Revascularization Versus Medical Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (RESTORE-PCI)

March 12, 2025 updated by: Young Bin Song, Samsung Medical Center

Randomized Controlled Trial of Revascularization Versus Medical Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function

Randomized trial to compare clinical outcomes between revascularization versus medical treatment alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ischemic cardiomyopathy, the term used to describe systolic dysfunction due to chronic myocardial ischemia from ischemic heart disease, is the most common form of heart failure. To adapt to this ischemic environment, myocardium is known to undergo downregulation that may revert after adequate perfusion is re-established, a phenomenon known as myocardium hibernation. This phenomenon has been a background for the main concept of management for ischemic cardiomyopathy via revascularization. Indeed, the recent 10-year follow-up reports from STICH trial demonstrated improved long-term clinical outcomes after coronary bypass graft surgery than optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is another intervention that is commonly used to revascularize significant coronary stenosis. Despite common belief that revascularization by PCI would improve perfusion to ischemic myocardium and improve clinical outcomes, several clinical trials have failed to show beneficial impact of PCI over OMT in stable ischemic heart disease other than symptomatic improvement. Recently published REVIVED trial compared effect of PCI and OMT in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% and demonstrable viable myocardial segments, and found no significant difference in clinical outcomes of both groups.

However, whether PCI optimized by additional information can make a difference in this setting remains unanswered. It is known that intravascular imaging and coronary physiologic testing using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) result in better outcomes compared to conventional angiography alone. IVUS provides anatomical information regarding the lumen, plaque, and plaque characteristics, and can optimize stent placement minimizing stent-related problems and lead to better outcomes. On the other hand, FFR provides information on amount of ischemia which the stenosis in question is causing, and also improves the quality of PCI which has been demonstrated by multiple previous trials. Unfortunately, proportion of IVUS and FFR use is not disclosed in REVIVED trial, and it is possible there is a room for improvement if the PCI is further guided by these adjunctive diagnostic procedures in regard to the clinical outcomes.

In this regard, it is our hypothesis that PCI guided and optimized by intravascular imaging and FFR-guided strategy would bring additional benefit that may result in significant difference of prognosis for ischemic cardiomyopathy compared to OMT alone. Randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis would provide valuable evidence to guide treatment strategy for ischemic cardiomyopathy. Therefore, RESTORE-PCI trial has been designed to compare clinical outcomes after state-of-the-art PCI or OMT for ischemic cardiomyopathy.

The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes between revascularization versus medical treatment alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction. Primary hypothesis is that revascularization guided by invasive physiologic indexes and optimized by intravascular imaging device plus optimal medical treatment (OMT) would reduce risk of primary composite end point (major adverse cardiac events [MACE], a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), admission for heart failure, or advanced heart failure requiring LVAD or transplantation) than OMT alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

900

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be at least 19 years of age
  • Patients with stage C heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction<40%
  • Patients with significant coronary artery stenosis (diameter stenosis>50% with proven inducible myocardial ischemia by invasive physiologic assessment)
  • Coronary artery disease is amenable for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
  • Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive approach and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Myocardial infarction by universal definition within 4 weeks of randomization
  • Non-viable myocardium in myocardial viability test (cardiac magnetic resonance, dobutamine-stress echocardiography, delayed single-photon emission computerized tomography, or aneurysmal change in echocardiography)
  • Target lesions not amenable for PCI by operators' decision
  • Patients who need left ventricular assisted device (LVAD) or heart transplantation at the time of randomization
  • Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Heparin, or Everolimus
  • Known true anaphylaxis to contrast medium (not allergic reaction but anaphylactic shock)
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <2 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Guideline-directed medical treatment group
In the GDMT group, medical treatment for patients with left ventricular dysfunction will be performed under current ACC/AHA/SCAI or ESC/EACTS guidelines for heart failure.
Experimental: Revascularization group

In the revascularization group, patients will undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using standard techniques under current ACC/AHA/SCAI or ESC/EACTS guidelines. In the revascularization group, the procedure must be within 2 weeks of randomization.

Revascularization criteria is presented as below. Revascularization indication

  1. Diameter stenosis >90% by visual assessment
  2. Functionally significant stenosis (FFR≤0.80 or non-hyperemic pressure ratios≤0.89)
  3. Chronic total occlusion with substantial ischemic territory. The below locations will be judged as having substantial ischemic territory.

    • Left main artery
    • Proximal to mid left anterior descending artery
    • Proximal left circumflex artery in left dominant coronary arterial system
    • Proximal to distal right coronary artery in right dominant coronary arterial system

Revascularization indication

  1. Diameter stenosis >90% by visual assessment
  2. Functionally significant stenosis (FFR≤0.80 or non-hyperemic pressure ratios≤0.89)
  3. Chronic total occlusion with substantial ischemic territory. The below locations will be judged as having substantial ischemic territory.

    • Left main artery
    • Proximal to mid left anterior descending artery
    • Proximal left circumflex artery in left dominant coronary arterial system
    • Proximal to distal right coronary artery in right dominant coronary arterial system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
major adverse cardiac events [MACE]
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), admission for heart failure, or advanced heart failure requiring LVAD or transplantation
2 years after last patient enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause death
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
All-cause death
2 years after last patient enrollment
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Cardiac death
2 years after last patient enrollment
Any myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Any myocardial infarction by Forth Universal definition of MI
2 years after last patient enrollment
Spontaneous myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Spontaneous myocardial infarction by Forth Universal definition of MI
2 years after last patient enrollment
Procedure-related myocardial infarction
Time Frame: After index procedure
Procedure-related myocardial infarction by ARC II definition
After index procedure
Admission for heart failure
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Admission for acute decompensated heart failure
2 years after last patient enrollment
Advanced heart failure requiring LVAD or transplantation
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Advanced heart failure requiring LVAD or transplantation
2 years after last patient enrollment
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D)
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Incidence of Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) for documented ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (secondary prevention).
2 years after last patient enrollment
Clinically-indicated unplanned revascularization
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Clinically-indicated unplanned revascularization
2 years after last patient enrollment
Stroke
Time Frame: 2 years after last patient enrollment
Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
2 years after last patient enrollment
EQ-5D-5L (quality of life)
Time Frame: at 6 month after index procedure
EQ-5D-5L (quality of life)
at 6 month after index procedure
SAQ (angina severity)
Time Frame: at 6 month after index procedure
SAQ (angina severity)
at 6 month after index procedure
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: at 6 month - 1 year follow-up after index procedure
Left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography
at 6 month - 1 year follow-up after index procedure
NT-proBNP
Time Frame: at 6 month - 1 year follow-up after index procedure
NT-proBNP, pg/mL
at 6 month - 1 year follow-up after index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Young Bin Song, MD, PhD, Samsung Medical Center
  • Study Chair: Young Bin Song, MD, PhD, Samsung Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD, Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After publication of first manuscript and trial results, the de-identified data will be shared by permission of principle investigator, when asked

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of first manuscript and trial results, the de-identified data will be shared by permission of principle investigator, when asked

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After publication of first manuscript and trial results, the de-identified data will be shared by permission of principle investigator, when asked

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous coronary intervention

Subscribe