 30 days, and adherence rating in the last 30 days. Reponses to the 3 questions were transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better adherence. A summary score was calculated as the mean of the 3 individual items.
3 months
Monitoring of Behavior: Number of Seconds in App
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of seconds in app collected using mobile app data (paradata) from AiCure platform.
3 months
Monitoring of Behavior: Ease of Use
Time Frame: 3 months
How easy/difficult was it to use your personal phone; use adherence monitoring; receive incentives? Measured using a 7-point Likert Scale ranging from easy to difficult. Higher values correspond to greater ease of use, lower values correspond to greater difficulty.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Parya Saberi, PharmD, UCSF School of Medicine, Division of Prevention Science

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 24, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on aDOT-CEI

Subscribe