- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05853887
Liquid Biopsy Based NGS in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC (iNUDGE)
iNUDGE: INtegration of liqUiD Biopsy Based Next Generation Gene sEquencing in Newly Diagnosed NSCLC - A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
At the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS), a behavioral economics (BE) informed "nudge" strategy was piloted to guide physicians' clinical practice to include concurrent use of plasma and tissue-based next generation sequencing (NGS) testing at the time of initial diagnosis for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These findings have demonstrated that behavioral, electronic health record (EHR)-based nudges are feasible and can promote guideline concordant diagnostic testing at both community and academic sites. The overarching goal of this current trial is to expand the application of this BE informed nudge approach, which has been operationalized within Epic, the EHR used at UPHS, to six satellite hospitals.
Our central hypothesis is that this approach will dramatically increase adoption of comprehensive molecular testing and enhance the delivery of molecularly informed 1L therapy in patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC.
Molecular testing will be defined as i) comprehensive: EGFR, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET, and NTRK testing, ii) incomplete: <6 genes tested, and iii) no testing performed. Clinically actionable mutations will be defined as an alteration in one of the seven genes on the comprehensive gene list with an FDA approved targeted therapy in the 1L setting, plus KRAS G12C, EGFR exon 20 insertion, and ErbB2 mutations. Molecularly informed first line therapy will be defined as one that is informed by results of NGS, obtained by plasma, tissue or both.
Intervention
An EHR-based nudge intervention that allows for default placement of a plasma based molecular genotyping order at time of the first new patient visit will be implemented. Subsequently, results detected on the default plasma NGS order will be conveyed to providers in the form of an electronic clinical decision support notification.
As part of the downstream EHR-based nudge intervention workflow, an electronic clinical decision support (e-CDS) system for alterations detected on plasma genotyping will be created and implemented into the EHR as a "Research (non-chargeable) Encounter" to alert the provider team caring for the patient. This support program will be created to notify clinicians of targetable mutations, as well as absence of mutations detected on plasma testing as a means of improving the timely delivery of molecularly informed therapy.
Study Design
Objective 1: In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC, test the effectiveness of a behavioral economics (BE) informed EHR nudge intervention to increase timely receipt of comprehensive molecular test results before 1L therapy by integration of concurrent tissue and plasma molecular testing.
The design of this trial will include 3 clusters, representing 6 community hospitals. There will be an initial period in which no clusters are exposed to the intervention. Subsequently, at regular intervals (the "steps") one cluster (or a group of clusters) will be randomized to cross from the control to the intervention under evaluation. This process will continue until all clusters have crossed over to be exposed to the intervention. At the end of the study there will be a period when all clusters are exposed. Data collection will continue throughout the study, so that each cluster will contribute observations under both control and intervention observation periods. Two years of baseline data will be obtained from all study sites for comparison.
Objective 2: Evaluate contextual mechanisms contributing to the adoption, reach, and effectiveness of EHR nudge interventions with a lens for health equity.
Using rigorous approaches proven successful in our prior work, the investigators will recruit 10-15 patient and clinician participants from each site (estimated 40-60 participants total) to complete semi-structured interviews following the active trial period. The goal of this objective is to understand contextual mechanisms (e.g., patient, clinician, clinic, structural factors) shaping adoption, reach, and effectiveness of each intervention and identify how response may differ by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and other key social determinants of health. These data will be analyzed using qualitative comparative analysis, a mixed method approach well suited to identify mechanisms in pragmatic trials with smaller sample sizes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Meagan Hume, MPH
- Phone Number: 267-734-5455
- Email: Meagan.Hume@PennMedicine.upenn.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States, 08003
- Recruiting
- Penn Medicine Cherry Hill
-
Contact:
- Shayma Kazmi, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Shayma Kazmi, MD
-
Plainsboro, New Jersey, United States, 08536
- Recruiting
- Penn Medicine Princeton Health
-
Contact:
- Ramy Sedhom, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ramy Sedhom, MD
-
Sewell, New Jersey, United States, 08080
- Recruiting
- Penn Medicine Washington Township
-
Contact:
- Shayma Kazmi, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Shayma Kazmi, MD
-
Voorhees, New Jersey, United States, 08043
- Recruiting
- Penn Medicine Voorhees
-
Contact:
- Shayma Kazmi, MD
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17602
- Recruiting
- Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health
-
Contact:
- Samuel J Kerr, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Samuel J Kerr, MD
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Recruiting
- Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Christopher A D'Avella, MD
-
Contact:
- Christine Ciunci, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Christopher A D'Avella, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants with a histological, or cytological diagnosis of metastatic non-squamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not yet received systemic treatment for metastatic disease.
- Participants must be seen at Lancaster General Health (LGH), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (PPMC), Penn Medicine Cherry Hill (PMCH), Penn Medicine Princeton Health (PMPH), Penn Medicine Voorhees (PMV) or Penn Medicine Washington Township (PMWT) for mNSq NSCLC.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with incomplete staging information.
- Children, pregnant women, fetuses, neonates, or prisoners are not included in this research study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Penn Medicine New Jersey
All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time.
Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.
|
Electronic health record nudge which prompts physicians to order plasma-based NGS testing for eligible patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.
|
Other: Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health
All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time.
Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.
|
Electronic health record nudge which prompts physicians to order plasma-based NGS testing for eligible patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.
|
Other: Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
All sites with be randomized to implement the nudge at different points in time.
Prospective data with be compared with each site's respective baseline numbers over a two-year period.
|
Electronic health record nudge which prompts physicians to order plasma-based NGS testing for eligible patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Availability of comprehensive molecular test results prior to first line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed mNSq NSCLC
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosis
|
Were comprehensive molecular test results available prior to initiation of 1L therapy?
(Yes/No)
|
Measured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosis
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Successful EHR based nudge delivery
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 weeks from randomization
|
Amongst eligible patients, calculate the proportion of patients for whom the EHR nudge fired successfully (Yes/No).
Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
|
Measured up to 6 weeks from randomization
|
Turnaround time of delivery of provider focused alerts
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 weeks from randomization
|
Reported as number of days, median.
Applicable for the patients enrolled in the time periods following randomization.
|
Measured up to 6 weeks from randomization
|
Completion of comprehensive molecular testing & modality used
Time Frame: Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
|
Relative and absolute change in completion of comprehensive testing by tissue and plasma, plasma alone, or tissue alone will be tabulated.
|
Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
|
Reasons for failure to complete comprehensive molecular testing:
Time Frame: Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
|
Summarize reasons for failure of completion of testing i. Tissue related (QNS) ii.
Patient related factors (unable to biopsy, patient declined biopsy etc.) iii. Assay related factors (plasma assay does not detect mutations) iv.
Other
|
Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
|
Time to molecularly informed treatment initiation
Time Frame: Measured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosis
|
i. Calculated as time to therapy from the date of diagnosis of Stage IV disease (date of biopsy) ii.
Calculated as time to therapy from the date of first new patient visit with medical oncology
|
Measured up to 6 weeks from initial diagnosis
|
Type of therapy received
Time Frame: Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
|
i. Targeted therapy ii.
Chemo-immunotherapy iii.
Immunotherapy iv.
Clinical trial or n v. None
|
Measured up to 3 months from initial diagnosis
|
Overall survival
Time Frame: Measured up to 1 year from the time of randomization to death from any cause
|
i. Time from initial diagnosis to date of death or last follow up.
ii. 1 year and 2-year overall survival rates will be calculated for the intervention group, and compared to baseline.
|
Measured up to 1 year from the time of randomization to death from any cause
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, Penn Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kane H, Lewis MA, Williams PA, Kahwati LC. Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation. Transl Behav Med. 2014 Jun;4(2):201-8. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6.
- Shelton RC, Chambers DA, Glasgow RE. An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time. Front Public Health. 2020 May 12;8:134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134. eCollection 2020.
- Leighl NB, Page RD, Raymond VM, Daniel DB, Divers SG, Reckamp KL, Villalona-Calero MA, Dix D, Odegaard JI, Lanman RB, Papadimitrakopoulou VA. Clinical Utility of Comprehensive Cell-free DNA Analysis to Identify Genomic Biomarkers in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 1;25(15):4691-4700. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0624. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
- Aggarwal C, Thompson JC, Black TA, Katz SI, Fan R, Yee SS, Chien AL, Evans TL, Bauml JM, Alley EW, Ciunci CA, Berman AT, Cohen RB, Lieberman DB, Majmundar KS, Savitch SL, Morrissette JJD, Hwang WT, Elenitoba-Johnson KSJ, Langer CJ, Carpenter EL. Clinical Implications of Plasma-Based Genotyping With the Delivery of Personalized Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):173-180. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4305.
- Aggarwal C, Rolfo CD, Oxnard GR, Gray JE, Sholl LM, Gandara DR. Strategies for the successful implementation of plasma-based NSCLC genotyping in clinical practice. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;18(1):56-62. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0423-x. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
- Rolfo C, Mack P, Scagliotti GV, Aggarwal C, Arcila ME, Barlesi F, Bivona T, Diehn M, Dive C, Dziadziuszko R, Leighl N, Malapelle U, Mok T, Peled N, Raez LE, Sequist L, Sholl L, Swanton C, Abbosh C, Tan D, Wakelee H, Wistuba I, Bunn R, Freeman-Daily J, Wynes M, Belani C, Mitsudomi T, Gandara D. Liquid Biopsy for Advanced NSCLC: A Consensus Statement From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Oct;16(10):1647-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
- Singal G, Miller PG, Agarwala V, Li G, Kaushik G, Backenroth D, Gossai A, Frampton GM, Torres AZ, Lehnert EM, Bourque D, O'Connell C, Bowser B, Caron T, Baydur E, Seidl-Rathkopf K, Ivanov I, Alpha-Cobb G, Guria A, He J, Frank S, Nunnally AC, Bailey M, Jaskiw A, Feuchtbaum D, Nussbaum N, Abernethy AP, Miller VA. Association of Patient Characteristics and Tumor Genomics With Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Clinicogenomic Database. JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1391-1399. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3241. Erratum In: JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):480.
- Robert NJ, Espirito JL, Chen L, Nwokeji E, Karhade M, Evangelist M, Spira A, Neubauer M, Bullock S, Walberg J, Cheng SK, Coleman RL. Biomarker testing and tissue journey among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line therapy in The US Oncology Network. Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
- Thompson JC, Yee SS, Troxel AB, Savitch SL, Fan R, Balli D, Lieberman DB, Morrissette JD, Evans TL, Bauml J, Aggarwal C, Kosteva JA, Alley E, Ciunci C, Cohen RB, Bagley S, Stonehouse-Lee S, Sherry VE, Gilbert E, Langer C, Vachani A, Carpenter EL. Detection of Therapeutically Targetable Driver and Resistance Mutations in Lung Cancer Patients by Next-Generation Sequencing of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 1;22(23):5772-5782. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1231. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
- Rendle KA, Abramson CM, Garrett SB, Halley MC, Dohan D. Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e030123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030123.
- Whitaker RG, Sperber N, Baumgartner M, Thiem A, Cragun D, Damschroder L, Miech EJ, Slade A, Birken S. Coincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2020 Dec 11;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01070-3. Erratum In: Implement Sci. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):11.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UPCC 27522
- 852795 (Other Identifier: University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic
-
WindMIL TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Lung Cancer Metastatic | Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
ElephasBeaufort CRORecruitingNSCLC | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Metastatic NSCLC - Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Western Regional Medical CenterTerminatedNon-squamous Cell Non-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Squamous Cell Non-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
Genentech, Inc.CompletedNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Metastatic Cancers, MelanomaUnited States
-
Incyte CorporationZai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingMetastatic Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung CancerChina, Czechia, Russian Federation, Serbia, Malaysia, Vietnam, United States, Poland, Ukraine, Romania, Turkey, Brazil, Bulgaria, Georgia, Hungary, Philippines, South Africa
-
Shandong Boan Biotechnology Co., LtdCompletedMetastatic Colorectal Cancer | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer RecurrentChina
-
TheRas, IncRecruitingNSCLC | Metastatic Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Advanced Lung Carcinoma | Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | KRAS G12CUnited States, Australia
-
Tesaro, Inc.Active, not recruitingNeoplasms | Solid Tumor | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Metastatic Cancer | Advanced Cancer | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation...Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUnknownNon Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited Kingdom